Liberal
Luminaries in Senate Are Swing Votes on Bombing Syria
Global Research, September 09, 2013
Many senators began this week still uncommitted on
whether they’ll vote for attacking Syria. Among the fence-sitters are enough
“progressives” to swing the Senate’s decision one way or the other.
That decision is coming soon — maybe as early as
Wednesday — and the Obama White House is now pulling out all the stops to
counter public opinion, which remains overwhelmingly against a war resolution.
The administration hopes to win big in the Senate and carry momentum into the
House, where the bomb-Syria agenda faces a steeper climb.
Some Democratic senators who’ve cultivated progressive
reputations nationwide — Barbara Boxer of California, Dick Durbin of Illinois
and Al Franken of Minnesota — haven’t hesitated to dive into Obama’s war tank.
Boxer, Durbin and Franken quickly signed on as carnage bottom-feeders, pledging
their adamant support for the U.S. government to attack yet another country.
Other Democrats, like Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Tom
Udall of New Mexico, have made clear their intention to vote “no” when the
war-on-Syria measure reaches the Senate floor.
But more than a dozen other senators widely viewed as
liberal or progressive have held back from committing themselves on how they’ll
vote. Here’s a partial list of those equivocators:
* Both Massachusetts senators, Elizabeth Warren and Ed
Markey
* Both Oregon
senators, Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley
* Both Colorado senators, Mark Udall and Michael Bennet
* Both Washington
senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell
* Ohio senator Sherrod
Brown
* Wisconsin senator Tammy Baldwin
* Rhode Island senator Sheldon Whitehouse
* Hawaii senator Mazie
Hirono
* Minnesota senator
Amy Klobuchar
Perhaps no “undecided”
stance from senators is more egregious than the one from Wisconsin’s Tammy
Baldwin, who won a hard-fought race that elevated her from the House of
Representatives last year on the strength of major progressive support.
Speaking at the annual Fighting Bob Fest in Madison last
weekend, Baldwin sparked an angry response to her doubletalk about Syria. A video of the encounter shows a wooden politician who badly
needs reminding of her progressive roots. In a suitably confrontational mode,
activists serenaded Wisconsin’s junior senator with a stirring rendition of “Which side are you on Tammy?”
The symbolism could
hardly have been more apt. Senator Baldwin was behind the podium at an event
named after “Fighting Bob” La Follette, the senator from Wisconsin who led
opposition to U.S. entry into World War One. In a Senate speech, La Follette denounced those who “inflame the mind of our people into
the frenzy of war.”
Which side are you on Tammy... and Elizabeth, Ed, Ron,
Jeff, Mark, Michael, Patty, Maria, Sherrod, Sheldon, Mazie, Amy?
Senators who portray
themselves as progressive are at crossroads as they decide how to vote on
attacking Syria. At this historic moment, with enormous consequences, will they
cave in to the presidential juggernaut?
Later this week,
senators will vote about launching a war on Syria. We’ve got to let them know —
right away — that we are watching very closely. And will not forgive or forget
any vote for war on the Senate floor.
Norman
Solomon
is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for
Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits
Keep Spinning Us to Death.” Information about the documentary based on the book
is at www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.
Copyright © 2013 Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment