In this mailing:
We Are Charlie: Free Speech v. Self-Censorship
by Douglas Murray
• January 8, 2015 at 5:00 am
Will we
keep on blaming the victims? Perhaps the media assume that it is easier to
force good people to keep quiet, or keep their own media offices from being
attacked, than to than to tackle the problem of Islamic extremism head-on. It
is easier to blame Geert Wilders, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Lars Hedegaard, Suzanne
Winters, Salman Rushdie or Charlie Hebdo -- and even put some of them
on trial -- than to attack the attackers, who might even attack back!
The press
and the media seem to prefer coerced self-censorship: It is your own fault if
you get hurt: none of this would be happening to you if you had only kept
your mouth shut. It is easier to denigrate the people warning us about a
danger than it is to address the danger they are warning us about.
Do you
think a country should change its policies because segments of one community
will run into newspaper offices and gun people down if you don't?
If those
in positions of influence do not deal with this problem now, we will not like
those who deal with it later.
Wednesday's massacre at the Paris offices of the magazine Charlie
Hebdo was not just a barbaric act of jihadist violence. It was also a
test for the West and for the freedom of speech in the West. It is a test
that we all have been failing.
Those of us who have proposed that all Western -- and in particular
European -- news outlets should multilaterally publish the Charlie Hebdo
cartoons have been greeted in return with a terrified and terrifyingly
self-conscious silence. The papers and broadcasters do not want to do it.
Last time they refused to republish the cartoons, from Denmark's Jyllands
Posten, they said it was because the cartoons were from a "right
wing" newspaper. This time they refuse to republish cartoons from a
"left-wing" newspaper. It does not matter what the politics are --
it is not about the politics, it is about the cartoons. The sooner the press
at least has the guts to admit this, the better.
War Risk Rises in Middle East
by Yaakov Lappin
• January 8, 2015 at 4:00 am
Iran's
weapons industries are at the service of Hezbollah, while Hezbollah tries to
acquire precision-guided rockets and missiles for future attacks on strategic
Israeli sites.
The
Middle East is increasingly becoming an area where it is harder for actors to
exercise control over their situations or to control events.
Despite Israel's deterrence, the risk of an inadvertent clash between
Israel and Hezbollah is rising
The new year holds many new dangers and few opportunities, as Israel's
two near enemies, Hezbollah in Lebanon on its northern front and Hamas in
Gaza on its west, continue their large-scale armament programs, and prepare
for a future day when they will fight another war with Israel.
Although neither Hezbollah nor Hamas has an interest in sparking a war
with Israel any time soon -- when they stand to suffer widespread, lasting,
and crippling damage from any such clash -- both are nevertheless preparing
in earnest.
|
||
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php
14 East 60 St., Suite 1001, New York, NY 10022
|
Thursday, January 8, 2015
We Are Charlie: Free Speech v. Self-Censorship
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment