Posted: 13 May 2015 10:38 AM PDT
The great paradox of
the War on Terror is that we are fighting an enemy that doesn’t exist. We are
told incessantly that there is no such thing as a Muslim terrorist.
There
may be a tiny minority of violent extremists, but they are only a tiny
minority of no importance whatsoever. And yet we’ve been at war with this
same infinitesimally tiny minority for decades.
This tiny minority has killed thousands of Americans. It has the support of
entire governments in tiny countries like Pakistan (182 million), Iran (77
million) and Syria (22 million). We are told that this tiny minority is no
way representative of the world’s billion Muslims, and yet it’s hard to find
a Muslim country that doesn’t support or harbor a terrorist group.
We were told that the problems was their governments, but the Arab Spring
showed us that democratic elections lead to governments that are even more
supportive of tiny minority of extremists who are somehow taking over entire
countries.
Everything we’ve been told is obviously a lie. And the best evidence comes
from the liars themselves.
The media is howling that a bunch of cartoonists in Texas were irresponsible
for sketching Islam’s dead warlord because they should have known that Muslim
terrorists would come to kill them for it. But if the media is right and
Islam is a religion of peace, then why should they have anticipated a
terrorist attack?
And if Islam isn’t a religion of peace, then the media has been irresponsibly
lying to us and the cartoonists have been risking their lives to warn us of
that lie.
The talking heads on the television insist that the cartoon contest was
irresponsible because there were bound to be “some crazies” who would “take
the bait”. But if Islam is no more violent than any other religion, shouldn’t
it be just as statistically likely that some Christian or Jewish crazies
would attack one of the art exhibits, plays or musicals ridiculing and
blaspheming against their religions?
Weren’t museums and galleries exhibiting “works of art” like Piss Christ or
Shekhina provoking and baiting those Jewish and Christian crazies? And since
there are more Christians than Muslims in America, isn’t it statistically far
more likely that there should have been far more Christian terror attacks
targeting blasphemous exhibits?
We can only conclude that there is a much higher proportion of “crazies”
among Muslims than among Christians. How much higher? 78 percent of Americans
identify as Christians. 0.6 percent claim to be Muslims. Only 0.3 percent
appear to be Sunnis, who are responsible for ISIS and Al Qaeda attacks.
There is indeed a tiny minority of extremists in America. It’s known as
Islam.
What keeps the lie alive is another paradox. Call it Schrödinger's Jihad. The
more famous Schrödinger's Cat is a paradox in which a cat in a sealed box
with poison that has a 50 percent chance of being released is in an
indeterminate state. It is neither dead nor alive until someone opens the
box.
In Schrödinger's Jihad, the Muslim terrorist is in an indeterminate state
until some Western observer opens the box, collapses his wave function and
radicalizes him. The two Muslim Jihadists were in an indeterminate state until
Pamela Geller and Bosch Fawstin and the other “provocateurs” suddenly turned
them into terrorists in a matter of days or weeks. It didn’t matter that
Elton Simpson, one of the Garland terrorists, had already been dragged into
court for trying to link up with Jihadists in Africa.
Every Muslim is and isn’t a terrorist. He is both a peaceful spiritual person
who is eager to embrace our way of life and a violent killer who can be set
off by the slightest offense. Like the cat in the box that is neither dead
nor alive, he is both violent and peaceful, moderate and extremist, a solid
citizen and a terrorist. He does not choose which of these to be or to
become; we decide what he will be.
The Jihadist paradox is that the Muslim terrorist is always defined by what
we do, not by what he does.
Islamic terrorism does not exist independently of the Western
observer. It is not a Jihad with deep historical and theological roots within
Islam, but a reaction to our interactions with Muslims.
Obama insists that talking about Islamic terrorism ‘summons’ them into being.
By admitting the existence of Islamic terrorists, we ‘radicalize’ Muslims.
Even the words ‘Islamic terrorism’ creates Islamic terrorists who otherwise
wouldn’t exist.
The real threat is not from the terrorists, it’s from the truth.
When we tell the truth, people die. The truth turns Muslims into terrorists
while the lies soothe them back into non-existence. Underneath all the
academic terminology is the dream logic of wishful thinking. If we believe
that Islam is a religion of peace, it will be a peaceful religion, and if we
accept the reality that it’s violent, then it will become violent. Islam does
not define itself. We define it however we want. Our entire counterterrorism
policy is based around the perverse ostrich belief that Islamic terrorism is
a problem that we create by recognizing its existence. If we ignore it, it
will go away.
The lies about Islam are sustained by a deep conviction among liberals that
the “Other” minorities are not real people with real beliefs and cultures,
but victims in a game of power played out in the West. Islamic terrorism,
like gay marriage or Global Warming, is just another step in the progressive
pilgrim’s progress. It’s a problem that we caused and need to atone for in
our cosmic karmic journey.
Westerners are privileged observers who have power while those minorities
they observe do not. The duel between the Western left and right is taking
place outside the box to determine what will be in the box once it’s forced
open, while the oppressed minorities are in a state of indeterminacy in the
box.
The Schrödinger's Jihad paradox has many other adjoining boxes. Some are
filled with dictators and criminals. If the progressive observer can open the
box and find the root cause, out comes a good person; if the right opens the
box, then out will march the terrorists, drug dealers and warlords.
The other side of the rhetoric about oppression and colonization, of punching
up and punching down is the conviction that those at the bottom do not have
free will or agency. If the mugger chooses to mug, rather than being driven
to it by poverty, if Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union gleefully chose
conquest instead of being forced to it by Western imperialism, and if the
Muslim terrorist is not a helpless victim, but an abuser, then the moral
imperative of the left’s worldview collapses in a heap.
If Muslims are real people who are at least as capable of imperialism,
racism, slavery and destroying the planet as any Westerner, and who have been
doing all of these things a lot longer, then leftists would have to accept
that they are tearing down the most progressive civilization on the planet on
behalf of ridiculously reactionary civilizations. Not only would they no
longer be the privileged observers in control of the future, but they would
have to see themselves as destroyers of what is left of the future.
The left refuses to blame Islam or Muslims because that would mean admitting
that they are people.
Schrödinger's Jihad is a child’s toy box for overgrown children who view
Muslims as social justice dolls and terrorist action figures instead of
people as flawed and complicated as they are. The left refuses to take
Islamic theology seriously because it is incapable of understanding different
points of view.
It approaches Islam as a race, rather than a religion, because it refuses to
delve into what its beliefs are. Instead it chooses to see Muslims as blank
slates to be filled with its ideology, as indeterminate patterns that can be
reshaped into whatever they want them to be. It does not want to know what it
says in the Koran, because that ruins its wonderful fantasy of Muslims as an
oppressed race, rather than a creed.
Lies
that are based on what we want to be true are the hardest to disprove. A lie
that is tied into identity cannot be touched without destroying the entire
identity of an individual or a movement.
The lies about Islam run into the heart of what the left is. To the left,
everything is indeterminate and everything can be reshaped. Existence flows
from power and power is pitted against progress. By destroying that which
exists, they can bring their dreams to life. The dream is stronger than
reality.
The left doesn’t really believe that Muslim terrorists exist except when we
bring them to life. The real animating force behind Al Qaeda was George W.
Bush or Dick Cheney. The true power behind ISIS is Pamela Geller or the
Pentagon. The Westerner opens the box and the Muslim terrorist comes out.
When Western civilization as we know it is destroyed, then the left believes
Muslim terrorism will end. Kill the observer and the cat never existed.
Destroy the dreamer and the nightmare dies with him.
The truth is more dangerous than the terrorists. Terrorists can kill the
body, but truth can kill the dream.
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment