chat
198
comments
(Shutterstock)
I
could be writing every week about Sweden. Every day. Every hour. For
reasons that will be analyzed by historians for a long, long time –
provided the Western world doesn't become so thoroughly Islamized that
the possibility of objective historical scrutiny is utterly obliterated –
the Swedes have chosen a path of cultural and societal suicide that
puts all other countries in the shade.
For
anyone curious about self-destructive psychopathologies, it is a grimly
fascinating phenomenon. Why, of all places, Sweden? How can a Swedish
woman raped by an illegal Muslim immigrant be so bursting with racial
guilt that she hesitates to report the crime to the police for fear that
her report might lead to her rapist's punishment or deportation? Or,
more generally, because news of the offense might result in an increase
in “Islamophobia?"
This is
the kind of madness that's going on in Sweden now. More than any other
country in Europe, it has a government and a media that are in denial
about the truth, a legal system that punishes those who dare to tell the
truth, and a people who have been brainwashed for decades with the vile
lie that they have a moral obligation to hand their country over to
hostile, despotic strangers from far away.
No,
Sweden isn't North Korea. The ugly news does get out, one way or
another. Some of it, anyway. It's just that, with extremely rare
exceptions, the important facts about the nation's disastrous
Islamization don't find their way into the country's own mainstream
media. On the contrary, Sweden's major TV, radio, and print outlets are
notorious for the fidelity with which they parrot the government line
and omit or whitewash uncomfortable news developments.
No,
if you're looking for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth about most of the nasty stuff going on in Sweden these days,
you're better off checking out Swedish websites such as Avpixlat and Fria Tider, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, and two Norwegian sites: document.no and rights.no, the latter being the site of the organization Human Rights Service.
I've previously quoted a March 11 Jyllands-Posten editorial
that spelled out the Swedish situation quite frankly: what should “most
worry Sweden's neighbors,” the Danish editors wrote, is the Swedes'
“unwillingness to openly and honestly discuss the government-approved
multicultural idyll.
... In the long run, the mendacity that
characterizes the Swedish debate cannot be maintained. The discrepancy
between the official, idealized version of Sweden, 'the people's home,'
and the brutal reality that everyone can see has simply become too
great.”
Indeed. This is a
country where rapes by Muslim men are systematically ignored by the
authorities or responded to with minimal punishment. Routinely, Swedish
courts refuse to return these monsters – some of whom have repeatedly
subjected small boys and girls to violent sexual abuse – to their home
countries for fear that they'll be put in danger. In other words,
Swedish judges care more about the safety of foreign rapists than that
of Swedish children.
(No wonder U.S. News and World Report has just named
Sweden the best country in the world to be an immigrant. Yet another
cockeyed ranking. The proper question isn't which country is best for
immigrants, but which country has the most sensible immigration policy.)
It's a country where even prominent Swedish feminists – fanatical boosters of multiculturalism – are now moving out of Muslim-heavy neighborhoods
not only because of the Muslim rapists but because of the Muslim
“morality police,” who are less concerned with monitoring rapists than
with controlling women's conduct. (One such feminist organized “coffee
shop meetings” with Muslim male community leaders in an attempt to
resolve the situation, but gave up.)
It's
a country where the government rolls out the red carpet for returning
ISIS members, giving them special benefits, in hopes that they'll see
the light and put down their weapons.
It's
a country where, while Muslim rapists and terrorists are forgiven,
critics of immigrant conduct are punished. In May, a 70-year-old woman
in Dalarna, Sweden, was arrested
for writing on Facebook in 2015 about immigrants who “set cars on fire
and urinate and defecate in the streets.” (She faces up to four years in
prison.)
No surprise, then, that on July 7, Jyllands-Posten reported
that the Swedish government plans to alter the nation's Constitution in
such a way as to give itself the power to limit online free speech
about precisely these ticklish matters. Among other things, wrote Jyllands-Posten,
it will become illegal “for certain websites to publicize information
about private persons' ethnicity or conviction of crimes.”
Of
course: the best way to address the ever-rising tide of Muslim
criminality is to close down every last media outlet that reports
honestly about it. The mainstream Swedish media are already playing
ball; it's just a few recalcitrant websites that need to be scrubbed
clean. Presumably the next step will be to block access in Sweden to Jyllands-Posten and other foreign news sources that tell Swedes the truth about what's going on within their own borders.
Then
everything will be just perfect, no? And what are the chances that no
matter how much Sweden tightens its already alarming (if currently
tacit) limits on freedom of speech, Reporters without Borders will keep
Sweden at its ridiculous #2 spot on the World Press Freedom Index?
Posts
