Monday, April 1, 2013

The Latest from National Terror Alert Response Center

The Latest from National Terror Alert Response Center

Link to Homeland Security News


Posted: 31 Mar 2013 07:54 AM PDT
New York Police are hunting at least three suspects who are thought to have snatched a couple off a street at gunpoint and hustled them into a black minivan. Read More This story comes to us via Homeland Security - National Terror Alert. National Terror Alert is America's trusted source for homeland security news and [...]
This story comes to us via Homeland Security - National Terror Alert. National Terror Alert is America's trusted source for homeland security news and information.

Police hunt for kidnappers as couple are snatched at gunpoint off Manhattan street in broad daylight

Gatestone Update :: Douglas Murray: "Nuke Up Fast"


Facebook  Twitter  RSS
Gatestone Institute

"Nuke Up Fast"

by Douglas Murray
April 1, 2013 at 5:00 am
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Disarmed despots are soon-to-be-dead despots.
If you like what is happening with North Korea at the moment, you will love what happens when Iran goes nuclear.
In case anyone is in any doubt, it is always worth remembering that North Korea is a basket-case of a country – probably in the most abysmal situation of any country on earth (not forgetting the Middle East). Its people intermittently starve by the millions, and all of them lack even the most basic of amenities. As Shin Dong-hyuk and a few other unbelievably fortunate escapees have attested, concentration camps (for once the term is not inaccurate) are maintained across the country. And even those fortunate enough not to be in them are cut off from the outside world by a regime which has the unique selling point of being the world's only Stalinist monarchy. The authorities have no ability to provide the most basic services to the majority of its population; and after years of sanctions, can do almost nothing either internally or externally to alter the situation it finds itself in. Yet here it is, dictating the news agendas of the world.
And why? For two straightforward reasons. First, because it has a new leader of whom everyone is ignorant. No one – no other government, intelligence agency or foreign office – is entirely sure of his intentions. We do know that he spent some time at a school in Switzerland and has a fondness for basketball. But apart from that and a few other tiny details, there is almost nothing known about him. It was the same with his father and indeed his grandfather. We knew what type of sushi the current Kim's father liked, and we knew he was a fan of Hollywood movies, but aside from such ephemera we had almost no idea of the type of man he was or the type of things he thought. Now his son – the third generation of the family to reign – is even more of a mystery. So there, undoubtedly, is the first problem.
But the second reason is even far more straightforward: North Korea is now in the Nuclear Club. No one is quite sure how rudimentary are the devices that they have set off (including the third such test just this February). But nevertheless they have managed it. Assisted by any number of rogue states, networks and cartels, the most isolated regime on earth has finally got into the only club that matters. And why? Why would a regime allow its people to suffer the most biting sanctions, the most appalling privations and itself to suffer the most complete international isolation – just for the possession of this one type of weaponry?
It is because the regime in Pyongyang knows something that everybody now knows but which those countries already in the Nuclear Club are increasingly unwilling to admit: the very clear lesson of the fate of Libya's Colonel Gaddafi.
Gaddafi, you will remember, committed what is a clear, cardinal, school-boy error for dictators. In 2003, concerned by the US/UK and allied invasion of Iraq and toppling of Saddam Hussein for his WMD program, Gaddafi suddenly volunteered up – to the US and UK premiers it should be remembered, not the UN – his somewhat more-advanced-than-anybody-had-realized WMD program. Having seen Saddam Hussein fall for less, Gaddafi decided it was more trouble than it was worth in those days to continue going down that route.
But what a difference a decade makes. For apart from anything else, Gaddafi himself is now history. Having given up his WMD program, he then made the terrible error, once a rebellion against his rule began, of beginning to massacre his own people . And so – for humanitarian reasons – NATO intervened and toppled Gaddafi. And the last anyone saw of Gaddafi, he was being assaulted by a mob, beaten, having a knife put in every conceivable part of his body and then shot.
If you were a Kim or a Mullah, what lesson would you take from that? Personally, putting my dictator hat on I would take one lesson: "nuke up fast." And certainly, on no account should you disarm. Disarmed despots are soon-to-be-dead despots. It is a lesson the North Koreans have taken on board with understandable eagerness and with – to date – considerable success. After all, for all the latest round of bellicose rhetoric against South Korea, there is no US or NATO or any other kind of talk of, for instance, regime-change in North Korea. The system there may be – against stiff competition – the worst human rights violator in the world. Yet nobody is talking about toppling Kim. They are elementary nuclear, after all.
And this is the lesson you will be imbibing also if you are a Supreme Leader, President or even just some common Mullah in Tehran. Come sanctions, international pressure or anything else, the precedents of Gaddafi and Kim Jong-Un will be fresh in your mind. And most fresh will be the thought that one of them is dead and the other alive.
Of course if Iran gets the nukes the results will not be exactly the same. No two dictatorships are ever exactly alike. But there will be striking similarities in the way it plays out. For instance, just as with North Korea, nobody will be able to guess what any particular new leader – in what will then be an eternal regime – actually thinks or what his personal or political ambitions truthfully are. We won't end up being able to read them much better than we currently read the Kims. But in any event, it won't matter. Because then we will know what the Mullahs know now – that nukes are the way to perpetual survival for them, and perpetual nightmare for everyone else.
Related Topics:  Iran, North Korea  |  Douglas Murray

To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php

A Christian Catastrophe

RELIGION OF PEACE???
BULLLSHITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!



A Christian Catastrophe

Islamist ‘cleansing’ in Mideast

  • Last Updated: 12:11 AM, April 1, 2013
  • Posted: 10:13 PM, March 31, 2013
headshot
Islamist terrorists and fanatics are methodically exterminating the 2,000-year-old Christian civilization of the Middle East through oppression, threats, appropriations and deadly violence.

Our media ignore the intensifying savagery against Christians in Muslim Brotherhood-controlled Egypt. Unconfirmed reports assert that, last month, Muslim Brothers dragged Christian protesters to a mosque and tortured them — but our reporters won’t look into an Islamist Abu Ghraib.

For a century and a half, the varied strands of Middle East Christianity have faced increasingly fierce pogroms and, for the Armenians, outright genocide. But with the rise of Wahhabi and Salafist terror, the long, slow-motion Holocaust accelerated.

Another attack on Egypt’s 10 million Coptic Christians: Firemen dousing a blaze at a New Year’s car bombing outside a Coptic church.
AP
Another attack on Egypt’s 10 million Coptic Christians: Firemen dousing a blaze at a New Year’s car bombing outside a Coptic church.

Western liberals romanticize barbaric cultures but have no interest in the destruction — before their averted eyes — of a great and brilliant religious civilization. It’s as if they accept the Islamist creed that Christians don’t belong in the realms of Islam.

But the Middle East was more than just Christianity’s birthplace. The faith we know matured in the Middle East and North Africa, from Ephesus and Antioch to Alexandria and beyond. St. Augustine, the most influential church father after St. Paul, was a North African.

Rome was a latecomer to Christian authority. Through the Middle Ages, substantially more Christians lived east of Constantinople (now Istanbul) than in Europe, the faith’s backwater, whose northern reaches had yet to be evangelized.

Christianity’s greatest thinkers, greatest monuments and greatest triumphs for its first 1,000 years rose in the Middle East. Even the Muslim conquest and relative servitude could not dislodge Christianity. In the worst of times, Christianity turned the other cheek and endured. Some Christians flourished.

Today, the end is in sight.

In Iraq, cities such as Mosul and Saddam’s hometown, Tikrit, were once vital centers of Christianity. But the country’s Christian population, estimated at up to 2 million a decade ago, has fallen by half — perhaps by three-quarters.

Over 2 million Christians in Syria dread Islamist terror and religious cleansing so much, they lean toward the vicious Assad regime, which at least shielded minorities. Those who can, flee the country.

Christians were early supporters of Arab nationalism. One of the fiercest Palestinian leaders, George Habash, was a Christian, as was the wife of Yasser Arafat. Their thanks? Two-thirds of the West Bank’s and more of Gaza’s Christians have been driven out. They’re now a small minority even in Bethlehem (a situation ignored by our visiting president).

Egypt has the region’s largest remaining Christian population, at least 10 million Copts. With rare exceptions, they’ve long been confined to squalid quarters and treated as third-class citizens. Now the Salafist fanatics have been unleashed. The nation’s Muslim Brotherhood rulers could put a stop to anti-Christian violence, but appear willing to let the Salafists do the dirty work for them. They’re playing bad cop, not-so-bad cop.
And we’ll send the regime at least a billion dollars this year — with no stipulations or conditions except that military-related funds must purchase US-made or US-licensed equipment. With Egypt’s economy in desperate straits and the Brotherhood’s popularity fading, we’re propping up religious-cleansing bigots.
Christians in Iran? Gone. Turkey? Almost gone. Saudi Arabia? The once-thriving Christian and Jewish populations of Mecca and Medina were finished off centuries ago.

And in Lebanon, the only Middle East country that until recently had a Christian majority, Christian rights have been so threatened by Sunni fanaticism that some Christians have reached out to Shia Hezbollah in their desperate hunt for allies.

Far to the east, in Pakistan, Christians face trumped-up charges of insulting Islam or rape, beatings, murder and church bombings. And we still pour billions into Pakistan.

It’s the end of a world as we know it.

If Islam is a “religion of peace,” it’s time to show the evidence to the endangered Christians of the Middle East.
Of course, not all Christians are angels, nor are all Muslims demons. Most humans of any faith just want to get through the day. And some Christians have collaborated with odious Baathist regimes (usually, to ensure their community’s survival). Nor are most Muslims active supporters of the religious cleansing of Christians from their shared homelands.

But disappointingly few Muslims actively defend religious minorities. It’s not unlike Nazi Germany, where most Germans didn’t want to murder Jews, but were complicit through their silence.

If a Michigan mosque is defaced with graffiti, it makes national news and the Justice Department views it as a hate crime. It’s time for our government and media to apply the same standard abroad on behalf of Christians. 

READ THE REST


Nusra Front Brainwashing Syrian Children



Religion of peace???

BULLSHIT
BULLLSHITTTT
BULLLLLSHITTTTTT!!!

SAVAGES!!!!!


The Implications of Obama's Foreign Policy Team for the Middle East :: A briefing by Jonathan S. Tobin


Middle East ForumMiddle East Forum
Promoting American Interests
Facebook  Twitter  RSS  Join Mailing List
Follow the Middle East Forum
MEF Home   |    Research & Writings   |   Middle East Quarterly   |   MEF @ Facebook   |   MEF @ Twitter   |   Donate
Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area.

The Implications of Obama's Foreign Policy Team for the Middle East

A briefing by Jonathan S. Tobin
March 20, 2013
Be the first of your friends to like this.

Multimedia for this item

Audio Recording
Jonathan S. Tobin, senior online editor of Commentary magazine and writer for the magazine's "Contentions" blog on its website, briefed the Middle East Forum via conference call on March 20, 2013. The briefing took place during Obama's first presidential visit to Israel.
Mr. Tobin began his talk by comparing the foreign policy teams of the two Obama administrations. He argued that while all three members of the first-term team (Secretary of State Clinton, Secretaries of Defense Panetta and Gates) were no advocates of a strong forward foreign policy, they were keenly aware of Washington's security requirements and the need to stand by its allies. By contrast, the composition of the second-term team raises the specter of a dark period in U.S.-Israeli relations, an undeterred Iranian nuclear threat, and a weakened U.S. national security. Specifically,
  • · Secretary of State John Kerry, a believer in multilateralism and the U.N., has described Syria's President Assad as a moderate and is afflicted by the dangerous hubris of solving the crises in the Middle East.
  • · Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel belongs to the old Realist school of thought that upholds the unrealistic belief in an outreach to Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah while questioning the value of the U.S.-Israel alliance.
  • · Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan sought to appease Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood in his former capacity as chief counterterrorism advisor to the White House, displaying a distinct lack of resolve in pursuing the war on terror.
In the final account, however, it is Obama who sets policy in this top down administration rather than his team; and having wasted his first term on dead-end diplomacy with Tehran and the Palestinians, the president's Israel visit suggested that he has learnt from his mistakes. This was demonstrated, inter alia, by his reaffirmation of Washington's "eternal" alliance with Jerusalem in language validating Israel's ancient history: in stark contrast to his 2009 Cairo speech which ascribed Israel's right to exist to the Holocaust. Obama also upped his rhetoric regarding Iran, leaving himself little room short of a full diplomatic success that would contain Tehran's nuclear threat.
These positive aspects notwithstanding, given Obama's past failure to follow through on his rhetoric it remains to be seen whether his recent pronouncements translate into actions that make the U.S. more secure while maintaining its close alliance with Israel.
Summary account by Marilyn Stern, Associate Fellow with the Middle East Forum
Related Topics:  US policy This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to http://www.meforum.org/list_subscribe.php

IW News Brief: Syrian Rebel PM Is Ex-CAIR Official, and More


Islamist Watch
Home   |   Articles   |   Blog   |   About   |   Donate
Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area.

IW News Brief: Syrian Rebel PM Is Ex-CAIR Official, and More

by David J. Rusin  •  Mar 31, 2013 at 12:22 pm
Share: FacebookTwitterGoogle +1
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Islamist Watch (IW) maintains an extensive archive of news items on nonviolent Islamism in the Western world. The complete collection can be found here; lists organized by topic are accessible on the right side of the IW homepage.
The following are some of the recent developments covered in the IW database:
New Syrian opposition leader linked to U.S. Islamist groups
The National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, the umbrella body seeking to replace the Assad regime, has elected U.S. citizen Ghassan Hitto as interim prime minister. Hitto served on the board of the Dallas-Fort Worth chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), but this is just one of his many ties to Muslim Brotherhood entities. The Indianapolis Star notes that Hitto worked for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), which, like CAIR, were unindicted co-conspirators in the trial of the Hamas-financing Holy Land Foundation (HLF). Hitto also has been connected to the Muslim American Society (MAS), described by prosecutors as "the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America," and the defunct Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP). Given this record, it would strain credulity to suggest that Hitto is not an Islamist.
A 2012 IW article looks at other leading American Islamists who now play key roles in the Syrian opposition, including Louay Safi, Yaser Tabbara, and Najib Ghadbian. Though their involvement does not bode well for Syria's future, consider the bright side: the more they focus on promoting Islamism over there, the less time they can devote to it over here.
Left: Ghassan Hitto also was a founder of the Muslim Legal Fund of America, which has supported the HLF defendants and other jihadist luminaries. Right: In a demonstration of cultural fortitude, English families object to a fully halal menu at Larkswood Primary School.
Parents push back against London school's plan to go halal
Resistance to the proliferation of halal food has bubbled up in the London district of Chingford, where parents are outraged over Larkswood Primary's intention to adopt a halal-only menu, even though just one in ten students is Muslim. "Why should their views be forced on us? I think it's disgusting," a mother said. "I do not want my child eating food which has been slaughtered in this way and blessed." She claimed that parents had been led to believe that halal items would be offered merely as an option. Headteacher Lynne Harrowell has thus far dismissed the criticism: "It is in line with the majority of other schools in London. … Most of New Zealand lamb is halal, as is the meat in many restaurants and fast food places like KFC. Many people are very aware that most of us eat halal meat." In other words, halal is everywhere, so get used to it.
Larkswood parents are not the first in England to take a stand. Last October, Lynnfield Primary School in Hartlepool revealed that it would begin serving halal meat to all students, but the decision was quickly reversed following "complaints from fuming parents." More such displays of backbone will be necessary to slow halal's long march through the institutions.
Muslim Democrats seek political clout in New York City
Efforts to align the Democratic Party with Muslim interests took yet another step with the March 14 launch of the Muslim Democratic Club of New York, "dedicated to helping elect responsible Democrats to local office." Based on an estimated 105,000 Muslim voters in the city, the group believes that it can sway a number of races. The party is taking notice as well; the club's kickoff was attended by two mayoral candidates, representatives of others, and CAIR's Zead Ramadan, a City Council hopeful. One of its prime movers is Linda Sarsour, an Islamist who wants the organization to combat "NYPD surveillance of the Muslim community." Sarsour joined a press conference on March 11 to publicize Mapping Muslims, a new report blasting police counterterrorism work and urging mosques to "announce … that informants are not tolerated."
The relationship between Muslims and the Democratic Party has grown closer in recent years, as epitomized by a May 2012 fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Headlined by Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and featuring high-profile Islamists such as CAIR executive director Nihad Awad, the event rolled out the National Muslim Democratic Council, which aims to "maximize American Muslim support for Democratic candidates and policies." According to CAIR, over 85 percent of Muslims voted for President Obama in 2012.
Left: Known for pushing conspiracy theories, spouting anti-Israel rhetoric, and being "too busy to get her facts straight," Linda Sarsour was honored by the White House as a "champion of change" in 2011. Right: Muslim taxi drivers snarl traffic around Manhattan's Madina Masjid.
Triple parking for Islam: A tale of cabbies and conflict
Think parking is bad in your neighborhood? DNAInfo.com shares a slice of life from Manhattan's East Village, where the Madina Masjid is "drawing a steady stream of cabs that clog streets and flout parking rules so their drivers can attend prayer services," thus "disrupting area business." Infractions include "filling metered spaces and parking in front of fire hydrants, in truck loading zones, and in bus lanes" while police reportedly do little. "They can be triple-parked," explained a nearby baker who "has learned to plan his deliveries of baking supplies around the mosque's five daily services." One heated argument allegedly turned violent.
An article about a strikingly similar situation involving the Islamic Cultural Center on the Upper West Side appeared in 2011. British anti-mosque activist Gavin Boby would refer to these cases as manifestations of a supremacist "parking jihad," but regardless of any ulterior motives, Manhattan's taxi troubles carry an important lesson: parking concerns expressed in opposition to mosque projects are often legitimate — and not simply a cover for "Islamophobia."
* * *
For additional news and analysis, please visit the IW website.
Related Topics:  Demonstrations, Government, Halal, Legal, Lobby Groups, Mosques / Imams, Multiculturalism, Police / FBI, Prayers, Schools (Non-Islamic)  |  David J. Rusin This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.islamist-watch.org/list_subscribe.php