|
|
Follow the Middle
East Forum
|
||||
|
Please take a moment to
visit and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your
area.
Obama vs. Putin -- is the Cold War about to return to the Middle East?Should he make that trip, Putin would likely get a warm, if not rapturous reception, both in government and on the street. But if President Barack Obama should go there -- or anywhere in the Arab world-- now, the warmth would likely be of another kind entirely. Obama's October 9 decision to freeze about a third of this year's $1.6 billion aid package to Egypt, and his coldly critical reaction to the popularly-demanded ouster of President Mohammed Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood (MB) organization from power on July 3, have predictably angered most Egyptians. After all, the Obama administration had not only helped Morsi and the MB gain power, but rewarded them with increased assistance even as they created a terror-supporting Islamist dictatorship during its year-long rule. And now, the revelation in an October 27 analysis by Mark Landler in The New York Times that the Obama administration no longer views Egypt -- "once a central pillar of U.S. foreign policy" -- as very important can only inflame that opinion further. National Security Adviser Susan Rice told Landler that the president is now fixed mainly on concluding an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, solving the crisis in Syria and trying to get results from almost invisible ongoing Israeli-Palestinian talks (about holding real talks) quixotically pushed by Secretary of State John Kerry. This "more modest approach," as Landler called it, which resulted from a White House-only foreign policy review led by Rice last July and August -- puts at grave risk the survival of the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, our vital priority access to the Suez Canal and crucial anti-terrorism cooperation as well. Egypt's sudden demotion, after the nation served as the poster-child for the administration's disastrous policy of promoting "democracy" by helping Islamists rise through elections in the Arab Spring, probably reflects Obama's frustration that he cannot get his way with the country's immensely popular new leader, General Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi. In contrast, Putin has been the most-outspoken world leader to defend Morsi's removal. Indeed, many in Egypt--including al-Sisi--have already spoken of trading the three decades-plus alliance with America for one with Russia, while Egyptian-Russian military ties are said to have increased dramatically. In an August 3 phone conversation with U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, al-Sisi is quoted as scolding him, "You left the Egyptians. You turned your back on the Egyptians, and they won't forget that." On October 17, Egypt's Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy told CNN's Christiane Amanpour that his country "will find other sources" for military aid if necessary, presumably meaning Russia and possibly China as well. Putin's clever seizure of the initiative to prevent an armed (if "unbelievably small," in Kerry's words) U.S. strike on Syria in September over the use of chemical weapons near Damascus on August 21, plus his tough anti-Islamist talk, have turned many heads in the region. The administration's new Middle East doctrine conveniently justifies Obama's eager acceptance of Putin's proposal to send in U.N. teams to deal with Syria's chemical weapons after he fecklessly flip-flopped over his famous "red line" on their use--which he subsequently denied having drawn in the first place. Meanwhile, Obama's so far limited, but disturbing efforts to aid Morsi's friends in the Islamist-dominated rebellion against Assad have made him look both wrong-headed and faint-hearted at the same time, in a region where Islamism (happily) may be losing its appeal, and where feebleness is fatally unattractive. Also in September came the charm offensive of Iran's new president, Hassan Rouhani, which many fear will lead to the U.S. accepting an incomplete plan to cut off Iran's hydra-headed efforts to develop nuclear weapons in its haste just to cut a deal. In mid-October, the U.S. and five other world powers spoke with the Iranians on the issue for two days in Geneva, to resume November 7--while the latest reports indicate that Iran may be only one month away from having the bomb. This all echoes the forgotten rivalry of the Cold War, when the former Soviet Union was the main supplier of armaments, training and advisers to the anti-Western bloc of Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and the then-openly terrorist PLO. After Egypt switched sides following the 1973 war with Israel, the U.S. was able to impose a sort of Pax Americana, at least as far as that conflict was concerned. But now, as Egypt possibly breaks toward Moscow, while Iran -- like Syria, a Russian ally -- hoodwinks Washington into letting it develop nuclear weapons in the guise of a bogus "grand bargain" -- the old order may give way to a new, unstable Pax Russiana instead. And that would be far more than a "modest" debacle—for the U.S., the region and the world. Raymond Stock, a Shillman-Ginsburg Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum and a former Assistant Professor of Arabic and Middle East Studies at Drew University, spent twenty years in Egypt, and was deported by the Mubarak regime in 2010. |
|||||
|
To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to http://www.meforum.org/list_subscribe.php |
|||||
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Obama vs. Putin -- is the Cold War about to return to the Middle East? :: Stock in Fox News
Radioactive Fallout from Fukushima
Digital Globe
Radioactive Fallout from Fukushima
http://www.independent.com/news/2013/oct/31/radioactive-fallout-fukushima/
The World as We Know It Has Changed
Thursday, October 31, 2013
By Stephen Hosea
I believe that humanity is standing on the brink of a possible
worldwide nuclear holocaust. The world as we know it has already changed
as the result of radioactive material that has been released into the
air and the ocean.
I am not an alarmist, but I am alarmed.
I know that large quantities of radioactive material are in a precariously unstable situation in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility. An inability to effectively keep this material cool could easily result in another nuclear event. Another natural disaster like the recent typhoon or earthquake that occurred October 25, 2013, will further minimize the likelihood of a meaningful response.
I know radioactivity has been and continues to be released into the air and ocean. The effects on our health are incomprehensible because the magnitude of radioactivity released and the extent of spread and contamination are virtually unknown.
I know that I don’t know all of the details, risks, and levels of radioactivity. I do know I have been exposed. I consumed Pacific Bluefin tuna (PBFT) caught off the coast of San Diego four weeks ago. A Stanford study has shown that all PBFT caught off the West Coast of California had 10 times the usual amount of radioactive cesium present prior to the Fukushima event in March 2011.
I believe that our health is the great equalizer. In my clinical career, I have had the good fortune to care for the homeless and the disenfranchised and the rich and the famous. When one is lying in a hospital bed with those special gowns that are wide open in the back, everyone is pretty much the same. The air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat are gifts of life for all of us no matter what our creed or our color.
I know that these precious gifts have been contaminated. The silence from the media and the powers that be has been deafening.
The Chinese symbol for crisis is composed of two letters — one is danger and the other is opportunity. We have an opportunity to help the Japanese with the crisis in Fukushima. I want the best and the brightest that money can’t buy to be making those decisions. This is not a request — this is an inalienable right for the sake of our children and our children’s children and all of humanity.
We have an opportunity to protect ourselves from future nuclear events at home and around the world. They only are called accidents if we do not take measures to prevent them. The time to act is now.
“The Perils of Fukushima: What You Don’t Know Really Could Kill You” lecture takes place Friday, November 1, 12:15 p.m., Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Burtness Auditorium.
I am not an alarmist, but I am alarmed.
I know that large quantities of radioactive material are in a precariously unstable situation in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility. An inability to effectively keep this material cool could easily result in another nuclear event. Another natural disaster like the recent typhoon or earthquake that occurred October 25, 2013, will further minimize the likelihood of a meaningful response.
I know radioactivity has been and continues to be released into the air and ocean. The effects on our health are incomprehensible because the magnitude of radioactivity released and the extent of spread and contamination are virtually unknown.
I know that I don’t know all of the details, risks, and levels of radioactivity. I do know I have been exposed. I consumed Pacific Bluefin tuna (PBFT) caught off the coast of San Diego four weeks ago. A Stanford study has shown that all PBFT caught off the West Coast of California had 10 times the usual amount of radioactive cesium present prior to the Fukushima event in March 2011.
I believe that our health is the great equalizer. In my clinical career, I have had the good fortune to care for the homeless and the disenfranchised and the rich and the famous. When one is lying in a hospital bed with those special gowns that are wide open in the back, everyone is pretty much the same. The air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat are gifts of life for all of us no matter what our creed or our color.
I know that these precious gifts have been contaminated. The silence from the media and the powers that be has been deafening.
The Chinese symbol for crisis is composed of two letters — one is danger and the other is opportunity. We have an opportunity to help the Japanese with the crisis in Fukushima. I want the best and the brightest that money can’t buy to be making those decisions. This is not a request — this is an inalienable right for the sake of our children and our children’s children and all of humanity.
We have an opportunity to protect ourselves from future nuclear events at home and around the world. They only are called accidents if we do not take measures to prevent them. The time to act is now.
“The Perils of Fukushima: What You Don’t Know Really Could Kill You” lecture takes place Friday, November 1, 12:15 p.m., Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Burtness Auditorium.
Eye on Iran: White House Faces Tough Sell in Congress on Delay of Iran Sanctions
|
Latest Headlines from ENENews
Latest Headlines from ENENews |
- TV: “Japan’s worst nuclear nightmare” — Yale Professor: Removing fuel from Fukushima Unit 4 pool “has me very scared” — Tepco: “We believe it’s not dangerous” (VIDEO)
- “We’ve opened a door to hell” at Fukushima plant, and may never be able to close it — Radio Host: You mean that even with robots they don’t know where the 3 reactor cores are? (AUDIO)
- Japan Professor: Pregnant women get free new houses if they move back to Fukushima — Physician/Mayor: Children being severely harmed, must be evacuated; World has never come across situation like this (VIDEO)
- Why are they ‘speeding up’ at Unit 4? — Expert in 2010: Megathrust quake to hit Fukushima ~Nov. 2013… Recurrence interval of 75 years with last rupture Nov. 1938 — Planet’s most powerful type of seismic event — WSJ: Top official concerned quake to destabilize fuel pool
- Warning from Japan’s Top Nuclear Official: I am “much more worried” about fuel in Fukushima Unit 4 — Rods may break open and release highly radioactive material — Beware risks from debris, a disaster if damaged — Removal may start Nov. 8
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
