Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Why Was Stone Arrested Instead of Being Asked to Surrender?


Why Was Stone Arrested Instead of Being Asked to Surrender?

by Alan M. Dershowitz  •  January 29, 2019 at 3:00 pm
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • If there was no legitimate reason for the arrest and handcuffing of this presumed innocent defendant, what was the illegitimate reason? The illegitimate purpose of the arrest was to intimidate the potential witness -- namely Stone -- into not invoking his constitutional right to remain silent, rather than to testify as a government witness.
  • As Judge T.S. Ellis, III, who presided over the Manafort trial observed: "You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud – what you really care about is what information Mr. Manafort could give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump or lead to his prosecution or impeachment."
  • The ACLU has been absolutely silent in regard to the questionable tactics employed by Mueller. They, too, would have been up in arms had these tactics been employed against their favorite candidate and mine, Hillary Clinton. Their silence speaks volumes about their partisanship and lack of neutral standards of civil liberties.
  • Congress must act to prevent these abuses from recurring.
Judge T.S. Ellis (right), who presided over the first Manafort trial, observed that flipped witnesses sometimes have an inducement not only to "sing" but to "compose" -- that is, to embellish. (Image source: Fox News video screenshot)
The reasons given thus far for Roger Stone's pre-dawn arrest by armed FBI agents are utterly unconvincing. He was not a flight risk, as evidenced by the low bail and easy conditions of release set by the judge without objection from the government. Stone knew he was going to be indicted and if he wanted to flee, he had plenty of time to do so. The same is true of destroying evidence, wiping his electronics or doing anything else that would warrant an arrest rather than a notice to his lawyer to appear in court at a specified time. A search was conducted of various residences pursuant to a search warrant. No arrest was necessary to conduct these searches.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS

Donate




DC 'Antifa Leader' Charged With Ethnic Intimidation


We also bring you the latest on Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib

far-left-burns-confederate-flag-DC-Chip-Somodevilla-GI-1015774996-1024x600.jpg
News
DC 'Antifa Leader' Charged With Ethnic Intimidation Said to be part of a mob attack on Hispanic marines Read right-arrow.png
Rashida_Tlaib_at_campaign_hq-VOA-flickr-1024x600.jpg
News Analysis
damon-jospeh-1024-600-3.jpg
News
Ohio Man Indicted for Planning Mass Synagogue Shooting Clarion told authorities about him six months ago Read right-arrow.png
Rouhani-Erdogan-ADEM-ALTAN-AFP-GI-1074449766-1204x600.jpg
Video
'Biggest Threat to West Is Iran, Turkey Carving Up Muslim World' It will take an Iranian attack for people to wake up Watch right-arrow.png
US-Shopping-Mall-New-York-Spencer-Platt-Getty-Original.jpg
PVE
How Citizens Stop Terror Attacks You are the first line of defense against terror Read and Share right-arrow.png
Host-an-Event-NL.jpg
Readers Write
Philippines-security-checkpoint-Mindanao-MARK-NAVALES-AFP-GI-88918129-1024x600.jpg
“Coming to a neighborhood near you very soon if you don't wake up America”
- J.M.
Canada-Justin-Trudeau-Neil-Hall-Pool-Getty-1024-600.jpg
“We know he is naive, lacks experience and is out of his league. As far as this subject he may be truly naive or is part of the whole scheme and plan. We in the West need to be more than just aware. We need to do something about it.”
- L.S.
The Clarion Project is a registered 501(c)(3). Donations are tax deductible.

facebook.jpgtwitter.jpg







#NoHijabDay Campaign Fights Women's Subjugation, Indoctrination



Steven Emerson, Executive Director
January 30, 2019

#NoHijabDay Campaign Fights Women's Subjugation, Indoctrination

by Abigail R. Esman
Special to IPT News
January 30, 2019
Be the first of your friends to like this.

The first time my friend Nour appeared in public without her scarf, a neighbor commanded her to put it on. When she refused, he grew enraged. "Then you are no longer Muslim!" he called out after her as she continued down the street.
The year: 2008
The place: New York's ultra-hip East Village.
But when Canadian human rights activist Yasmine Mohammed removed her hijab during a 2004 visit with her mother in Vancouver, Canada, the fury was even greater. "That was the day," she recalled recently, "when my mother threatened to kill me."
Now, with worldwide demonstrations planned on Friday to celebrate Muslim women who choose to wear the hijab, Mohammed is leading a protest, instead, in support of those who don't.
"My aim isn't for women to leave Islam or become atheist," she explains, though she herself left Islam several years ago. "My aim is for women to just free themselves."
She is not alone. Mohammed's video last year showing herself burning a hijab in response to that year's World Hijab Day events attracted 3 million viewers. Now, many of them are joining her efforts, some publicly, others in private.
Many even got a head start, promoting their actions on social media, using the hashtags #FreeFromHijab and #NoHijabDay. Others post in celebration of Iranian activist Masih Alinejad, author of The Wind In My Hair and the mind behind such Muslim feminist movements as "My Stealthy Freedom" and "White Wednesdays," both of which call for an end to compulsory headscarf laws for women.
Vocal activists worldwide have also joined the call, such as writer Asra Nomani, who on NoHijabDay will join a livestream at bit.ly/NoHijabDayLive, and Ensaf Haidar, the wife of jailed secular Saudi blogger Raif Badawi, now living in Canada.
This is no small act. Many of these women, even those living in the West, have received death threats in response to their posts. Women in Iran and other countries where the hijab is mandatory know they risk arrest. But for them, the action is worth it – as evidenced in so many videos of unveiled women dancing.
Not all the activists agree about the reason for hijab: some, like Mohammed, insist that it is part of Islam, while others like Nomani are equally insistent that it is not. Writing in the Washington Post in 2015, Nomani noted that "the mandate that women cover their hair relies on misinterpretations of Koranic verses." Moreover, head coverings are discouraged and even banned in many Muslim countries, including Tunisia and Morocco.
What they do agree on, however, is the need for women to be allowed to choose, and an end to the threats that face so many Muslim women who prefer to follow their religion freely, and in their own way.
With World Hijab Day and NoHijabDay both around the corner, the Investigative Project on Terrorism spoke with Mohammed to get her thoughts on the movement, and the passion that inspired it.
(Note: the interview has been edited for length.)
To promote #NoHihabDay, Mohammed posted these before and after photos. Wearing a hijab was never a choice for her growing up.
Abigail R. Esman: Explain to me how this all came about.
Yasmine Mohammed: NoHijab started as a counter-protest to World Hijab Day, which is supported by 180 countries. To be honest, when I got onto social media I didn't know what this day was – it shocked me, I wasn't prepared for it. I was floored to see all of these women all over the Western world putting hijabs on, and I was so frustrated and enraged, so angered at what seemed like the indoctrination of the entire Western hemisphere.
So the next year, it was creeping up and I thought, I'm going to fight back this time. And so just a few days before World Hijab Day I announced that I was going to be burning a hijab and I wanted people to join me in protest of this idea that hijab is this completely innocuous piece of cloth. I wanted to stand in solidarity with the women who can be harassed and abused and imprisoned and even killed for not wearing it. Because that's what we should talk about.
So I burned a hijab with three other women. My video got 3 million views. All of us are coming from Islamic backgrounds, and one is still Muslim. And people started to see that it's insane that a 16-year-old girl can be killed in Canada and girls and women are killed all over the planet, for not dressing the way their family and government say they should dress.
This Jan. 1, they announced World Hijab Day and they announced their hashtag as #FreeinHijab, which made it so easy for us – we turned it into #FreeFromHijab and it has turned into an onslaught, with pictures from Saudi, Turkey, Kuwait, Canada, Sweden, France – all over the world, people posting. Some are in hijab, some are posting before and after pictures of hijab that they used to wear and the fact that they are now free from hijab. It gave women a chance to celebrate not only the mental constraints from the ideology behind wearing a hijab, but the physical constraint of wearing a cloth over their heads.

If it is just a piece of fabric, why are people being killed for not wearing it? Because it's a tool of modesty culture, it's a tool of subjugation, it dehumanizes her...

ARE: What do you say to those who say "it's just a scarf?"
YM (laughs): A lot of people say it's just a cloth, why are you worrying about a piece of cloth? Obviously we are not fighting about a piece of fabric. We are fighting about the mindset behind people wearing a piece of fabric. If it is just a piece of fabric, why are people being killed for not wearing it? Because it's a tool of modesty culture, it's a tool of subjugation, it dehumanizes her, it turns her into just another Muslim- looking thing where you can't have an individual thought or individual action.
Recently a Muslim woman in the UK, Dina Torkia, decided she wasn't going to wear a hijab anymore. Only when she felt like it. The amount of backlash she received – she was getting death threats on herself and her family, and rape threats. There is a video almost an hour of her reading all the hate she gets. This is how they treat their own when they decide not to wear a hijab, so how can you tell me it's just a piece of cloth? It's like saying a slave just has pieces of metal on his wrist. If a woman is able to free herself from wearing a hijab, she is freeing herself from so much more.
So with this campaign now I have the support of so many women. So when you are fighting the hijab you will have a lot of support of even fellow Muslims because it is a truth that women are forced to wear it. This is new news for the Western world because the Muslim world has tried so hard to hide that fact.
ARE: Do Westerners understand it this way?
YM: If you try fighting it specifically highlighting the fact that hijab comes from Islam, people shy away. They'd rather criticize the misogyny [behind it], but they don't want to criticize the root of it, which is Islam. And we have to do that. We have to hone in on the specific problem. If we talk just about misogyny, that's a huge story. Hijab is one piece.
But if that gives people the mental ability or excuse to work past that misogyny, tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself, tell yourself that it's not Islamic – whatever it is you want to tell yourself. I lived that life before and after, and I have paid an extremely high price. And a lot of people I know have paid extremely high prices for their freedom. But they will tell you that the cost of freedom, no matter what you have to pay, is worth it. That is the message I want to give to these women who are fighting, whether it is their husbands or their fathers or their communities or their government or even their best friends – whatever entity you have to fight for your freedom it will be absolutely worth it. I can promise them that. I can guarantee it. And I don't want them to waste their lives. I was almost 30 when I took off my hijab. I was so scared of making that move.
ARE: Have you had people contact you and say they want to, but they don't dare?
Oh, yes. Some will post, "oh, you're so lucky, I can't wait to feel that freedom you're talking about," and then someone will respond and say "why don't you?" And she'll say, "because my father will kill me," and Muslims will answer and say well, you deserve to die. So they can't theoretically daydream about freedom without having people heartlessly attacking them.
It's really shocking to be the recipient of that. You're still the same person, you just don't want to wear this thing on your head anymore. And suddenly you go from being their daughter whom they love and adore to being someone they want to kill.
ARE: Hijabs have become very politicized now. I know many women who wear it not for religious reasons, but to assert themselves as Muslims. Has that changed the environment at all?

YM: Yes. And it has been exacerbated by the fact that Western society feeds into that, because how do they show a Muslim woman? Wrapped in hijab. So they are supporting that stereotype that Muslim girls wear hijab. Girls these days are getting that message both from home and media – they're seeing girls on the runway, in GAP ads, in fashion magazines, all in hijab – and they're seeing it as something to be proud of, something to define them and make them stand out.
Whereas there is nothing a man has to do to constantly put himself front and center as just a symbol of this, and nothing else. When a Muslim woman puts on a hijab, she is nothing else. She's just a Muslim. That's why I say it's dehumanizing,
ARE: Many people will defend the wearing of hijab as a religious expression. How do you get across that wearing that a hijab is not like wearing a cross?
YM: I'm not a fan of banning it, because I know there will be a backlash that will only encourage people to wear it even more. I think it's more important to educate the women themselves, to see that they are indoctrinated. We will be on the sidelines cheering them on, but we can't be on the sidelines forcing them to take it off. It has to be a decision they make because they have come to that conclusion. That said, It's easy to convince a woman all this. The hard part is getting her to pay the price of making that decision.
ARE: Can we help make non-Muslim women understand what you're trying to make Muslim women understand, so they support them rather than enable them?
I would love that. Whenever I talk about this, the only thing that stops Westerners from completely agreeing with me is that there is religion involved. But if they are able to look at it objectively with all the things they understand about women's equality then they understand why the hijab is a dangerous tool of misogyny. In the Muslim community I find that harder, because in Arabic, the word "feminism" doesn't even exist. These are topics that have not even been broached before. So it's a much bigger battle on that side, because they have from birth accepted this indoctrination that they are lesser-than. So to come to someone who already believes that she is lesser-than, and believes it because the idea of defying the word of the creator means spending eternity in hell, it's hard to talk to her and tell her you are equal, and you deserve freedom, and you deserve rights. These are concepts that are totally foreign to her. Those are options for the non-Muslim women. When it is something you can never even attain because it is too far from your world, you don't even think about it – you just find a way to survive in your own world, whether it's cognitive dissonance or whatever. You find a way to survive in the world that you are in. So that's where the bigger fight is.

That basic need to be an individual, to be free, is in there.

ARE: There seems to be more and more interest in, even support for, the whole "modesty" thing among Westerners. You see it, as you mentioned, in fashion, but also other areas.
YM: I think Western people getting on the train with modesty culture is a very new phenomenon and I think it can be swatted away effectively if Muslim women start to show them what they're saying is not true. Mine is just one voice – but I want them to see and hear voices from all over the world, saying this in unison. And if you are a human being, then this is not difficult to understand. If you are a human being, then you know, someone telling you, whether it is your god, your government, your father or brother or husband, someone telling you what you're going to wear every day, is not something any human being desires or appreciates or wants.
ARE: I'm not entirely sure. Many women, especially converts, have talked about how much they prefer having these rules, these guidelines. They make them paradoxically feel even more free.
YM: But we have to fight that. Because I feel like that human need for freedom is in there. It might have been completely stifled out, but I feel like the pilot light is still burning, that the basic humanity that we all have, that basic need to be an individual, to be free, is in there.
Having said all that, I'm sure there are some people that really would make the choice to cover themselves head to toe. There are people who will kill themselves and their families for the sake of a cult. But we should not be celebrating that. So who are the women I will support and celebrate? The women who are fighting back and aligning with enlightenment values and these basic ideas of personal autonomy and freedom.
And even these women who spit back poison at me, I still know you're spitting back poison because you're trying to convince yourself and you're trying to convince your god, but I know, that deep down, the spark of humanity is still in there.
Abigail R. Esman, the author, most recently, of Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in the West (Praeger, 2010), is a freelance writer based in New York and the Netherlands Her next book, on domestic abuse and terrorism, will be published by Potomac Books. Follow her at @radicalstates.
The IPT accepts no funding from outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3 organization.  

202-363-8602 - main
202-966-5191 - fax

Justin Trudeau Has Betrayed Canadian Citizens & Legal Immigrants

Justin Trudeau Has Betrayed Canadian Citizens & Legal Immigrants


0 Shares

Every dollar spent on illegal border crossers is a dollar taken away from the needs of our citizens. And legal immigrants are being pushed back in line while illegal crossers unfairly jump ahead.

As the cost of Justin Trudeau’s failure to end illegal border crossings continues to rise, he’s desperate to try and create a divide between Canadian Citizens and Legal Immigrants.

Trudeau – and much of the establishment media – are doing that by purposely trying to make legal and illegal immigration seem like the same things, referring to it all as ‘immigration’ and ‘migration.’
This is being done so that Trudeau can falsely claim anyone against illegal immigration is also against legal immigration, and he wants to use that messaging to win the support of people who came to Canada legally.

However, the reality is that Trudeau’s open borders policies are a betrayal of both Canadian Citizens and Legal Immigrants.

Canadian Citizens are being betrayed because every dollar the government spends on illegal immigrants is a dollar that can’t be spent on Canadians. It means less for healthcare, less for infrastructure, less for the military, less for education, less for everything else.

Legal Immigrants are being betrayed because those who follow the laws, and those who want their family members to come to Canada legally, are being pushed back in line while illegal border crossers jump ahead. Essentially, those who follow the rules and show respect for Canada’s laws are being punished, while those who disrespect Canada’s laws are being rewarded.

So, as much as Trudeau is trying to deceive and confuse the issue, the reality is clear: When it comes to illegal border crossings, Canadian Citizens and Legal Immigrants are on the same side – united against Trudeau’s dangerous open border policies.

Spencer Fernando

Finland's Grooming Gangs


In this mailing:
  • David Brown: Finland's Grooming Gangs
  • Saied Shoaaib: The European Court of Human Rights Does Not Deserve Its Name

Finland's Grooming Gangs

by David Brown  •  January 30, 2019 at 5:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • Much of the coverage of the same problem in Great Britain said that Jay had accused the Rotherham council and police of failing to tackle sexual exploitation because of misplaced "political correctness." Yet Jay says those are not the words she would use: "I have an aversion to phrases like that," she said. Instead, she believes the Labour-dominated council turned a blind eye to the problem because of "their desire to accommodate a community that would be expected to vote Labour, to not rock the boat, to keep a lid on it, to hope it would go away."
  • What hits hardest in the little town of Oulu in Finland is a disturbing sense that history is repeating itself here and nothing has been learned from the well-documented lessons of the past. Instead there seems to be a hope that with a few overdue statements this problem will go back underground and the noise will go away.
  • In January, the Andalus Islamic Center of Kastelholm, in Helsinki's Puolinharju area, published a message to its followers on Facebook. It featured a picture of two lollipops. One was unwrapped, dirty and covered with insects; the other was not. "This is why the Hijab plays an important role in Islam," it said.
  • In January, the Andalus Islamic Center of Kastelholm in Helsinki's Puolinharju area, published a message to its followers on Facebook. It featured a picture of two lollipops. One was uncovered, dirty and covered with flies, the other was not. "This is why the Hijab plays an important role in Islam," it said.
In December 2018, police in Oulu, Finland reported the arrest of seven migrant men accused of repeatedly raping a ten-year-old girl. The police say the girl has allegedly been subjected to multiple sexual assaults over several months in the suspects' homes. (Image source: Pixabay)
Finland is a curious place. Tucked up under the arm of its celebrity sister Sweden and with Russia as a neighbour, it is one of the world's most northern and geographically remote countries. It takes a hardy kind of European to withstand the severe climate. The Finns in Oulu, the most populous city in northern Finland, go about their lives as normal in -25 degrees Fahrenheit.
With a national population of just over 5.5 million, trees easily outnumber people; two-thirds of this country is blanketed in thick woodland, making it the most densely forested country in Europe.
Yet, this strange, seemingly forgotten land has a hideously metropolitan problem: Finland's daughters are the target of grooming gangs.
In December 2018, Oulu police reported the arrest of seven men accused of repeatedly raping a ten-year-old girl. The police say the girl has allegedly been subjected to multiple sexual assaults over several months in the suspects' homes.

The European Court of Human Rights Does Not Deserve Its Name

by Saied Shoaaib  •  January 30, 2019 at 4:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • It is a shame that voices such as Bahiri's are being drowned out in the West, not only by fundamentalist Islamists but by liberal apologists -- and courts. Evidently they are more fearful of being called "Islamophobic" than they are of protecting the victims of radical Islamism.
  • The recent ECHR ruling against Sabaditsch-Wolff for speaking her mind about Mohammed's marriage to a little girl is not merely a slap in the face to freedom of expression in an academic sense. It also serves to keep silent all those Muslims who are physically and mentally victimized by the practices sanctified in the Quran and by those adopting the strictest interpretation of Quranic texts.
  • In so doing, the court is giving its stamp of approval for criminal practices, such as paedophilia. Crimes that victimize children must not be tolerated. The European Court of Human Rights does not deserve its name.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is giving its stamp of approval for criminal practices, such as paedophilia. Crimes that victimize children must not be tolerated. The European Court of Human Rights does not deserve its name. Pictured: A court room of the ECHR in Strasbourg, France. (Image source: Djtm/Wikimedia Commons)
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) recently ruled that referring to the Islamic Prophet Mohammed's marriage to a 9-year-old as paedophilia is "beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate."
As Judith Bergman explained in the wake of the October 25, 2018 judgement, which was handed down seven years after "free speech and anti-jihad activist, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, was convicted by an Austrian court of 'denigrating religious symbols of a recognized religious group'":
"Sabaditsch-Wolff was ordered to pay a fine of 480 euros and the costs of the proceedings. The Vienna Court of Appeal upheld the decision... Sabaditsch-Wolff then appealed... to the European Court of Human Rights. She stated that her right to freedom of expression, safeguarded in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had been violated."
Facebook
Twitter
RSS

Donate