Choices, Choices
November 5, 2009
Ever hear this argument:
Ancient religious texts like the Koran contain outdated ethical concepts. The Old Testament has brutal laws and violent
passages. As a result Christians and Jews don't follow them. Muslims are the
same as Christians and Jews; they pick what works and reject what doesn't work.
Why should Islam be considered any worse than other religion or cult?
The short answer is that Islam is not similar to anything else, including religions such as Christianity. As far as the Koran having any outdated ethical concepts, that is impossible. According to Islamic doctrine, the Koran is perfect, eternal and universal. It does not
contain the slightest error since contains the exact words of Allah. Hence,
it can never be outdated.
Also, the Koran is a derivative book. Every idea in the Koran, with two exceptions,
can be traced to earlier works. The two novel ideas in the Koran are that Mohammed
is the last prophet of god and that violent force, jihad, can be used to harm
those who don't agree with Mohammed. Violence against kafirs is systemic in
all of Islam's texts and forms a central theme.
Yes, the Old Testament has violence, but there is no real parallel to the Koran
and Islam. Look at the numbers. The violence in the Old Testament is limited
to a few verses. The violence in the Koran against the kafir (unbeliever) takes
up 61% of the text. Every mention of the kafir is brutal, condemning, pejorative,
hateful and threatening. The Hadith,
the Traditions of Mohammed, has 20% of its text devoted to jihad. The Sira,
Mohammed's life, has 70% of the text about Mohammed as prophet devoted to
jihad.
These numbers show that the analogy between the violence in the texts of the
Jews and Christians is vastly overdrawn.
The next suggested parallel between Islam and Christians is that both pick and
choose from their texts. Every Muslim believes that the Koran is perfect down
to the last letter. It does not have a single error. This makes it very difficult
to ignore.
But a Muslim does have a way to make choices that a Christian, Jew, Buddhist
or Hindu cannot. Islam has dualistic ethics. Muslims are all brothers and to
be treated as such. But there is no Golden Rule and a Muslim may choose to treat
the kafir badly or well, depending upon the situation and needs. That is the
nature of dualistic ethics.
Dualism also allows the choice of the Meccan Koran or the Medinan Koran. When
Mohammed was in Mecca, he was weak and attempted to get along with the Meccans.
This gives us the verses of tolerance. Later, in Medina Mohammed had power and
the Koran became cruel and vicious towards any person who denied Mohammed. So
every Muslim has the choice of tolerance and coexistence from the Meccan verses,
or any of the physical violence or hatred found in the Medinan Koran.
There is another choice that a person who claims to be a Muslim can make. They
may choose to be a kafir by ignoring an Islamic doctrinal point. It is very
odd, but people assume that every action by one who calls them a Muslim is pure
Islam. But the Koran condemns Muslims who make choices to imitate kafirs. This
condemnation extends to those who choose to apply the Golden Rule to kafirs.
So there are three kinds of Muslim, depending on their choices: Meccan Muslim,
Medinan Muslim and kafir Muslim.
There is a great danger in trying to understand Islam through Christianity or
any other Western idea or concept. The underlying assumption is that Islam is
similar or has parallels to kafir culture. This means that Islam does not need
to be studied, because it is "like" some kafir concept or institution
such as freedom and Christianity. This idea is false and has no supporting facts
to prove it. Islam is sui generis, unique, and without parallel.
Islam stands entirely on its own with a separate logic, reasoning and ethical
system. Islam must be studied on its own. In the end this means understanding
the themes of the Koran and the life of Mohammed found in the Sira and the Hadith.
Why is Islam worse than any other religion or cult? Simple, it is not a religion,
but a complete civilization that has a political doctrine of annihilating and
subjugating all kafir civilizations. This doctrine had been put into action
for the last 1400 years and has caused the deaths of 270 million kafirs.
Islam has annihilated entire civilizations. Take Afghanistan as an example.
Before, Islam invaded the civilization of Gandharva, it had been peaceful for
four centuries and was wealthy. Buddhism flourished and great art was produced.
Then came Islamic jihad and Ghandarva was destroyed down to the last work of
art and the last Buddhist. Today we have the armpit of the world-Afghanistan,
an Islamic nation based upon Sharia law and Islamic politics. Buddhism and Gandharvan
culture have been totally destroyed.
The political theory of Islam and its results correlate 100%. Of course, there
are some harmful and creepy cults, but, measured by results, they are not in
the same league as political Islam. Islam is the ultimate civilizational predator
and should receive most of the attention.
Today we have two choices in viewing Islam. We can see it as based upon its
doctrine and history or we can choose to see it on the basis of multiculturalism-all
cultures are equally valid. But Islam denies that all cultures are equally valid.
Islam insists that it is superior all other cultures. All cultures are not equally
valid and all other cultures must submit. It is the will of Allah, and it is
Sunna (the way of Mohammed). What is odd is that tolerant multiculturalists
defend the Islamic monoculture so much.
This means that we also have two other choices. Will kafirs ignore the threat
of total destruction or go on pretending that Islam is similar to other cultures?
Will we foolishly apply the Golden Rule to a civilization based on dualism and
hope to create an Islam that respects kafirs and treats them well? But Allah
hates kafirs and it is Sunna to immigrate, deceive and make the kafirs submit
little by little.
Choices: will we choose life or death for kafir civilization?
Bill Warner, CSPI
Permalink
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com Use and distribute
as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.
|
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment