Formerly "Hudson Institute, New York"
In this mailing:
- Khaled Abu Toameh: Jordan' s King Abdullah needs to wake up - Fast
- Ali Alyami: Accusation of Blasphemy in Saudi Arabia Means Death Sentence
- Phyllis Goldstein: Review of A Convenient Hatred
- Irfan Al-Alawi: Radicalization of Young British Muslims
- AK Group: Government Shields Intel by Changing Law
Jordan' s King Abdullah needs to wake up - Fast
by Khaled Abu Toameh
February 13, 2012 at 5:00 am
http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2846/jordan-king-abdullah-corruption
![]()
Be the first of your friends to like this.
In the end he will have to fire himself.
Facing growing criticism over lack of reforms and transparency, Jordan's King Abdullah has announced an unprecedented crackdown on corruption, sending a number of his former top government officials to prison.
But the clampdown has only increased the appetite of the Jordanians, who continue to press for harsher measures against senior officials suspected of embezzling public funds and abusing their powers.
The king's hitherto unsuccessful attempts to appease the protesters are designed first and foremost to prevent the Arab Spring from infiltrating the kingdom.
For the past several months, Jordan has witnessed weekly demonstrations calling for far-reaching reforms and end to financial corruption. Most of the protests have been initiated by the kingdom's powerful Muslim Brotherhood organization.
At the beginning, King Abdullah did not take the protests seriously. But when some Bedouin tribes who were known for their loyalty to the monarchy started joining the protests, the king finally began to realize that the situation in the kingdom is much more serious than he had thought.
Over the past year, King Abdullah has dismissed two governments in a bid to calm the situation, but to no avail. His recent decision to appoint Awn Khasawneh, a respected judge of the International Court of Justice, as prime minister, has also failed to put an end to the growing protests.
Although most of the protesters in Jordan have thus far avoided calling for regime change, a former parliament member broke the rules by publicly calling for toppling the monarchy.
The man, Ahmed Abbadi, was last week arrested by Jordanian security forces and is now facing up to 15 years in jail if convicted.
Abbadi hails from a powerful Jordanian tribe and his arrest has triggered street clashes between his supporters and police forces in the capital Amman.
Members of Abbadi's tribe have vowed to stage more protests until the former lawmaker is released.
Political analysts in Amman point out that the king is desperate to restore calm and order that he has gone as far as ordering his security forces to arrest some of his most trusted and loyal officials, including the former mayor of Amman, Omar Maani, and the ex-chief of General Intelligence, Mohammed Dahabi.
The two men were arrested on suspicion of financial corruption as part of the king's efforts to show that he is serious about reforms and transparency.
Some former prime ministers and cabinet ministers are also being questioned about their role in various corruption scandals over the past decade.
Yet all these measures have failed to convince the demonstrators that the king is indeed serious about improving the situation.
Each arrest and questioning has been followed by more demands from angry Jordanians.
Now many protesters are demanding that the king arrest Bassem Awadallah, one of his closest friends and a former minister of planning and head of the Royal Court, on graft charges.
A Jordanian journalist said that if the king continues to succumb to public pressure, "in the end he will have to fire himself."
True, King Abdullah has taken a number of measures to fight corruption in his little kingdom. But at the end of the day, Jordan is still far from becoming a democratic country.
This is a country where the king can appoint and fire prime ministers and governments and dissolve an elected parliament any time he wishes. And this is a country where the prime minister -- with the approval of the king, of course -- appoints newspaper editors and senior journalists.
King Abdullah's efforts to improve his image were recently marred by the sentencing of an 18-year-old activist to two years in prison for setting fire to a picture of His Majesty King Abdullah II.
The young man, Uday Abu Issa, was tried before a military state court, which found him guilty of "undermining the king's dignity."
The king would do well to realize that in the age of the Arab Spring, sending a young man to prison for burning the picture of an Arab leader will only add fuel to the fire. He also needs to understand that the rule of totalitarian autocrats in the Arab world is no longer acceptable.
If King Abdullah wants to survive, he must cede some of his powers, allow free and democratic elections for parliament and government and stop suppressing his critics. If he fails to wake up, Jordan could soon be taken over either by Islamists or the Palestinian majority.
Related Topics: Khaled Abu Toameh
Accusation of Blasphemy in Saudi Arabia Means Death Sentence
by Ali Alyami
February 13, 2012 at 4:45 am
http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2847/saudi-arabia-blasphemy-death-sentence
![]()
Be the first of your friends to like this.
PLEASE HELP? Updates on Hamza Kashgari's case and what you can do.
Forwarded email: "We have news from Hamza's lawyer that the Malaysian government is hesitant to deport Hamza because of the international pressure. Earlier today, his lawyer has informed us that he is being prepared for extradition to Saudi and a plane is ready and waiting for him. Please help us secure his safety by calling and sending requests of intervention to all of the people on your networks. His lawyer's information is listed, best regards."
This is the time to act against the Saudi and the rest of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation's war on freedom of expression and thought as stated in their UN Resolution 1618.
We will keep you posted regarding plans to demonstrate in front of embassies and the White House to expose OIC's war on freedom of expression worldwide.
==============
Hamza's Lawyer Contact info.
Muhammad Afiq Bin Mohamad Noor
Cell/ Home +6010 3666 434
Office no. +603-2095 2299
Fax no +603 2093 7670
Email: afiqmnoor@kesavan.com.my
Also
Malaysia Embassy in DC
Please contact Syyed Anwar, Director of Public Relations with home I have spoken about Hamza's
Phone: +1-202-5729700
Fax: +1-202-5729882
Email: malwash@kln.gov.my
New Zealand High Commission Kuala Lumpur
Craig.Wadsworth@mfat.govt.nz
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Malaysia
webmaster@kln.gov.my
Ali H. Alyami is Executive Director of the Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia.
Related Topics: Ali Alyami
A Convenient Hatred
The History of Antisemitism
by Phyllis Goldstein
Facing History and Ourselves, 2011. 432 pp. $17.95
Reviewed by Michael Curtis
February 13, 2012 at 4:30 am
http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2844/a-convenient-hatred
![]()
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Romans erected 2000 crosses outside Jerusalem on which to hang Jews a few years before Jesus was even born: a way of diverting attention from problems and the real causes of them.
Discrimination, prejudice, bigotry, intolerance, persecution, racism, and xenophobia have existed in all historical eras and in all countries in some form. However, there is something altogether distinctive in the extraordinary persistence of antisemitism, the hateful and hostile perceptions and persecution of Jews as individuals and as a collective group that has existed for thousands of years throughout the world up to the present. From a rational point of view this persistence is baffling because of the contradictory nature of the negative assertions about Jews, the way in which they are assessed by a standard not applied to others, and because that hostility is manifested irrespective of any particular behavior by Jews. No other group of people in the world has been charged with these characteristics. Antisemitism has been displayed in public life, the media, school text -books, the workplace, religious institutions, and in reference to Israel.
The new book, A Convenient Hatred: the History of Antisemitism, by Phyllis Goldstein, with a foreword by Sir Harold Evans, the distinguished journalist and editor, is a welcome addition to the literature on the subject. The book, sponsored by Leonard Stern, is published by the non-denominational educational and professional development organization, Facing History and Ourselves. The work is a valuable contribution not only in itself but also to the mission of the organization, enlightening the general citizenry on issues of racism, prejudice, and antisemitism.
Goldstein, a senior editor at the organization, traces the history of antisemitism throughout history, using memorable historical events and episodes to illustrate the diverse nature of antisemitism and to link the past to the moral questions we face today. She disarmingly acknowledges that others may differ in the choice of events to illustrate antisemitic behavior, and somewhat modestly suggests that the book is in many ways a primer to encourage readers to further investigate the subject.
Goldstein, aiming at a wide audience, writes in a clear, precise manner, in a tone that is devoid of polemics, ideology, or exhortation. She does however hope, perhaps idealistically, that the presentation of information about antisemitism and other hatreds and the way in which these hatreds are transmitted may help overcome them. She understands that myths and stereotypes become embodied in individuals, institutions, and classrooms, and then infect political and social leaders and action. She indicates the way in which antisemitism has ranged from rhetorical and polemical utterances and writings to discriminatory and punitive actions.
In his eloquent foreword Harold Evans, surprised by the widespread globalization of hateful antisemitism, regards it as a mental condition conducive to paranoia, impervious to truth, a very peculiar pathology that recognizes no national borders. Goldstein, starting with the antisemitism displayed over 2500 years ago in Elephantine, an island in the Nile in southern Egypt, puts this mental condition on display. Prejudice against Jews goes back to early history and is found in Egyptian, Greek, and Roman writings and actions, and in early Christianity. Behavior patterns, that have become familiar through two thousand years, were present in this early period, as for instance, in the burning of the Jewish temple and the use of Jews as scapegoats in the struggle between the rival Persian and Roman powers in Egypt. In Alexandria, in which Jews constituted 40 percent of the population, in 38 C.E. there was mob violence against Jews fed by false accusations, and the categorization of Jews as a "diseased race of lepers" by Apion, a Greek lawyer resident there. It was realized early that antisemitism was a convenient device for a leader or a group to unite adherents against a supposed enemy, a way of diverting attention from problems and the real causes of them.
Goldstein provides some interesting details while telling her stories. One of particular interest, in the light of events that would occur shortly thereafter with blame for the crucifixion of Jesus falling on the Jews, was the Roman action in erecting 2000 crosses outside Jerusalem on which to hang Jews, a few years before Jesus was born. She does not claim to be a deep specialized scholar, in the sense of Anthony Julius in his book on antisemitism in Britain, nor is she an expert in the many languages in which antisemitism has been expressed, but she has mastered the existing literature in English on the subject. She presents her thoughts in a readable style and systematic manner, and brings the subject up to date by relating the distortions of present day Holocaust deniers and the unpleasant fulminations of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran. Goldstein might have dealt more fully with the sordid record of the Mufti of Jerusalem, and with the present complicated interaction of antisemitism and anti-Zionism.
In this historical tour we witness the manifestations of antisemitism during the emergence of Christianity from the followers of the Jewish Jesus, the anti-Jewish laws issued by Emperor Constantine in 314 after his conversion to Christianity, the accusations of Jews as "Christ killers," the impact of Islam and its empires, the episode of the Crusades, the struggle between the new Protestantism and Catholicism, the mixed fruits of the Enlightenment, the false conspiracy theories of Jewish power, the distortion of race theories, the machinations of the Soviet Union, the abuse of international organizations, and the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Throughout 2000 years demonization, dehumanization, and discrimination against Jews have occurred. Goldstein illustrates this in the various chapters, in both familiar and less known issues: included are those in 167 A.D. on the charge of deicide or the murder of God; the burning of synagogues in Iraq in 388; the slaughter of Jews in the Rhineland during the first Crusade in 1096; the even greater slaughter by the leader of the Crusade of Jews in Jerusalem in 1099; the attacks on Jews by individuals and groups during the second Crusade in 1146-7; the imposition of special taxes on Jews and attempts to remove them from international trade; the incitements by John Chrysostom in Antioch in the late 14th century; the expulsion of Jews from England in 1290 and later from other countries including Spain in 1492; the charge in 1144 of ritual murder of Christians to obtain their blood; alleged responsibility for poisoning wells and the Black Death in the 14th and 15th centuries; the desecration of the host in the late 13th century; the insistence by the Church from the 13th century on that Jews wear clothing or head covering that distinguished them from Christians; the attacks on the Talmud and the burning of Jewish books in 1242 in Paris; the expulsion of Jews from Spain in 1492; forced conversions; the Inquisition in Spain in 1480 to deal with alleged false conversos by burning or torture (the notorious auto-da-fe, the burning of Jews at a public event); the insistence in Spain on purity of blood (la limpieza de sangre) which made race a major rationale for antisemitism; the assault of Martin Luther on the "damned, rejected race of Jews, "the prejudice of the Jesuits which lasted until 1946; the teaching of contempt of the Jews in church documents, a practice that was not disavowed until 1947; the inclusion of Jewish books in the Vatican Index of Forbidden Books in 1549; the confinements of Jews to ghettoes starting in Venice in 1516; the belief of Voltaire during the Enlightenment period that Jews "were ignorant and barbarous people;" the special clothing, hats, and even shoes Jews were obliged to wear in the Ottoman Empire; the massacres in the Ukraine in 1648; the second class status, dhimmis, of Jews under Muslim rule; the political use of anti-Jewish rhetoric by Tories against Whigs in the 1754 British election; the murder in 1840 of innocent Jews for the disappearance of a monk in Damascus; the refusal of many European countries to allow Jews to become citizens; the well known Dreyfus Affair in France in the 1890s; the pamphlet in 1878 by Wilhelm Marr which coined the word "antisemitism;" the racial theories of Ernst Haeckel; the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion produced by the Russian secret police and later publicized by Henry Ford and recently by Saudi Arabia and by Hamas in Gaza; the confinement of Jews to the Pale of Settlement in Western Russia and attempts to convert Jews to the Russian Orthodox faith; the pogroms (thunder) beginning in 1881 in Russia and continuing for over two decades and then resuming in 1917-9 in the Ukraine; the lynching of Leo Frank in Atlanta in 1913 for the murder of a 13 year old girl; the allegation of responsibility for the Russian Revolution and two World Wars; the Holocaust; the massacre in Kielce, Poland in July 1946; the ritual murder of Daniel Pearl in Pakistan in 2002; and the incessant condemnations of Israel since its establishment.
It is still difficult to provide a rational, unprejudiced explanation, economic, social, religious, or political, for the persistence of antisemitism. Why for example is antisemitism so deeply embedded in the culture of Spain since it is over 500 years since Jews were expelled from the country? Why did General George S. Patton in his diary on September 15, 1945 refer to Jewish DPs in the camps in Europe as "lower than animals?" The danger of antisemitism remains, in governmental actions, in international bodies especially those related to the United Nations, the Durban Conferences, and among those opposed to the existence of Israel. After centuries of animosity towards Jews displayed by Christian Churches it is saddening that Arab and Islamic organizations, influenced by the example of the Mufti of Jerusalem who called for the removal of Jews from Palestine, have now made antisemitic rhetoric and calls for action against Jews a significant part of their activity. Radical Islamists have linked anti-Semitism, or Judeophobia, to their disproportionate criticism and hostility to the state of Israel.
One must ask why international organizations, supposedly promoting and protecting human rights around the world, have been obsessed with condemning and demonizing the state of Israel for fifty years through one-sided resolutions and disproportionate criticism. The fantasy of Jewish and Israeli power and conspiracy reached an absurd climax when some declared that Jews were responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001.
In her book, Goldstein has made the horrifying history of antisemitism accessible to everyone. One can only hope that it will have a widespread readership and a salutary impact in changing opinions and behavior in public life, the media, schools, and religious institutions.
Michael Curtis is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University and a member of the Board of the American Israel Friendship League
Radicalization of Young British Muslims
by Irfan Al-Alawi
February 13, 2012 at 4:00 am
http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2842/radicalization-british-muslims
![]()
Be the first of your friends to like this.
University Islamic Societies Sow Terrorist Propaganda: "I started to get really into it [Al-Awlaki lectures]….everybody listens to him and likes him."
A newly-released study from the British organization Student Rights exposes a problem of which the moderate British Muslim community has been aware for years: the advance of radical ideology among young Muslims, through videos and direct preaching.
A report, "Case Study: London South Bank University Islamic Society," discloses that the London South Bank University (LSBU)'s Islamic Society (Isoc) has exploited social media to disseminate terrorist propaganda. The LSBU Isoc, an affiliate of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS), has long been known for harboring radicals and their sympathisers.
Nine times since November 2011, the LSBI Isoc has used its Facebook account to present video lectures by the late US-born Al-Qaeda preacher Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was executed in a US military drone operation in Yemen at the end of September 2011. That is,
after both Al-Awlaki's role in several terrorist attacks in the US and his death were widely publicized, the LSBU Islamic Society reposted his lectures. Al-Awlaki was the Al-Qaeda leader involved in inciting the mass attack by Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people were killed and 29 injured. Al-Awlaki played the same role in the Christmas 2009 attempt by Umar Farouk Abtulmutallub, a Nigerian Muslim extremist, to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight over Detroit, Michigan.
Al-Awlaki maintained relations with three hijackers involved in the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, DC. After 2001, Al-Awlaki relocated from the US to Britain, where he stayed until 2004, when he went to Yemen. While in Britain, Al-Awlaki addressed the 2004 annual conference of FOSIS, and was advertized as a participant in a series of talks organized by the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) and the University of London students' Islamic Societies. MAB, founded in 1997 by Kamal Al-Helbawy, a representative of the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK, is small but well-known for its fundamentalist outlook. The London South Bank University Isoc's Facebook page had 3,039 subscribers when it posted the Al-Awlaki videos. Student Rights noted in its survey that by reposting the Al-Awlaki videos LSBU-Isoc "clearly endors(ed) Al-Awlaki as an authority on religious and even political matters."
Roshonara Choudhry, a British-born Muslim of Bangladeshi background and a student at Kings College, London, in 2010 stabbed British Labour politician Stephen Timms, MP – fortunately without killing him. Choudhry told British police that she had been influenced by Al-Awlaki's videos. According to the London Guardian of November 2, 2010, she said to investigators, "I started to listen to Anwar Al-Awlaki lectures last year and then I started to get really into it and I listened to everything … like all of his recorded lectures that he made and that would have been like since November. I've been listening to him since November… everybody listens to him and likes him."
Al-Awlaki's sermons were also found to have motivated nine British Muslims -- grouped in London, Cardiff (Wales), and Stoke-on-Trent -- to plot bombings of the London Stock Exchange, Big Ben, the Houses of Parliament, the US Embassy, the home of London Mayor Boris Johnson, and two Jewish synagogues, among many other targets. Although the nine intended their spree to be carried out around Christmas 2010, they were arrested by British authorities. After being informed of their probable sentences, as their trial was about to begin they pled guilty in a controversial arrangement, and were sentenced on February 1, 2012. The ringleader of the group, Mohammed Chowdhury, aged 21 -- and, according to Court News UK, nicknamed "JMB" for Jaamat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh, an illegal Taliban-lining terror group - was told he would be jailed for no more than 13-1/2 years. Under British penal rules, however, he may be released after completing half his sentence, in less than six years, because of time he already served. The convicted men could have been sentenced to life in prison. The other five defendants pled guilty to lesser charges of "preparing a terrorist attack". All nine had originally claimed innocence in the conspiracy. Except for Chowdhury and two associates, who were born in Bangladesh and acquired British citizenship, the would-be terrorists were all British by birth.
The LSBU Isoc has also posted videos by one of the most notorious Saudi extremists, Aidh (Ayed) Al-Qarni, known for encouraging Saudi subjects to contribute to the defence of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq, and calling on terrorists to travel to Iraq to fight. Al-Qarni is infamous for the recklessness of his diatribes. In one example, he declaimed, "houses and young men must be sacrificed, throats must be slit and skulls must be shattered. This is the path to victory".
On January 6, 2012, LSBU Isoc hosted Murtaza Khan, another prominent radical, as a speaker. In 2007, the UK Channel 4 "Dispatches" documentary, "Undercover Mosque," recorded Khan asking, "For how long have we seen that our mothers, our sisters and our daughters have to go and uncover themselves in front of these filthy non-Muslim doctors?"
The susceptibility to such appeals of British Muslim youth, especially through the student societies linked by FOSIS, has been aggravated by the assault on British Islam by advocates for the Deobandi and Wahhabi sects, along with the Muslim Brotherhood. Islam in the UK is South Asian in its majority origins. People of Pakistani, Indian, and Bangladeshi ethnicity account for about three-quarters of Muslims in the UK, who total 1.5 to 2 million. Deobandism is a fundamentalist interpretation that first appeared in India almost 150 years ago and inspired the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Through the mass revivalist group Tablighi Jamaat (TJ), as well as in Deobandi madrassas [Muslim religious schools] in Britain, students are inculcated with fundamentalist views from an early age. Deobandi boarding schools in the UK, created on the model of the original Darul Uloom Deoband in India, include Darul Uloom London, located in Kent, and Darul Uloom Bolton. Darul Uloom Bury, near Manchester, the oldest, was launched in 1973.
Deobandi madrassas produce imams who press radical attitudes on British Muslims. Most British Muslims are moderate, traditional, and reject and resent the fundamentalist invasion. But in the streets of East London and other cities with large Muslim communities, Deobandi agitation is a daily fact of life. Student groups such as the Isoc at LSBU and others affiliated with FOSIS provide an alternative source for the transmission of radical doctrines.
It has been asserted widely that Deobandis now control a majority of British mosques. Although they may have gained institutional leverage, they have not won over the majority of British believers in Islam. Moderate British Muslims must take back our mosques and university student societies from the extremists and work to drive the Deobandis out of all positions they have captured.
Related Topics: Irfan Al-Alawi
Government Shields Intel by Changing Law
And more from the Turkish Press
by AK Group
February 13, 2012 at 3:00 am
http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2845/government-shields-intel-by-changing-law
![]()
Be the first of your friends to like this.
The National Intelligence Organization, or MİT, rejected Thursday an Istanbul prosecutor's invitation for its head to answer questions in an ongoing judicial process as the government lent its full support to the chief in an effort to avert the deepening crisis.
MİT head Hakan Fidan, as well as two former MİT officials, Afet Güneş and Emre Taner, did not appear in court to provide testimony Thursday. In an urgent move to avert the prosecution of the MİT officials, the Justice Ministry launched an initiative to amend both the MİT Act and the Penal Code in order to make probing intelligence members' probe more difficult.
The details of the amendment were specially crafted by Justice Minister Sadullah Ergin, who met with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan twice Thursday. In the first phase, Article 250 of the Penal Code, which gives broad autonomy for specially authorized prosecutors to prosecute whomever they want, could be changed. Second, the amendment will also include Article 26 of the MİT Act, which essentially says a MİT member could be prosecuted only with the prime minister's consent. This article could be rewritten to increase its scope to exempt MİT brass from being prosecuted.
Specially authorized Sadettin Sarıkaya's unprecedented move to summon Fidan and the two former MİT officials has shaken Ankara; some have speculated on the existence of a simmering power struggle within the state.
MİT's message came in the late afternoon as Fidan was meeting President Abdullah Gül and Erdoğan was meeting Ergin in an effort to put an end to the crisis between the country's most important institutions. Chief of General Staff Gen. Necdet Özel also visited Erdoğan just before the prime minister met with Gül.
A statement by the President's Office made public after the meeting said it was a routine weekly meeting and that the focus was on the latest developments. Gül is "closely watching the situation," according to the statement.
According to MİT's earlier message to the prosecutor's office, the MİT Act requires the permission of the prime minister before its members can be prosecuted. The organization also said that as MİT was located in Ankara an Ankara-based court should make the request.
Speaking at a conference in Istanbul Thursday, former deputy MİT chief Cevat Öneş said such a development "cannot even take place in Patagonia" -- a Turkish phrase to emphasize backwardness.
The incident displayed how much Turkey needs a "qualified democracy," Öneş added. Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdağ also defended Fidan, saying he "was just doing his job."
"It is MİT's primary task to infiltrate terrorist organizations and collect information on their plans. But if you mix apples and oranges and accuse people who are risking their lives in the service of the nation, that would be extremely wrong," Bozdağ told reporters.
Fidan, Taner and Güneş had been asked to give testimonies in the judiciary's wide-ranging investigation into the Kurdistan Communities Union, or KCK, the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party's, or PKK, alleged urban wing.
"What I see is that there is no crime committed [by MİT]. There is a duty done. I read comments suggesting that this duty constitutes a crime. But one cannot accuse people by comments but by law," Bozdağ said.
The prosecutors sought to question the suspects in relation to a number of claims, including charges pertaining to MİT operatives who allegedly transgressed their duties to infiltrate the KCK and gather intelligence by actually facilitating the KCK's administration instead, according to the Hürriyet Daily News.
Turkish Prime Minister Resurrects Debates on Islamification
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's comment that his government wants to "raise a religious youth" has touched a nerve in society, fuelling debates over an alleged "hidden agenda" to Islamize secular Turkey.
"We want to raise a religious youth," said Erdoğan, himself a graduate of a clerical school and the leader of the Islamist-rooted Justice and Development Party, or AKP, during a parliamentary address last week. "Do you expect the conservative democrat AK Party to raise an atheist generation? That might be your business, your mission, but not ours. We will raise a conservative and democratic generation embracing the nation's values and principles."
Erdoğan's remarks drew strong criticism from the staunchly secular Republican People's Party, or CHP, founded by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, with its leader calling him a "religion-monger."
"It is a sin to garner votes over religion. You are not religious but a religion-monger," said Kemal Kilicdaroglu, accusing Erdoğan of polarizing the country by touching its fault lines.
"I'm asking the prime minister: What can I do if I don't want my child to be raised as religious and conservative?" wrote prominent liberal commentator Hasan Cemal in the Milliyet daily. "If you are going to train a religious and conservative generation in schools, what will happen to my child?"
Columnist Mehmet Ali Birand also criticized Erdoğan this week in an article titled "The race for piety will be our end."
"What does it mean, really, that the state raises religious youth? Is this the first step towards a religious state?" he wrote in the Hurriyet Daily News. "Erdoğan must explain what he meant, otherwise a dangerous storm may erupt and go as far as fights about being religious versus being godless."
Neither religious nor political uniformity can be imposed on Turkey given regional, ethnic and sectarian diversity in the country, wrote Semih Idiz in the Milliyet daily on Tuesday. He said millions of people "have subscribed to secular lifestyles" even before the republic.
Erdoğan 's AKP has been in power since 2002 and won a third term with nearly 50 percent of the vote in the 2011 elections, securing 325 seats in the 550-member Parliament.
But since then, the influence of the military, considered as guardian of secularism, has waned. Dozens of retired and active army officers, academics, journalists and lawyers have been put behind bars in probes into alleged plots against Erdoğan 's government.
Critics accuse the government of launching the probes as a tool to silence opponents and impose authoritarianism. Secular quarters argue Erdoğan 's conservative government is also step by step imposing religion in every aspect of life, saying many restaurants already refuse to serve alcohol during Ramadan.
They also criticize recent changes to legislation under which religious school graduates will now be able to access any university branch they like, while in the past they had only access to theology schools.
Birand expressed fears that the changes would not be confined to this and would lead to censorship in television broadcasts. The Turkish television watchdog RTUK "will restrict all kissing scenes; they will confuse pornography with explicit broadcast and all television screens will be made pious," he added. "Then will come religious foundations. After them, it will be municipalities. All kinds of Koran teaching courses, legal or illegal, will mushroom."
Observers say Erdoğan 's message contradicts what he had said during a recent tour of Arab Spring countries, in September.
"As Recep Tayyip Erdogan I am a Muslim, but not secular. But I am a prime minister of a secular country. People have the freedom to choose whether or not to be religious in a secular regime," he said in an interview with an Egyptian TV station and published by the Turkish daily, Vatan.
"The constitution in Turkey defines secularism as the state's equal distance to every religion," he said in remarks that provoked criticism from the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
http://www.aa.com.tr/tr/kategoriler/politika/114339-baski-siyasi-parti-yontemi-olamaz
Armenians Take Action to Protect Shrines at Risk
Malatya Municipality's recent demolition of a "Final Prayer" chapel at an Armenian cemetery has spurred Armenian-Turks into action about other at-risk sites around the country.
"[The idea of establishing] a commission could perhaps gain currency, but we first need to take into consideration the situation that Turkey is [embroiled] in. The example of Malatya may not stick well everywhere," former Malatya Philanthropists Association, or HAYDER, head Garo Paylan told the Hürriyet Daily News.
"We used to have graves that are thousands of years old across Anatolia, but they were either paved over with roads or new buildings were erected on top of them. It is no longer possible to retrieve most of them, but we at least need to claim the remainder," Paylan said.
HAYDER, which first brought the matter of Armenian sites before the public's attention, continues receiving sporadic phone calls about the status of Armenian remnants elsewhere in the country.
"We are progressively evaluating the requests," Paylan said, adding that they were hesitant in taking any further steps at the moment. Denouncing as insincere the interest shown by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the Malatya Municipality in the chapel's demolition, Paylan also said they had made a retreat for fear of public reaction.
Turkish Foreign Minister Urges Syria Peace Meet on U.S. Visit
The international community cannot afford to watch the "massacre" taking place in Syria without acting, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said Thursday during a visit to Washington.
Davutoglu is urging an international conference to resolve violence that erupted when demonstrators last spring began demanding that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad be removed from office. The government crackdown on dissidents has killed more than 6,000 people since March 2011, according to human rights organizations.
"We cannot let Syrian people die every day and the international community will follow blindly," Davutoglu said during a lecture at George Washington University in the United States capital.
The Turkish government announced Wednesday it is trying to organize "as soon as possible" an international conference that seeks a peaceful settlement of the Syrian crisis. A peace conference also has supporters in the U.S. government, which is organizing its own meeting, called "Friends of Syria," among stakeholders in the uprising.
Davutoglu is scheduled to hold talks with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the Syrian crisis during his stay in Washington.
"We want to have an international platform if the UN doesn't function in that way, to show solidarity with the Syrian people against this bloodshed, massacre," the Turkish minister said.
He was referring to a United Nations Security Council vote last week that struck down a resolution calling for a transition in the Assad government to end the violence. Russia and China vetoed the measure.
Davutoglu did not give details on the location or date of the peace conference he proposes.
Turkey is a former ally of Syria but broke off relations because of the violent backlash against demonstrators by the Assad regime.
http://www.afp.com/afpcom/fr/taglibrary/thematic/politic
Turkish Envoy Can't Get Meeting with Al-Maliki
Turkey's ambassador to Baghdad, Yunus Demirer, has been unable to obtain an appointment with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki since taking office Dec. 1, 2011, the Hürriyet Daily News reported Thursday.
Demirer has met with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and Masoud Barzani, the president of the regional Kurdish administration, but has remained unable to meet with al-Maliki despite asking for a meeting.
Diplomatic relations between Iraq and Turkey are tense after al-Maliki accused Ankara of intervening in Iraq's internal affairs after a crisis erupted between Shiite and Sunni political groups.
Turkey's Voice Needed in NATO, Secretary General Says
Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Thursday that he had no doubts that the Turkish government would remain attached to NATO.
Answering questions of the Turkish media at the NATO headquarters in Brussels, Rasmussen said that they needed "Turkey's voice in NATO."
"Turkey played a crucial role during the Cold War. There is no need to say that Turkey played a key role in that term as a neighbor of the Soviet Union. We are in a new security climate following the Cold War and the latest developments indicate that Turkey could play a crucial role. What is happening in North Africa and the Middle East shows how strong a role Turkey could play. Aside from its geographic location, Turkey's historic, cultural and religious ties to the region will make Turkey play a vital role," Rasmussen said.
"I consider Turkey as a loyal ally that carries critical importance. I have close ties with Turkish President Abdullah Gul, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and National Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz ever since I have assumed the post of NATO Secretary General, Rasmussen underlined.
"I do know that Turkey is strongly attached to our alliance and I appreciate Turkey's important contributions to NATO operations.
"Turkey has made great contributions to NATO operations in the Balkans, Libya and Afghanistan. Turkey has made its territory available for a NATO missile defense system. Turkey has an important role in the alliance. Turkey will continue to play an important role for the security of the European Atlantic region. Within this frame, we need Turkey's voice in NATO, Rasmussen emphasized.
"NATO-EU ties could be carried further before the Cyprus issue gets resolved. I propose that the EU signs a security agreement with Turkey and admits Turkey into the European Defense Agency as a full member and, in return, Turkey accepts that the EU includes the Greek Cypriot side as one of its 27 members," Rasmussen said.
"NATO has no plans for an intervention in Iran or Syria. I call on the Tehran administration to act in conformity with its international obligations and the Damascus regime to meet the legitimate demands of its people," Rasmussen added.
Rasmussen will pay a trip to Turkey soon as part of activities to celebrate Turkey's 60 years in the alliance.
http://www.aa.com.tr/tr/kategoriler/dunya/114593-turkiyenin-sesine-ihtiyacimiz-var
Sarkozy Calls on Turkey to 'Face Its History'
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has again called on Turkey to "face its history" in reference to Armenian genocide claims stemming from the 1915 incidents.
France collaborated with the Nazis during World War II, but it later faced up to that period in history, the ntvmsnbc news Web site reported him as saying.
Sarkozy spoke Wednesday at the annual dinner honoring France's Jewish community. Before the dinner, Sarkozy met with Gilad Shalit, an Israeli-French soldier who was held hostage for five years by Palestinian militants, according to the Associated Press.
Shalit made an unusual public appearance, meeting with Sarkozy in his presidential palace in Paris. Shalit did not speak to reporters afterward but his father, Noam Shalit, said, "We are very moved."
Sarkozy praised Shalit for his "exemplary courage" and his parents for "their determination and their dignity in the face of the ordeal and the anguish," according to a statement from the president's office.
Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian has called on Israel to stop the "play of words" and recognize the Armenian genocide allegations, referring to a statement from the chairman of the Holocaust Institute, Israel Charny, Panarmenina.net reported.
Nalbandian quoted Israel Charny, founder and director of the Jerusalem Institute of Holocaust and Genocide: "Everyone in Israel must realize: Charny knew the meanings of both the Holocaust and the Genocide." Nalbandian was responding to his Israeli counterpart Foreign Ministe Avigdor Liberman, who suggested "the term Holocaust is inapplicable in reference to any other tragedy." Nalbandian said the term Holocaust was never used to describe the Armenian "genocide."
Libya, Turkey to Partner in Military Exercises and Strategy
Libyan Chief of General Staff Yussef al-Mangush said Libya would make partnership with Turkey both in military exercises and strategic area.
Al-Mangush told AA on Thursday that Libyan army would be in more communication with Turkish army in the coming period. Noting that the Turkish army had been extending support to the Libyan people from the beginning of rebuilding process of the country, Al-Mangush said they were planning to have Libyan soldiers trained by Turkish soldiers.
Al-Mangush said 6,000 uniforms and equipments and 30 vehicles sent by Turkey for Libyan soldiers were very important for them.
He noted that the Libyan army entered a reconstruction period after the 42-year rule of Moammar Gadhafi ended, saying they would train Libyan soldiers in many countries like Turkey and Jordan.
http://www.aa.com.tr/tr/kategoriler/dunya
Turkey, Iran Diverge Over Syria
Turkey and Iran, regional heavyweights and heirs to imperial pasts, expanded trade in the past decade and papered over their traditional rivalry with diplomacy and rhetoric. Now these neighbors have staked out opposing positions in Syria, where outside players seek to sway an outcome to the bloodshed that could, in turn, alter power balances in the Middle East.
Iranian-Turkish tension could grow if regional efforts to end the violence intensify as expected after Russia and China vetoed a United Nations resolution calling for the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Ankara wants him to leave, while Tehran supports him. At the same time, they want to preserve warm ties that mask fundamentally different tactics and visions.
Turkey's willingness to clash over Syria is likely to be tempered by reliance on Iran for one-third of its oil supplies, as well as natural gas, that have helped to power its impressive economic engine. The Turks have also sought to make mediation a centerpiece of foreign policy, and that includes hopes for a diplomatic solution to the dispute over Iran's nuclear program.
http://www.todayszaman.com/news-271010-turkey-and-iran-diverge-over-syria.html
Baku Doubts Paris' Role
Baku is mulling whether to move to end France's role in the Minsk Group, which is tasked with solving the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, on the grounds that it has lost its impartiality following legal moves in favor of its strong Armenian diaspora.
"The Minsk Group has 15 members and Turkey is part of it, too. [France's position as the body's co-chairman] could be brought to the agenda of the group either by Turkey or by Azerbaijan," Azerbaijani Ambassador to Turkey Faik Bagirov told the Hürriyet Daily News in an interview Wednesday.
The Minsk Group was formed by the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe, or OSCE, in 1992, with the task of resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh problem between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Alongside France, Russia and the United States are co-chairs of the group, which has been mediating for the last two decades without any solid success. France's recent attempt to punish denials of the 1915 incidents as genocide caused a reaction both in Ankara and Baku and has brought its role as a mediator into question.
"The Minsk Group was formed March 24, 1992; thus we are commemorating its 20th year. A meeting could be held on this occasion in which France's role would be discussed as well. It's no doubt that France's neutrality is already a matter of question," Bagirov said, but added that there was no clear procedure on how to expel a co-chairing country.
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu said France would no longer play a constructive role in the South Caucasus since it had already shown itself to be pro-Armenian.
"Of course, 20 years is a very long time. The group whose task was to find a solution to this problem failed to do so. In the meantime, some acts taken by France only helped Armenia to distance itself from the main principles of international law and to ease its hands in negotiations," the ambassador said.
Bagirov said Azerbaijan was also closely following France's legislative process with particular attention to the Constitutional Council, which will decide whether or not the "genocide" denial bill is admissible.
"From the very beginning, we have said this attempt was in violation of democratic principles and freedom of expression," Bagirov said, expressing his disappointment over media claims that Baku did not exert enough efforts to stop the legislation in France.
"I want to underline this fact: No country in the world other than Azerbaijan supported Turkey in this process. Not a single country of the Islamic Conference Organization [lent it support]. It was only Azerbaijan which gave this support because our ties are based on brotherhood and friendship," he said.
For Bagirov, those who planted the idea of a lack of Azerbaijani support among the Turkish public were members of "some hostile circles who tried to sow discord between Turks and Azeris."
"Their purpose is to damage Turkish-Azeri friendship. The media should be very careful in regards to internal and external attempts to this end," he said.
One of the fault lines between Turkey and Azerbaijan was observed during the unfinished reconciliation process between Ankara and Yerevan in 2009. Though the two countries signed two protocols to normalize ties and open their sealed border, Turkey refused to ratify the agreements due to strong Azerbaijani reaction.
"Consider if these protocols had been approved," he said, noting that they would have only served to support "an occupying state." "The Turkish Republic openly understood this."
Touching on an end to visa requirements between Ankara and Yerevan, Bagirov said the process could be completed by the end of the year after Azerbaijan harmonizes its relevant laws. The issue will be raised during a high-level strategic council meeting that is expected to be held in the coming months.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/baku-doubts-paris-role.aspx?pageID=238&nID=13441&NewsCatID=355
Related Topics: AK Group
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php

No comments:
Post a Comment