Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Eye on Iran: Sanctions Push Iran's Oil Exports to Lowest in Decades










For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

Reuters: "Western sanctions drove Iran's crude exports to the lowest in decades in May, according to industry sources and tanker-tracking data, even before Washington toughens measures aimed at squeezing oil sales further. Crude shipments dropped to 700,000 barrels per day (bpd) last month, the data from sources showed, about a third of Iran's oil exports before the current round of sanctions. U.S. and European sanctions aimed at pressuring Tehran over its suspected pursuit of nuclear weapons have already more than halved Iran's shipments - costing Iran billions of dollars in revenue since the start of 2012. And Washington is now seeking to cut shipments to less than 500,000 bpd through tighter sanctions." http://t.uani.com/13l81kv

AP: "Several countries monitoring Iran's nuclear program have picked up information that the country's only power-producing nuclear reactor was damaged by one or more of several recent earthquakes, with long cracks appearing in at least one section of the structure, two diplomats said Tuesday... Its Bushehr nuclear plant is not considered a proliferation threat. But some nations are concerned about how safe it is. Iran has refused to join an international nuclear safety convention and persistent technical problems have shut the plant for lengthy periods since it started up in September 2011 after years of construction delays... But Iran insists the plant is technically sound and built to withstand all but the largest earthquakes unscathed. Officials in Tehran reassured the international community after the quakes struck in April and early May that the facility was undamaged. The diplomats referred to recent restricted information gathered from the site in questioning that assertion. They told The Associated Press that one concrete section of the structure developed cracks several meters long as a result of the quakes on April 9 and April 16." http://t.uani.com/15Ivugf

BBC: "Tens of thousands have attended the funeral of a senior dissident cleric, in what became Iran's biggest anti-government protest for years. Ayatollah Jalaluddin Taheri died at the age of 87 on Sunday in Isfahan. He was a vocal opponent of the hardliners in power in Iran and had resigned from his post in protest. Mourners at the funeral chanted slogans against the government and Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, describing him as a dictator. Protesters also called for the release of all political prisoners, including the two top leaders of the reformist green movement who are under house arrest in Tehran. Ayatollah Taheri was a pro-reformist Friday prayer leader in Isfahan, one of the largest cities in Iran. It is the biggest such protest in Iran in the past few years, and interestingly the police did not intervene, says Kasra Naji of BBC Persian." http://t.uani.com/19IsHX8
Election Repression Toolkit    
Nuclear Program

Reuters: "The United States said on Wednesday it was 'deeply troubled' by Iran's plans to start a reactor in 2014 that could yield nuclear bomb material while failing to give U.N. inspectors necessary design information about the plant. The comments by a U.S. envoy to a board meeting of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) highlighted deepening Western concern about the heavy water reactor which Iran is building near the town of Arak... Iran says the Arak plant will make isotopes for medical and agricultural use. But analysts say this type of facility can also produce plutonium for weapons if the spent fuel is reprocessed - something Iran says it has no intention of doing. Tasked with ensuring that nuclear material is not diverted for military purposes, the IAEA says Iran must urgently give it design data about Arak, warning that it would otherwise restrict its ability to monitor the site effectively. 'We are deeply troubled that Iran claims that the IR-40 heavy water reactor at Arak could be commissioned as soon as early 2014, but still refuses to provide the requisite design information for the reactor,' Joseph Macmanus, the U.S. ambassador to the IAEA, told the 35-nation Board of Governors... To signal big power unity on Iran, China and Russia joined four Western powers in pressing Iran at the IAEA meeting to cooperate with a stalled investigation by the U.N. nuclear agency into suspected atomic weapons research by Tehran. In a joint statement, the six powers said they were 'deeply concerned.'" http://t.uani.com/ZOuHLq

Sanctions

NYT: "The United States on Tuesday blacklisted what it described as a global network of front companies controlled by Iran's top leaders, accusing them of hiding assets and generating billions of dollars' worth of revenue to help Tehran evade sanctions over its disputed nuclear program. The action, by the Treasury Department, was one of the broadest in the American-led effort to isolate and pressure Iran economically and came as Congress is moving toward enacting even harsher penalties on Iran. It was the fourth time in a week that the Obama administration had escalated the sanctions and the first time it accused Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of directing an effort to bypass them. 'Even as economic conditions in Iran deteriorate, senior Iranian leaders profit from a shadowy network of off-the-books front companies,' David S. Cohen, the Treasury under secretary who oversees the sanctions effort, said in a statement. The Treasury identified 37 companies, including enterprises in Germany, South Africa, Croatia and the United Arab Emirates, that it said operated as a labyrinth of 'ostensibly private businesses' directed by the Execution of Imam Khomeini's Order, run by Ayatollah Khamenei." http://t.uani.com/11kvS0h

WashPost: "The workers at a gas tank factory in Dinslaken, Germany, had questioned the strange goings-on at their company ever since its Iran-linked owners bought it a decade ago. On Tuesday, they got an answer. The U.S. Treasury Department announced that MCS International, along with companies in Croatia, Dubai and elsewhere, had been part of a global network of 37 businesses designed to funnel profits and materials to the Iranian government and to evade sanctions targeting the country's nuclear program... MCS ended production at the end of March after years of unprofitability. Workers said their managers appeared uninterested in the business side of the company and instead focused on using technology from the plant to create a similar factory in Iran. Nuclear experts say the high-strength carbon fiber used at MCS to make lightweight high-pressure tanks is also useful for building precision centrifuges and missiles." http://t.uani.com/18Oeo1C

Reuters: "U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is likely to renew waivers on Iran oil sanctions for India, China and several other countries as soon as Wednesday, in exchange for their reducing purchases of crude from the Islamic Republic, two government sources said. The 180-day exceptions to the oil sanctions would be the third round since President Barack Obama signed the bill in late 2011. The Obama administration issued waivers on the sanctions to Japan and 10 European Union countries in March. The oil sanctions are one of the main tools Washington has for its strategy of trying to choke off funding to Tehran's nuclear program." http://t.uani.com/15AV9Xt

June 14 Elections

Daily Telegraph: "Iran has witnessed a rare show of political dissent in the run-up to next week's presidential election after mourners chanted anti-regime slogans at the mass funeral of a dissident cleric, according to amateur video footage. Chants of 'death to the dictator' and 'dictator, dictator, may your sleep be disturbed' were heard on videos of the funeral procession in Isfahan, Iran's second city, following the death of Ayatollah Jalaluddin Taheri, who died on Sunday, aged 87. The footage - whose authenticity cannot be verified - also contained chants in support of Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, presidential candidates in the country's fraud-tainted 2009 election, who have been under house arrest for more than two years. Marchers were heard on one video chanting: 'Mousavi and Karroubi must be released.' There were no reported arrests or clashes between mourners and security forces, a possible sign that the authorities are wary of disturbances before the June 14 poll." http://t.uani.com/17oxTQE

Reuters: "With 10 days until Iran's presidential election, voters have been able watch the candidates in debate, but many remain unenthused, believing the result will depend not on those on the platform but on powerful men in the background. The Revolutionary Guards, a military force over 100,000 strong which also controls swathes of Iran's economy, is widely assumed to have fixed the vote last time around, silenced those who protested and to be preparing to anoint a favored candidate this year, having already narrowed down the field. The successor to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who steps down after a second term, will remain subordinate to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And many see the hand of the Guards, the muscle of the Islamic Republic's clerical rulers, in steering victory toward one of several conservative loyalists -while stifling the kind of protests that followed the 2009 vote." http://t.uani.com/12snHpt

WashPost: "In Iran's first 2013 presidential debate Friday, candidate and Tehran mayor Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf looked poised and prepared. While the other seven candidates seemed flustered by the format, which some of them called 'insulting,' Ghalibaf regularly consulted a tablet that appeared to be an Apple iPad and spoke with certainty to the cameras. 'The first thing that my government will do is to stabilize the currency. The second is to change the method of distribution of services and goods,' Ghalibaf said, referring to some of the most pressing problems of Iran's battered economy. 'Today we need the trust of our people. My government will achieve this in six months.' If polls are any guide - and in Iran, they are far from reliable - Ghalibaf might have reason to exude confidence. Less than two weeks before Iranians vote , several online surveys conducted by Iranian news Web sites place the technocrat as a top contender in the field of eight conservative candidates vying to replace President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. This week, 150 members out of 290 in Iran's parliament signed a letter officially endorsing him." http://t.uani.com/138J3TI

Domestic Politics

FT: "With this month's presidential election less than two weeks away, the windows of the ironware shops in Tehran's Grand Bazaar should be pasted thickly with campaign posters. Instead, however, many of the shop windows are featuring simple A4 sheets of paper with typed announcements of their closure or sale, testimony to a quiet revolt now under way by the city's influential bazaaris, the shopkeepers and small business owners who have long formed the core of its business community. The immediate reason for the revolt is a move by the government of Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad to increase taxes on the bazaaris as part of an attempt to plug the gap left by Iran's falling oil revenues. The government increased taxes by 30 per cent last Iranian year and it has unveiled plans to raise them by another 38 per cent this year. The result, the bazaaris say, is that it now makes more sense to shut up shop than continue doing business and anticipate a visit from the tax man... The tax rises have been the result of Iran's changing realities. Iranian governments have usually enjoyed easy income from oil sales and adopted a relaxed attitude toward tax collection. But the combination of US financial sanctions and an EU ban on Iranian oil imports has caused the government to put more focus on collecting taxes." http://t.uani.com/18VtFAj

Human Rights

Fox News: "The wife of an American pastor imprisoned in Iran for his Christian beliefs delivered an impassioned plea to foreign diplomats gathered in Geneva, begging them to press the Islamic republic to free her husband. Naghmeh Abedini, whose husband Saeed Abedini is serving an eight-year sentence in Tehran's notorious Evin prison, told members of the United Nations Human Rights Council to join her 'in crying out against his persecution.' 'My husband, a U.S. citizen and loving father of our two young children, has been held in Iran's brutal Evin Prison because of his faith -- without a voice to fight for his freedom,' she said in testimony Tuesday morning. 'I must, therefore, be his voice.'" http://t.uani.com/19IqRW7

Opinion & Analysis

UANI CEO Amb. Mark Wallace in The Daily Caller: "In the coming days, Iran will hold its so-called presidential election to replace the outgoing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It will no doubt be a fraudulent and undemocratic process, resulting in one of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's hand-picked loyalists assuming the post. And while there is little that can be done at this point to affect the already-rigged election's outcome, at least one high-profile American corporation - Facebook - can take a stand for political freedom and free speech by carrying out the responsible action of disassociating itself from Khamenei. Khamenei and the Iranian regime are currently using Facebook as a platform to spread hateful propaganda, even while blocking Iranian citizens' access to the site. The Supreme Leader of Iran and social networking might seem like an odd fit, particularly given that the regime has attacked Facebook as 'the West's weapon in its soft war against Iran.' Nonetheless, for many months the regime has been operating a page for Khamenei, in open defiance of Facebook's terms of use, which bar threatening speech and graphic gratuitous images. For example, as Americans were celebrating Memorial Day last month, Khamenei's page featured the post: 'Those objecting [to the] Iran election Mechanism bear stigma of shame about #Guantanamo, having their #Drones over civilians plus a full support for criminal Zionists.' The words were strategically posted alongside a photo collage of bodies of dead children, a mushroom cloud, and President Obama greeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Such online activity is not only offensive, but highly hypocritical, as Khamenei and his cohorts have gone to great lengths to block Facebook for the Iranian public and punish users that circumvent the regime's invasive online filtering system. Following the disputed June 2009 presidential elections in Iran - when tens of thousands of Iranians used Facebook to voice their dissatisfaction and organize rallies in protest - the regime established its 'FATA' cyber-police unit, to 'take on anti-revolutionary and dissident groups who used Internet-based social networks in 2009.' Now, Iranians risk arrest, torture, and death for using Facebook, particularly when such use is determined to be political or 'un-Islamic.' For example, in May 2011, Baha'i activist Houshang Fanian was sentenced to an additional year of prison for 'disseminating anti-state propaganda on Facebook,' while Iranian authorities imprisoned a man in 2012 for the Facebook activities of his son, who was studying abroad in the Netherlands. In the most notorious case, FATA tortured Iranian blogger Sattar Beheshti to death in November 2012 for criticizing the Iranian government on Facebook. On May 20, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) wrote to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to call his attention to this matter. We requested that Facebook 'take immediate action to suspend the Facebook account of Ayatollah Khamenei ahead of the June 14, 2013 presidential elections,' noting that 'Facebook is illegal to Iranians and its usage has led to the unjust imprisonment, torture, and death of many activists.' Many have subsequently joined UANI's 'Kick Khamenei off Facebook' petition page and reported Khamenei's page to Facebook for violating the site's prohibition on 'hate speech' and 'violent or hateful behavior.' Unfortunately, Facebook has not yet taken the responsible action of deactivating Khamenei's account. In fact, the company has not responded at all, despite numerous inquiries from UANI supporters and other parties." http://t.uani.com/18OhuCW

Vali Nasr in Bloomberg: "Syria's uprising offered the possibility of a strategic defeat of Iran. In this scenario, Iran would be weakened by the collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime, its single Arab ally and a vital link to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia. Isolated, Iran would become more vulnerable to international pressure to limit its nuclear program. And as Iran's regional influence faded, those of its rivals -- U.S. allies Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia -- would expand. Instead, events in Syria are spinning in Iran's favor. Assad's regime is winning ground, the war has made Iran more comfortable in its nuclear pursuits, and Iran's gains have embarrassed U.S. allies that support the Syrian uprising. What's more, Iran has strengthened its relationship with Russia, which may prove to be the most important strategic consequence of the Syrian conflict, should the U.S. continue to sit it out. Part of the U.S. calculation in declining to intervene has been the assumption that Assad would inevitably fall. The U.S., apparently, did not consider the implications of leaving the door open to a comeback by Assad... Part of the U.S. calculation in declining to intervene has been the assumption that Assad would inevitably fall. The U.S., apparently, did not consider the implications of leaving the door open to a comeback by Assad... The U.S. may be content to leave the Middle East and its troubles behind, but that feeling will be short-lived if the legacy of its Syria policy is a region dominated by an aggressive Russian-Iranian axis." http://t.uani.com/15IynO7

Dennis Ross in Foreign Affairs: "The exclusion of Rafsanjani allows the Supreme Leader to avoid the uncertainty of an election in which the Iranian public again becomes energized. Clearly, the Supreme Leader wanted to avoid the kind of excitement that Rafsanjani would have stirred up had he continued making public statements, as he has over the last two years, about Iran's need to fix the economy and reduce Iran's isolation internationally (a theme he has emphasized in recent years). But the exclusion of Rafsanjani from the election is also an important signal to anyone concerned about Iran's nuclear program. If the Supreme Leader had been interested in doing a deal with the West on the Iranian nuclear program, he would have wanted Rafsanjani to be president. I say that not because Rafsanjani would have been capable of initiating a deal on his own -- any deal he might strike would still have to be acceptable to the Supreme Leader -- but because if the Supreme Leader were interested in an agreement, he would probably want to create an image of broad acceptability of it in advance. Rather than having only his fingerprints on it, he would want to widen the circle of decision-making to share the responsibility. And he would set the stage by having someone like Rafsanjani lead a group that would make the case for reaching an understanding. Rafsanjani's pedigree as Khomeini associate and former president, with ties to the Revolutionary Guard and to the elite more generally, would all argue for him to play this role. Rafsanjani's exclusion is not the only signal that spells trouble for a nuclear deal. Of the eight remaining approved candidates, there are four who are close to the Supreme Leader and might have credibility negotiating: Ali Akbar Velayati, a foreign policy adviser to Khamenei; Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, the Mayor of Tehran and a former commander in the Revolutionary Guards; Hassan Rowhani, a cleric and former Iranian negotiator with the Europeans on the Iranian nuclear program; and Saeed Jalili, Khamenei's current representative in the nuclear talks with the P5 plus 1 -- the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany. While any of these candidates could in theory win the election, the fact that the Iranian media is lavishing attention on Jalili certainly suggests that he is Khamenei's preference, even though he has the thinnest credentials of the lot. If Jalili does end up becoming the Iranian president, it will be hard to avoid the conclusion that the Supreme Leader has little interest in reaching an understanding with the United States on the Iranian nuclear program. Jalili, by all accounts, has consistently approached the talks with ideological fervor, complete commitment to the Supreme Leader's guidance, and readiness to talk forever without results. His campaign now is built around the theme of resistance -- so much so that he speaks not just of resistance to the 'arrogant powers' internationally and by implication on the nuclear issue but also of building a 'resistance economy.' The latter slogan may not reassure the Iranian public, but it is music to the ears of Ali Khamenei. Should Jalili become Iran's next president -- and his slavish devotion to the Supreme Leader makes him the ideal candidate for Khamenei -- we won't have to guess about Khamenei's intentions in nuclear negotiations. He will be telling us." http://t.uani.com/18OfISp

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment