by Judith Bergman
• February 25, 2017 at 5:00 am
- "Selling the
crucial manufacture of vaccines to an ideologically hostile country,
which might - for whatever reason – suddenly decide to shut down
production, does not sound like a good idea... Those who say that the
Saudis are merely interested in profit, just like everybody else,
should know better". — Rachel Ehrenfeld, expert on financing
terrorism
- Virtually all
political parties supported the Danish government's sale of its
vaccine manufacturing facility to the Saudi conglomerate.
- After the
publication of the Danish Mohammad cartoons in 2006, Saudis boycotted
Danish goods. Do Danish politicians really have such short memories?
- Vaccines are not an
easy commodity to come by. It takes minimum six months for an order of
vaccines to be delivered, but, according to the World Health
Organization, delivery can also easily take up to two years.
- How much trust
are Danish consumers supposed to have in a Saudi owned conglomerate,
which employs jihadists such as Usmani and donates heavily to jihadist
organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, who want to bring about
a caliphate? The potential for political exploitation is too evident
to reject.
Denmark's Statens Serum Institut (State Serum
Institute). Image source: Wikimedia Commons/Froztbyte.
Would you want your vaccines produced by a Saudi company that supports
jihad? Danes, it seems, may have no choice.
Denmark recently sold its state-owned vaccine manufacturing facility
to a conglomerate owned by the Aljomaih Group, a Saudi family dynasty[1]
led by Sheikh AbdulAziz Hamad Aljomaih. The sheikh is also the largest
single stockholder and chairman of Arcapita Bank, (formerly First Islamic
Investment Bank) headquartered in Bahrain. As an Islamic bank, it has a
so-called Sharia Supervisory Board comprised of Islamic scholars, who
ensure that the bank's activities comply with sharia (Islamic law).
Former Islamic judge and leading Islamic scholar Taqi Usmani, who sits
on the bank's Sharia Board, in his book, "Islam and Modernism",
writes ruminations such as: "Aggressive Jihad is lawful even today...
Its justification cannot be veiled..."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment