Notre Dame Engulfed: ‘Fire Jihad’ Leads The Way & Civilizational Jihad Verboten – The Unspoken Truth(s). Commentary By Adina Kutnicki
LADIES & GENTS, let’s face facts, discomfiting and
disquieting as they are: you know that things are going to hell in a
hand-basket when FOX News, the last bastion of non-PC truth-telling,
has issued an omerta regarding the Islamic menace. Yes, “it be” true.
Still yet, the truth has a way of seeping out, even with a (deadly)
silencer in place. Wait and see. Follow the trails until the bitter end.
ALAS, the anchor exposed himself
for what he is: an overgrown man in sissy pants. But never mind.
Besides, it should hardly come as a shock, that is, because an omerta
has been handed down from atop FOX’s hierarchy of poohbahs, oops,
censors: don’t “offend” Muslims/Islam! Period.
HOT on Cavuto’s heels, Shep Smith, another gutless FOX anchor, chimed in and reacted on cue:
Shepherd Smith on Monday was interviewing French official Philippe Karsenty, who said the cathedral had been there for 850 years and “even the Nazis didn’t dare to destroy it.”
“You need to know for the last year we’ve had churches desecrated,” Karsenty said. “Of course you will hear the story of the politically correct which will tell you it is probably an accident.”
At which point Smith cut him off with, “Not on my watch.”
However, police reported that in just one week in March, a dozen Catholic churches in France were vandalized, including by fire…..
AS always, denial is a river.
INDEED, after Judge Jeanine Pirro “dared” to point out the obvious re hijabi-wearing Islamist Rep Omar, guess what happened? FOX suspended, humiliated, and, effectively, muzzled Pirro (by extension, others alike) from ever touching upon Islamic truth-telling!
NATURALLY, the fact that FOX’s Muslim Producer, Hufsa Kamal Khan, was “offended”, and Neil Cavuto, Shep Smith, as well as Brett Baier flanked her (for political gain, but that’s for another airing), well, what else is there to say?
SO, once again, alternative media is consigned to execute the heavy-lifting – the role which should be played by the heretofore “third estate”, but no matter. Regardless, let’s get on with it.
RESULTANT, know that a preponderance of evidence leads in the direction of Islamic jihad – “offended” or not – and fire jihad was chosen as their most effective weapon to bring down Notre Dame!
Some French politicians have attributed the church desecrations — averaging more than two a day — to “militant secularism.”
But in virtually every attack across Europe, writes Raymond Ibrahim for the Gatestone Institute, “authorities and media obfuscate the identity of the vandals.”
“In those rare instances when the Muslim (or “migrant”) identity of the destroyers is leaked, the desecraters are then presented as suffering from mental health issues,” he writes.
Ibrahim cited an analysis by the German website PI News that observed: “Hardly anyone writes and speaks about the increasing attacks on Christian symbols. There is an eloquent silence in both France and Germany about the scandal of the desecrations and the origin of the perpetrators.”
MOVING right along….
TO wit, in light of the disinfectants cited above, let’s just state the obvious: a preponderance of evidence leads straight back to here – guaranteed, jihadists burned down Notre Dame!! Mind you, the fact that one Islamic hydra or the other is not taking “direct credit” for the western catastrophe is neither here nor there. This is so because of another little known truth: sometimes they take “credit”, sometimes they don’t. It just depends. Think about it like this: certain times it serves their interests to send “messages”, but without staking claim. And being that a full-on admission could very well tip the scales against them – for the first time in, well, forever – isn’t “lying low” the best strategic option, just as long as western civilization burns to the ground? Of course.
BY the way, non-Muslim Americans are hardly out of the woods, so to speak. In fact, this past Palm Sunday, April 11 2019, Islamists vandalized a historic church in South Carolina, and it was hardly their first attack on an American Church – aside from all the attacks on synagogues and Jewish sites over the years.
A South Carolina church had three of its 125-year-old windows broken and was vandalized with Islamic-themed graffiti Sunday hours after celebrating Palm Sunday.
AGAIN, clear and convincing evidence of Islamic supremacism!
INDEED, coupled with the more than “coincidental” linkages within, internalize this too: symbolism IS key and core within Islamic culture, thus, Palm Sunday was their targeted day.
CONCLUSIVELY, how much more symbolic can it be that Notre Dame burned down during Holy Week; that it was the one month anniversary of the New Zealand mosque shooting, and, as it became engulfed, Muslims (all over the world) screamed: Allah Akbar, God/Allah is greater!!
BUT there’s more…..
A former chief architect and general inspector of French historical monuments has cast doubts on the official narrative that the Notre Dame fire was likely an electrical short that set the iconic cathedral ablaze.
Benjamin Mouton, who served as Chief Architect of Historic Monuments in France and oversaw restoration work of Notre Dame until 2013, says that it is highly unlikely an electrical short circuit took place, and that it would take an extraordinary effort to ignite the ancient oak of the cathedral.
“So, you’re telling us that this type of timber doesn’t burn like that?” Mouton was asked by an LCI host.“Oak that is 800-years-old is very hard – try to burn it,” Mouton said. “Old oak, it is not easy at all. You would need a lot of kindling to succeed… It stupefies me.”Asked to present an explanation for how the blaze spread so quickly and with such strength, Mouton asserted that there were no additional precautions that could have been taken to ensure such a “quick” incineration could be prevented.
“In the Nineties, we updated all the electrical wiring of Notre Dame,” Mouton said. “So there is no possibility of a short circuit. We updated to conform with the contemporary norms, even going very far – all the detection and protection systems against fire in the cathedral.”
Mouton also revealed that there are two watchmen on duty around the clock who monitor for any chance of fire, adding that the technical and security measures taken to protect monuments like Notre Dame are unprecedented.
More than a billion euros have been pledged to restore Notre Dame, which President Emmanuel Macron claims will be executed within five years.
THAT’s a wrap, for now. But don’t forget to listen to Lou Dobbs and his warning of a cover-up – a stand-out truth-teller who refuses to go with the herd, even at the now “silent” FOX News!
Cavuto Hangs Up on Catholic Leader Suggesting Notre Dame Fire May Be Tied to Paris Church Attacks: ‘No, Sir, We’re Not Doing That Here…’
REPORTEDLY, on Monday Catholic League President Bill Donohue went on with Neil Cavuto to discuss the inferno at Notre Dame Cathedral. During their discussion Donohue brought up the recent vandalism on several French Catholic churches.
Catholic League President Bill Donahue was on with Neil Cavuto.
“Forgive me for being suspicious. Just last month a 17th century church was set on fire in Paris,” Donohue said, reciting the recent attacks on churches. “We’ve seen tabernacles knocked down, crosses have been torn down. Statues have been smashed.”
Cavuto interrupted, saying, “We don’t know that.”
Neil Cavuto hung up on him.
“Forgive me for being suspicious. Just last month a 17th century church was set on fire in Paris,” Donohue said, reciting the recent attacks on churches. “We’ve seen tabernacles knocked down, crosses have been torn down. Statues have been smashed.”
Cavuto interrupted, saying, “We don’t know that.”
Neil Cavuto hung up on him.
Wojciech Pawelczyk@PolishPatriotTM
Neil Cavuto Hangs Up on Catholic League’s Bill Donohue During Interview About Notre Dame
“Just last month, a 17th-century church was set on fire in Paris. We’ve seen tabernacles knocked down, crosses have been2:39 PM – Apr 16, 2019 torn down, statues” – Donohue stated
HOT on Cavuto’s heels, Shep Smith, another gutless FOX anchor, chimed in and reacted on cue:
Shepherd Smith on Monday was interviewing French official Philippe Karsenty, who said the cathedral had been there for 850 years and “even the Nazis didn’t dare to destroy it.”
“You need to know for the last year we’ve had churches desecrated,” Karsenty said. “Of course you will hear the story of the politically correct which will tell you it is probably an accident.”
At which point Smith cut him off with, “Not on my watch.”
However, police reported that in just one week in March, a dozen Catholic churches in France were vandalized, including by fire…..
AS always, denial is a river.
INDEED, after Judge Jeanine Pirro “dared” to point out the obvious re hijabi-wearing Islamist Rep Omar, guess what happened? FOX suspended, humiliated, and, effectively, muzzled Pirro (by extension, others alike) from ever touching upon Islamic truth-telling!
NATURALLY, the fact that FOX’s Muslim Producer, Hufsa Kamal Khan, was “offended”, and Neil Cavuto, Shep Smith, as well as Brett Baier flanked her (for political gain, but that’s for another airing), well, what else is there to say?
SO, once again, alternative media is consigned to execute the heavy-lifting – the role which should be played by the heretofore “third estate”, but no matter. Regardless, let’s get on with it.
RESULTANT, know that a preponderance of evidence leads in the direction of Islamic jihad – “offended” or not – and fire jihad was chosen as their most effective weapon to bring down Notre Dame!
CONSIDER THE TRAILS:
-
1 – Prosecutors have charged three women (in Sept. 2016) suspected of plotting to blow up a car packed with gas canisters near Notre Dame cathedral in Paris with terrorism offences.
Key points:
- Two of the women face charges of plotting to kill public officials
- Police say the women planned attacks on train stations in Paris
- Two of the women have known links to Islamist radicals Police say the women are also suspected of planning to strike a train station in the Paris area or to target police.Those charged with involvement in a terrorist conspiracy were named as Ines Madani, 19, Sarah Hervouet, 23, and Amel Sakaou, 39.They were brought before anti-terrorism judges on Monday and remanded in custody.
In a statement, prosecutors said Madani and Hervouet were
also charged with plotting to kill public officials, while Hervouet’s
boyfriend was charged with failing to report a terrorist offence.
The women are believed by police to have been inspired by repeated calls by the Islamic State (IS) group for attacks in France.
A known French IS recruiter is also believed to be linked to the case.
France is on heightened alert after two attacks in July, one in the southern resort of Nice, where a truck driver crushed 86 people to death, and another in Normandy, where two men murdered an elderly priest.
The country has been repeatedly targeted by Islamic extremists in the past two years. An assault on the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine in early 2015 was followed by a series of coordinated shooting attacks that killed 130 people in Paris in November.
On Sunday, Prime Minister Manuel Valls said the terror threat was at a “maximum” and that authorities were preventing attacks and smashing jihadist networks “every day”.
“This week, at least two attacks were foiled,” he said.
Mr Valls said authorities considered as many as 15,000 people as radicals who posed a potential threat.
“There will be new attacks, there will be innocent victims … this is also my role to tell this truth to the French people,” Mr Valls said.
Sources close to the investigation said the women had discussed obtaining suicide belts or ramming cars filled with explosives into buildings.
One of them was found with a letter promising her allegiance to IS, the group behind the Paris attacks last November.
A 15-year-old boy arrested in eastern Paris at the weekend was also brought before investigating magistrates and charged with conspiring to commit attacks.
AFP sources said the youth had written to contacts on Telegram — an encrypted messaging app widely used by jihadists to communicate — of his plans to carry out a knife attack.
The women were arrested after police were alerted to a Peugeot car parked near the Notre Dame cathedral in the middle of one of Paris’s busiest tourist spots on September 4.
It was found to contain five gas cylinders, three bottles of diesel and a half-smoked cigarette inside.
Women linked to Islamist radicals:
A fourth woman, Ornella Gilligmann, was also charged with terrorist offences over the find.
She told police she and Madani tried to set the vehicle alight but fled when they saw a man they believed to be a police officer approach.
Investigators moved quickly to arrest her suspected accomplices, believing them to be on the cusp of staging an attack.
During their arrest in the southern Paris suburb of Essonne, Hervouet stabbed a policeman, injuring him in the shoulder.
Madani was shot in the leg after she also charged at an officer with a knife.
Both were known to police for their links to Islamist radicals.
- 2 – Dear reader, how many believe in such fiery coincidences, or, for that matter, the tooth fairy?? Bulls-eye. Not only that, the simple fact that round-the-clock guards were hide nor hair, and that construction workers were not on-site at the time of the fire’s breakout, well……Reportedly, crews inspected the site every two to three hours, so it was “fortuitous” that “some people” had time to do this or that – with or without the enabling of one or another of the construction crew. Hmm.
- 3 – Trust, Islamist Rep Omar (Tlaib alike) views the engulfed catastrophe thusly: looks like “some flames did something”, so what’s all the fuss about? After all, according to Islamic supremacist teachings – though she conceded that it was a worldwide cultural site – she couldn’t bring herself to go any further, that is, that it represented the ultimate destruction of an iconic landmark of western civilization and Christendom for 850 years, or some such truthful verbiage. Think about that. Besides, how many understand what said denial and omission really means? How many realize that she is hardly alone in her supremacist worldview, that she stands alongside a large segment of Mohammedans, even though a portion remain silent as to the same?
- 4 – Most ominously and tellingly, churches throughout Europe and within Islamic dominated regions are continuously burning – as a “veil of silence” exists between western politicians and media mouthpieces, in a symbiotic alliance to bring down the west. Hence, over the years, it has become this site’s due diligence to expose and fully identify fire jihad as a fatwa-sanctioned weapon.
Some French politicians have attributed the church desecrations — averaging more than two a day — to “militant secularism.”
But in virtually every attack across Europe, writes Raymond Ibrahim for the Gatestone Institute, “authorities and media obfuscate the identity of the vandals.”
“In those rare instances when the Muslim (or “migrant”) identity of the destroyers is leaked, the desecraters are then presented as suffering from mental health issues,” he writes.
Ibrahim cited an analysis by the German website PI News that observed: “Hardly anyone writes and speaks about the increasing attacks on Christian symbols. There is an eloquent silence in both France and Germany about the scandal of the desecrations and the origin of the perpetrators.”
MOVING right along….
Jihadists linked to ISIS have shared a menacing image of Notre Dame in flames once more, warning: ‘Wait for the next’.
- 5 – The extremist media group published the graphic showing flames in front of the Paris cathedral’s bell towers, which survived Monday’s blaze.
There is no indication
that the fire was linked to terror but ISIS fanatics have
reveled in the damage to the 850-year-old landmark, a symbol of Western
civilization, just days before Easter.
The latest image, revealed
by terror monitors SITE intelligence, hints at a possible
deliberate attack by ISIS-aligned militants in the future.
TO wit, in light of the disinfectants cited above, let’s just state the obvious: a preponderance of evidence leads straight back to here – guaranteed, jihadists burned down Notre Dame!! Mind you, the fact that one Islamic hydra or the other is not taking “direct credit” for the western catastrophe is neither here nor there. This is so because of another little known truth: sometimes they take “credit”, sometimes they don’t. It just depends. Think about it like this: certain times it serves their interests to send “messages”, but without staking claim. And being that a full-on admission could very well tip the scales against them – for the first time in, well, forever – isn’t “lying low” the best strategic option, just as long as western civilization burns to the ground? Of course.
BY the way, non-Muslim Americans are hardly out of the woods, so to speak. In fact, this past Palm Sunday, April 11 2019, Islamists vandalized a historic church in South Carolina, and it was hardly their first attack on an American Church – aside from all the attacks on synagogues and Jewish sites over the years.
A South Carolina church had three of its 125-year-old windows broken and was vandalized with Islamic-themed graffiti Sunday hours after celebrating Palm Sunday.
“Submit to God thru Islam” and “Muhammed is his prophet” were spray-painted on the outside of Midway Presbyterian Church, according to local police.
INDEED, coupled with the more than “coincidental” linkages within, internalize this too: symbolism IS key and core within Islamic culture, thus, Palm Sunday was their targeted day.
CONCLUSIVELY, how much more symbolic can it be that Notre Dame burned down during Holy Week; that it was the one month anniversary of the New Zealand mosque shooting, and, as it became engulfed, Muslims (all over the world) screamed: Allah Akbar, God/Allah is greater!!
BUT there’s more…..
A former chief architect and general inspector of French historical monuments has cast doubts on the official narrative that the Notre Dame fire was likely an electrical short that set the iconic cathedral ablaze.
Benjamin Mouton, who served as Chief Architect of Historic Monuments in France and oversaw restoration work of Notre Dame until 2013, says that it is highly unlikely an electrical short circuit took place, and that it would take an extraordinary effort to ignite the ancient oak of the cathedral.
“So, you’re telling us that this type of timber doesn’t burn like that?” Mouton was asked by an LCI host.“Oak that is 800-years-old is very hard – try to burn it,” Mouton said. “Old oak, it is not easy at all. You would need a lot of kindling to succeed… It stupefies me.”Asked to present an explanation for how the blaze spread so quickly and with such strength, Mouton asserted that there were no additional precautions that could have been taken to ensure such a “quick” incineration could be prevented.
“In the Nineties, we updated all the electrical wiring of Notre Dame,” Mouton said. “So there is no possibility of a short circuit. We updated to conform with the contemporary norms, even going very far – all the detection and protection systems against fire in the cathedral.”
Mouton also revealed that there are two watchmen on duty around the clock who monitor for any chance of fire, adding that the technical and security measures taken to protect monuments like Notre Dame are unprecedented.
More than a billion euros have been pledged to restore Notre Dame, which President Emmanuel Macron claims will be executed within five years.
THAT’s a wrap, for now. But don’t forget to listen to Lou Dobbs and his warning of a cover-up – a stand-out truth-teller who refuses to go with the herd, even at the now “silent” FOX News!
- {This poster created by the
Al-Muntasir media group – an ISIS affiliated propaganda wing – appeared
online on Monday night, a recreation from the thwarted attack in 2016!}
{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:
MESSAGE FAILED:
- This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
- If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}
No comments:
Post a Comment