
"I think it is a mistake to keep articulating support for the proposition that unlawful enemy combatants should be tried in civilian courts, which I think are ill suited to the task and which present considerable security risks for us and opportunities for terrorists and those allied with them." 
Do you have an immediate Media Request? If so, please contact our Director of Operations at: Nancy@FamilySecurityMatters.org (202) 528 - 4665

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Ruth S. King is a freelance writer who writes a monthly column in OUTPOST, the publication of Americans for a Safe Israel.
|
| "I think the handling of the New Black Panther Party case is something that seems deeply disturbing, and warrants either a full explanation, or a serious outside inquiry, possibly from Congress, or both. Two members of the New Black Panther party were seen intimidating voters outside a poll in Philadelphia during the 2008 election, and a case against them resulted in a decision for the government, which the defendants did not contest. A witness to the intimidation who had served as a highly civil rights lawyer at the Justice Department in the 1960's, Bartle Bull, said that the defendants' conduct was the most blatant kind of intimidation he had ever seen, including what he witnessed in Mississippi in the 1960's"READ ENTIRE ARTICLE - CLICK HERE |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment