|
|
|
Join UANI
Top
Stories
Guardian: "Iranian authorities have
arrested a Canadian-Iranian professor of social anthropology, the
latest in a string of cases involving dual nationals which has prompted
concern over the country's political atmosphere. Homa Hoodfar was arrested
earlier this week after nearly three months of repeated questioning by
the Iranian intelligence service, her sister told the Guardian on
Wednesday. Hoodfar is the latest in the ever-expanding list of dual
nationals targeted in recent months. Several Iranian dual nationals
from the US, the UK, Canada and France are currently behind bars or
facing regular questioning, often accused of espionage or collaborating
with a hostile government. The 65-year-old scholar travelled to her
home country in February, principally for personal reasons, but she
also continued her academic research while in the country, her family
said. Her trip coincided with parliamentary elections during which a
record number of women were elected as MPs, mostly allied with the moderate
administration of Hassan Rouhani. In March, members of Iran's powerful
Revolutionary Guards raided Hoodfar's flat a day before she was due to
fly to London, where she planned to join her family for the Persian new
year and the 70th birthday of her brother. The authorities confiscated
her belongings and her three passports, and summoned Hoodfar for
regular questioning. Hoodfar's family had chosen not to go public until
now because they believed the interrogations were the result of a
misunderstanding and would soon end, according to her sister, Katayoon
Hoodfar." http://t.uani.com/24CB7ZP
AFP: "Iran's economy faces tough
years ahead despite a nuclear deal with world powers that the
government hoped would spur investment and revive stagnant growth,
ministers have warned. Speaking to members of parliament on Monday and
Tuesday, the industry and interior ministers painted a bleak picture of
chronic underinvestment, surging inflation and unemployment in the
Islamic republic. Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli warned on
Monday that the country may achieve growth of only between 1.5 and
three percent per annum. 'With that sort of growth, unemployment and
inflation will double in the short term. We need foreign investment,'
he said. His predictions fall far short of the growth target of eight
percent President Hassan Rouhani set in January to tackle double-figure
inflation and high unemployment... Rahmani Fazli said a total of 3.5
million Iranians -- some 11 percent of the workforce -- are unemployed.
'I myself have three unemployed university graduates at home,' he said.
New investment cannot come soon enough for some sectors. 'Gradually
increasing in the industrial and mining sector between 2000 and 2011,
investment has fallen since 2012,' Industry Minister Mohammad Reza
Nematzadeh told parliament on Tuesday. The lack of investment had
created 'a catastrophe in the industrial sector', he said." http://t.uani.com/1thkBTE
The
Hill: "The
State Department is backing off from its decision to close the book on
an investigation into an edited video of a 2013 press briefing. Despite
claiming last week that the department would not continue to dig to
find out who deleted the roughly eight minutes of videotape from a
YouTube archive of the briefing, it has reversed course following an
order from Secretary John Kerry. 'We're going to continue to look at
additional troves of information in an effort to find out, again, what
happened,' spokesman Mark Toner told reporters on Wednesday. 'That is
basically because the secretary said he wants to dive deeper into this,
look more into what happened, and try to get to the bottom of what
happened. 'And so, what our office of legal adviser did was go back and
look at what are other areas where there could be information.'
Criticism has mounted on the State Department following the revelation early
this month that someone within the public affairs office had ordered
portions of the video be deleted. The missing video snippet - which has
since been restored - featured a discussion between then-spokeswoman
Jen Psaki and a Fox News reporter about nuclear negotiations with Iran,
and whether it would be appropriate for the government to lie in order
to advance diplomacy. So far, the department has been unable to
determine who ordered the edit." http://t.uani.com/1PLorye
Business
Risk
WSJ: "Presumptive Republican White
House nominee Donald Trump would consult with Congress and federal
agencies on a number of his signature foreign policy initiatives,
including reworking a nuclear deal with Iran and a proposed ban on the
entry of Muslims into the U.S., a top adviser said Wednesday. Walid
Phares, one of Mr. Trump's senior foreign policy advisers, said the
candidate would seek domestic and international 'consensus' on a range
of foreign policy initiatives... Mr. Trump has called a recent nuclear deal
with Iran 'terrible' and 'horrible' but Mr. Phares said Mr. Trump
wouldn't immediately attempt to negate it once in office. 'He is going
to be revising, reviewing, and maybe trying to modify the Iran deal,'
Mr. Phares said. One option, he said, would be to resubmit the deal -
or something like it - to Congress for a vote, a process whose outcome
would depend on the makeup of Congress next year. Many bankers are
watching the U.S. election closely and waiting for a clearer
understanding of future U.S. policy towards Iran before doing business
with the country. Mr. Phares's suggestion Mr. Trump would revise the
agreement instead of completely voiding it could influence the way some
financial institutions deal with companies in Iran seeking access to
global markets." http://t.uani.com/1Upvmcn
Sanctions
Relief
Reuters: "South Korea, Asia's largest
buyer of condensate, will step up purchases of the ultra light oil from
Iran by more than 50 percent in June, two sources said, as competitive
pricing squeezes out rival oil from Qatar. While South Korea does not
provide separate data on imports of condensate, traders said the
expected June shipments from Iran of at least six million barrels, or
200,000 barrels a day, would be a record level. Iranian condensate
imports could gain further momentum in the fourth quarter, if Iran
clinches a deal with Hyundai Chemical to supply the company's new
splitter. Talks between Hyundai Chemical and the National Iranian Oil
Company (NIOC) on a term supply deal are under way, a third source
familiar with the matter said. South Korea, the world's fifth-largest
crude buyer, has more than doubled its oil imports from Iran in the
first four months of this year to about 248,000 barrrels a day after
Western sanctions on Iran were removed in January... Two South Korean
buyers, refiners SK Energy and Hanwha Total Petrochemical Co, are set
to lift at least six million barrels of Iranian South Pars condensate
in June, up from about 3-4 million barrels in April and May, two
sources with knowledge of the matter said. A Hanwha spokesman said the
refiner planned to import about 2 million barrels of Iranian condensate
in June, as it was cheaper than oil from Qatar and the company wanted
to diversify its sources of supply." http://t.uani.com/1sxeiuI
Reuters: "Iran expects a row with
Germany over unpaid state export guarantees to be resolved soon, its
industry minister was quoted as saying in a German newspaper on
Thursday, a step which would remove a big hurdle to reviving trade
relations. Iran owes Germany about 500 million euros ($570 million)
under so-called Hermes covers, a German government arrangement that
protects German companies if foreign debtors fail to pay. Mohammad Reza
Nematzadeh told Germany's Handelsblatt newspaper in an interview that
there were only a few small problems left to be resolved. 'After my
meeting with Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel it looks like the last
problems will be able to be solved quickly,' Nematzadeh said. He added
that he expected that Gabriel, who was forced to cancel a trip to Iran
last month due to illness, would now head to Tehran in October. 'By
then we hope that all remaining problems will be solved,' he said. A
spokesman for Germany's economy ministry said that talks with Iran were
still ongoing, but Berlin was optimistic that the government could soon
offer fresh state export guarantees to companies that plan to do
business with Iran... Nematzadeh said big German firms including
Volkswagen, Daimler, Siemens, Linde, BASF and Airbus, were already in
negotiations about doing business in Iran." http://t.uani.com/1tcSswq
Press
TV (Iran):
"The Islamic Republic of Iran and Germany's Aurubis AG are set to
look into ways of cooperating in the area of copper industry. Mehdi
Karbassian, director of Iran's Mines and Mining Industries Development
and Renovation (IMIDRO), a major state-owned holding company active in
the mining sector, has announced a plan by a team of Germany's Aurubis
AG to visit Iran for economic cooperation in the near future. The
official pointed to his recent trip to Germany and his visit to Aurubis
HQ in Hamburg, where he said German company officials pointed to their
readiness to cooperate with Iran and invest in its copper industry,
Tasnim news agency reported. Karbassian said Aurubis, which is the
largest copper producer in Europe and the biggest copper recycler in
the world, declared its intention to send a team to Tehran in the near
future when the two sides will discuss cooperation further." http://t.uani.com/1PIa9yr
Domestic
Politics
Tehran
Times: "The
World Bank cut its forecast of Iran's gross domestic product (GDP)
growth for 2016 to 4.4 percent, the organization said in an update to
its January 2016 Global Economic Prospects report. In the January
report, the World Bank had forecasted Iran's GDP will grow by 5.8
percent in 2016 and by 6.7 percent in 2017. The report said Iran's
economy expanded by 1.9 percent in 2015." http://t.uani.com/1tcWIvR
Opinion
& Analysis
UANI
Chairman Senator Joseph I. Lieberman & UANI CEO Ambassador Mark D.
Wallace in AIPAC:
"There is a dangerous misconception, perpetuated largely by
Iranian interests, that the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action (JCPOA) signals that Iran is now open for business. But
in reality, the nuclear agreement was very narrowly focused on one issue.
It was transactional, not transformational. Today, Iran remains the
world's leading state sponsor of terrorism and its abysmal record and
behavior on so many important issues demonstrates that it should never
get the benefit of the doubt, let alone the benefit of the world's
business. Since the nuclear accord went into effect, Iranian Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Hassan Rouhani, Foreign
Minister Javad Zarif, and many other regime officials have complained
bitterly that the West-namely the United States-should be doing more to
ensure the speedy flow of foreign investment into Tehran's troublesome
economy. On May 31, Foreign Minister Zarif dubbed the reluctance to
engage with Iran by some of the powerhouses of the global financial system-including
Deutsche Bank, Société Générale, and HSBC-a 'psychological barrier' to
doing business with Iran that the United States has a special
responsibility to remedy. But the political class in the Islamic
Republic has no one to blame but themselves for the risks inherent in
investing in the Ayatollah. United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) has
written to hundreds of banks, corporations, institutional investors,
and related entities, warning them of the multiple and specific risks
associated with Iran. Those risks include: banking risk; unavailability
or deficiency of insurance coverage; enforcement and imposition of
sanctions independent of the JCPOA; unwittingly doing business with the
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC); and impairment of corporate
reputation and future business opportunities outside Iran... Finally, a
company that shortsightedly embraces business opportunities in Iran
will likely be cut off from more lucrative opportunities in countries
that oppose its hegemonic policies. The choices can be stark. Invest in
the economies of, for instance, the United States, Britain, France,
Germany, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, the
other Arab Gulf countries and even Israel with a combined GDP of over
$32 trillion, or take a gamble on Iran's economy with a GDP of under
$400 billion. There is a real risk that companies investing in Iran
will lose market share or will be banned entirely from some of these
markets. In the end, betting on Tehran for the sake of short-term financial
gain is not worth the long-term peril-for companies, their investors,
and their reputations. It's a no-brainer." http://t.uani.com/1UihaWz
Eli
Lake in Bloomberg:
"One of the unexpected results of President Barack Obama's new
opening to Iran is that U.S. taxpayers are now funding both sides of
the Middle East's arms race. The U.S. is deliberately subsidizing
defense spending for allies like Egypt and Israel. Now the U.S. is
inadvertently paying for some of Iran's military expenditures as well.
It all starts with $1.7 billion the U.S. Treasury wired to Iran's
Central Bank in January, during a delicate prisoner swap and the
implementation of last summer's nuclear deal to resolve a long-standing
dispute about Iran's arms purchases before the revolution of 1979. For
months it was unclear what Iran's government would do with this money.
But last month the mystery was solved when Iran's Guardian Council
approved the government's 2017 budget that instructed Iran's Central
Bank to transfer the $1.7 billion to the military. Saeed Ghasseminejad,
an associate fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies,
spotted the budget item. He told me the development was widely reported
in Iran by numerous sources including the state-funded news services.
'Article 22 of the budget for 2017 says the Central Bank is required to
give the money from the legal settlement of Iran's pre- and
post-revolutionary arms sales of up to $1.7 billion to the defense
budget,' he said. Republicans and some Democrats who opposed Obama's
nuclear deal have argued that the end of some sanctions would help to
fund Iran's military. But at least that was Iran's money already
(albeit frozen in overseas bank accounts). The $1.7 billion that
Treasury transferred to Iran in January is different. A portion of it,
$400 million, came from a trust fund comprising money paid by the
government of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a U.S. ally, for arms sold to
Iran before the 1979 revolution. Those sales were cut off in 1979 after
revolutionaries took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held the
American staff hostage for 444 days. The remaining $1.3 billion
represents interest on the $400 million principle over more than 36
years... The irony here is that Iran has been pleading poverty in
recent months. The country's supreme leader and foreign minister have
publicly complained that Iran's economy has not seen the benefits
expected from the Iran nuclear deal. And yet Iran's 2017 $19 billion
defense budget has increased by 90 percent from 2016, according to
Ghasseminejad. We now know where $1.7 billion of that came from." http://t.uani.com/1Xc2Jpd
Gary
Kleiman in IntelliNews: "Since the January implementation of the nuclear
deal that enabled the partial lifting of sanctions, Iranian officials
from the supreme leader to the central bank governor have lambasted
foreign banks for their so-called 'Iranophobia', mainly due to the US
dollar and financial system curbs that remain in effect. These
restrictions, directed particularly at the Revolutionary Guard with its
pervasive economic control, are enshrined in domestic US legislation
due to expire at year-end and have subjected major Asian and European
banks to billions of dollars in penalties. However, Tehran's political
leaders and technocrats, joined most recently by the International
Monetary Fund's (IMF) deputy director on a maiden visit to the country,
also acknowledge the pressing need for a clean-up of the
state-dominated banking sector. The Iranian banking system's reported
non-performing loan ratio stands at 15%, and businesses are starved for
credit at mandatory near 20% 'return' rates under the no-interest
Islamic framework. President Hassan Rouhani's advisers and local
experts also emphasize the further development of the debt and equity
markets, which contribute only marginally to savings mobilization and
company financing, and have yet to attract much in the way of foreign
investment, which is only 1% of the activity on the Tehran Stock
Exchange. The lack of progress on a comprehensive financial sector
reform agenda cannot be blamed on Washington or disappointing nuclear
deal implementation, and Iranian policymakers and the just-elected
parliament must reverse this state of affairs if they are to eventually
earn global banking confidence. The IMF's number two, David Lipton,
praised Iran's economic stabilization strides during his brief visit in
May, but cited a long list of unfinished fiscal, monetary and
structural adjustments already taken by rival frontier markets...
Without serious internal accountability taking the place of external
scapegoating, fears over a financial system meltdown and foreign
investor fright will intensify over the next sanctions deal
phase." http://t.uani.com/1Upx9Ox
Peter
Huessy in Defense News: "Every day, two-thirds of all oil consumed
world-wide passes through seven ocean choke points. The most vital of
these, the Strait of Hormuz, is the gateway to the Persian Gulf's oil
shipment ports, and is bordered by Iran, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates.
General Hossein Salami, deputy commander of Iran's powerful
Revolutionary Guard, recently said Iranian forces will close the Strait
of Hormuz if the United States 'threatens' Iran. In the past, similar
threats by Iran have largely been dismissed. Why? Because America and
its allies believe the presence of a strong U.S. navy in the region
makes such threats empty. But should the threat now be taken seriously?
Unfortunately, the U.S. Navy's ability to keep the Strait open is
weaker than in the recent past, and Iranian military capabilities are
measurably stronger. It is not as if we had no warning of the problem.
In a Pentagon wargame in 2002 to test U.S. ability to keep the Strait
open, the U.S. Navy failed spectacularly. A carrier and ten cruisers were
'sunk' as a retired U.S. Marine general carried the day for the Red
Team, simulating Iranian unconventional tactics to great effect... Five
years ago, Admiral Habibollah Sayari, then the Iranian navy commander,
said closing the strait was 'as easy as drinking a glass of water.' At
that time, most military analysts were unimpressed. Max Boot and
Bradley Russell with the Council on Foreign Relations, shrugged off the
threat, retorting, 'Actually it would be about as easy as drinking an
entire bucket of water in one gulp.' They added that 'Iran tried this
trick before and failed miserably,' referring to April 18, 1988, when
President Reagan ordered the U.S. Navy to end Iranian naval harassment
in the Gulf. Operation Praying Mantis was launched, the Navy's biggest
surface combat action since World War II, and Iranian attacks on
Persian Gulf shipping ceased. Fast forward to 2016. Could Iran now
successfully close the Strait of Hormuz? New factors suggest the answer
to that question is 'Yes.' ... Would U.S. support of a regional Arab
coalition be able to counter these Iranian objectives? Yes, but only if
we implement a cooperative regional strategy that includes bolstering
U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy conventional capabilities, battle planning
with our allies to keep the straits open, deploying additional missile
defense systems, adopting a regional counter-Iran strategy, and
executing an Iranian denuclearization plan that jettisons the failed
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). JCPOA, the Iranian 'nuclear
deal,' is seen by many as a way for the United States to assist Iran's
push for regional power. As Dennis Ross writes: 'Iranian regional
hegemony, especially as Iran's behavior in the Gulf has been more
aggressive, not less so, with regular Iranian forces joining the
Revolutionary Guard now deployed to Syria, wider use of Shiite
militias, arms smuggling into Bahrain and the eastern province of Saudi
Arabia, and ballistic missile tests.' Without America as a partner, our
Gulf allies cannot stand up to growing Iranian terrorism that is
bolstered by $150 billion provided by JCPOA, funds equivalent to at
least 50 times more per capita than what the U.S. provided 17 European
nations under the Marshall Plan at the end of World War II." http://t.uani.com/25NJHdU
|
|
Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com
United Against Nuclear
Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in
a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a
regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an
issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own
interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of
nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment