Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Eye on Iran: U.S. Transferred $1.3 Billion More in Cash to Iran After Initial Payment


   EYE ON IRAN
Facebook
Twitter
View our videos on YouTube
   




TOP STORIES 


The Obama administration followed up a planeload of $400 million in cash sent to Iran in January with two more such shipments in the next 19 days, totaling another $1.3 billion, according to congressional officials briefed by the U.S. State, Treasury and Justice departments. The cash payments-made in Swiss francs, euros and other currencies-settled a decades-old dispute over a failed arms deal dating back to 1979. U.S. officials have acknowledged the payment of the first $400 million coincided with Iran's release of American prisoners and was used as leverage to ensure they were flown out of Tehran's Mehrabad on the morning of Jan. 17... The Obama administration previously had refused to disclose the mechanics of the $1.7 billion settlement, despite repeated calls from U.S. lawmakers. The State Department announced the settlement on Jan. 17 but didn't brief Congress that the entire amount had been paid in cash. U.S. lawmakers have voiced concern that Iran's military units, particularly the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, would use the cash to finance military allies in the Middle East, including the Assad regime in Syria, Houthi militias in Yemen, and the Lebanese militia, Hezbollah.


A U.S. Navy coastal patrol ship changed course after a fast-attack craft from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps came within 100 yards (91 meters) of it in the central Gulf on Sunday, U.S. Defense Department officials said on Tuesday. It was at least the fourth such incident in less than a month. U.S. officials are concerned that these actions by Iran could lead to mistakes... there have been 31 similar interactions with Iranian ships this year, almost double the amount from the same period last year. "We don't see this type of unsafe and unprofessional activity from any other nation," the defense official added.


With Iran's oil production closing in on pre-sanctions levels, the world's biggest crude suppliers may face a lower hurdle to an agreement on freezing output to revive prices. The Persian Gulf nation is pumping 3.8 million barrels a day, approaching its daily target of 4 million barrels, Mohsen Ghamsari, director for international affairs at the National Iranian Oil Co., said Wednesday at a conference in Singapore. He said earlier in the week that Iran could reach its target in two to three months.

CONGRESSIONAL ACTION


Senate Republicans are taking aim at the Obama administration's settlement of an arms dispute with Iran, which GOP lawmakers believe was a ransom, amid lingering backlash over the agreement. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is introducing legislation Tuesday to force Iran to return the money and pay American victims of Iran-backed terrorism. The Treasury Department would be blocked from making payments to Iran out of its Judgement Fund until Tehran complies with the bill... The Florida Republican's legislation is backed by GOP Sens. John Cornyn (Texas), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), John Barrasso (Wyo.) and Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.). Rubio, Kirk and Ayotte are in the midst of heated reelection battles.  Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) is introducing the bill in the House that is expected to consider Iran legislation this month.


House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce introduced a bill Tuesday that "makes clear" President Obama violated U.S. policy by paying $400 million in cash in exchange for four U.S. citizens held in Iran. The legislation would also "ban cash payments to Iran - period," and would require "transparency on future settlements" to ensure they are not used to pay ransom.

BUSINESS RISK

[The Supreme] Leader's adviser has told reporters joining Financial Action Task Force (FATF) would restrict activities of some of Revolutionary bodies... [and] that it was not expedient for the country to join the Task Force and any decision to join it should be postponed.


A senior Iranian lawmaker warned that an agreement between the Islamic Republic and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the policy-making body of the international financial system, threatens the country's national security. Speaking to the Tasnim News Agency, Mohammad Javad Jamali, a member of the presiding board of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, expressed concerns that the deal between Iran and the FATF could endanger the country's national interests. He said the Westerners are seeking to further interfere in the internal affairs of the Islamic Republic through the agreement. They are trying to secretly monitor Iran's banking system and financial exchanges with other countries, he added. "... If the deal is implemented, the security of the Islamic establishment will be threatened," the MP said.

SANCTIONS RELIEF

German company SOLARWATT GmbH, one of the pioneers of the solar industry, has plans to start projects in Iran by constructing a 30 megawatt solar power plant... Abolfazl Mousavi Fazel, representative of SOLARWATT, said the company is applying for permission to build the plant as part of the German government's plans for the promotion of solar industry in Iran.


The Taiwan-based payment company Castles, specializing  in payment tools, has started a semi knocked-down production line in Iran's Arvand Free Trade Zone, in cooperation with Bank Pasargad's subsidiary, FANAP. FANAP is launching the POS terminal production line in Khorramshahr Free trade Zone, Khuzestan Province. Jason Chiang, sales manager of Castles in the Middles East, said the high demand in Iranian market has prompted the company to expand its presence in the country. "The Iranian market offers many opportunities, especially now that sanctions are lifted and foreigners have more opportunities to take part in the market," he said. "Our Iranian partner, FANAP, is producing the POS terminal and we provide them with technical and technological assistance."

Italtel - a leading telecommunications company in Network Functions Virtualization, managed services and all-IP communication - today revealed its intentions in Iran, announcing it will concentrate on building up ultra-fast Internet wideband infrastructures so that essential services such as health and education can be improved. Iran is one of the fastest growing economies of the Middle East following the removal of the economic sanctions at the beginning of 2016. As a result, many international operators and technology vendors, including Italtel, are looking to take advantage of the growth and development opportunities. Speaking at the Iran Connect 2016 conference - which is taking place today and tomorrow at Tehran's Espinas Palace Hotel - Italtel's CEO Stefano Pileri said industries including health, transport and education would be the sectors which would reap the most benefit for operators and Iran citizens.

FOREIGN AFFAIRS


Head of French National Assembly Claude Bartolone yesterday reiterated the French desire to maintain relations with the Iranian Shura Council... Heading a parliamentary delegation, Bartolone said the nuclear deal reached last year contributed to the development of mutual relations. He also expressed his hope that Iran implement the terms of the deal... Bartolone's visit to Tehran is expected to last until Friday and he is scheduled to meet Iran's President Hassan Rouhani, Foreign Minister Mohamed Javad Zarif and the chairman of the Expediency Discernment Council of Iran.

SAUDI-IRAN TENSIONS


Saudi Arabia's top cleric is revving up the kingdom's rhetoric against Iran, saying in comments published on Tuesday that Tehran's leaders are "not Muslims," in response to rancorous remarks from Iran's supreme leader. The remarks by Grand Mufti Abdulaziz Al Sheikh came a day after Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Saudi authorities of killing Muslims injured during last year's crush of crowds at the hajj pilgrimage.

Head of the Strategic Research Center of Iran's Expediency Council Ali Akbar Velayati slammed Riyadh for its negligence to ensure the safety of Hajj pilgrims last year, saying that the deadly crush of people in Mina will pave the way for the collapse of the Al Saud ruling family. "The Al Saud regime has made some moves over the past years, which are very rare in the history of Islam," Velayati, who is also an international adviser to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, said...


Iran's president on Wednesday called on the Muslim world to "punish" Saudi Arabia following last year's hajj crush and stampede that killed over 2,400 people - sharp criticism as multitudes poured into the kingdom for this year's pilgrimage.

DOMESTIC POLITICS

With only eight months left of his current term, President Hassan Rouhani and his potential rivals are gearing up for Iran's May 2017 presidential election. Rouhani, who came to power in 2013 promising to resolve the nuclear issue, has fulfilled this key pledge with a comprehensive agreement with world powers. But is the nuclear deal enough to guarantee his victory in the upcoming elections? The most likely answer is "no," considering the challenges he faces in domestic politics, cultural issues and, most importantly, the economy... phrases such as "Rouhani hasn't been able to do anything either" or "the nuclear deal has had no effect on people's livelihoods" are quite common among the Iranian public these days.

OPINION & ANALYSIS

Last week we published a study on a set of exemptions to the limits of the Iran deal, or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which were made by the JCPOA Joint Commission prior to Implementation Day.  The report caused a whirlwind of media and expert attention.  Not surprisingly, the way many viewed these revelations was driven in large part by whether or not they supported the deal.  Given the nature of the report, the pro-deal faction was the most vocal against our findings and claimed the report exaggerated the findings and implications of the information.  The anti-deal faction used the information as further support for their belief that the deal is flawed.  However, though both sides in some cases disagreed with the framing, neither was able to refute our central claim that the exemptions were made and that Iran would not have been in compliance with the JCPOA on Implementation Day had the Joint Commission not reached decisions granting these exemptions.

Jay Solomon, one of America's top national security journalists, has covered Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Over the last few years, he has focused especially on Iran, its larger regional project, and U.S.-Iran relations, including the deal over the regime's nuclear program, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Solomon's stories about Iran continue to lead the news. His report last month showing how the Obama White House shipped $400 million to Iran on wooden pallets at the same time the clerical regime released U.S. hostages strongly suggested the administration paid ransom. His just-published first book "The Iran Wars: Spy Games, Bank Battles, and the Secret Deals that Reshaped the Middle East" is the fall season's top book on national security and has already hit a number of bestseller lists. Recently, I sat down with Solomon here in Washington, D.C. to talk about his book, Iran, the Obama administration, and the direction of American foreign policy.


Iran "has fully implemented its required commitments." That was the representation Obama secretary of state John Kerry made to the American people in announcing on January 16 - "Implementation Day" of President Obama's Iran nuclear deal (aka, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) - that international economic sanctions were consequently being lifted against Iran. Secretary Kerry added that "Iran has undertaken significant steps that many, and I do mean many, people doubted would ever come to pass." Still, Kerry promised, the Obama administration would continue watching the mullahs like a hawk, thus "assuring continued full compliance" with the regime's JCPOA commitments. The same day, President Obama signed an executive order lifting a number of U.S. economic sanctions against Iran. We now know he also set in motion a furtive $400 million cash transfer to the regime as a ransom (which the administration calls "leverage") for the release of four American hostages - the first installment of a carefully structured $1.7 billion side payment to Iran (ostensibly in settlement of a failed 1970s arms deal), details about which the administration continues to withhold from Congress and the public. All of this was based on this purported "full implementation" of Iran's "required commitments" under the JCPOA touted by Obama and Kerry. And all of it was a deliberate, audacious, elaborately plotted lie.


Washington, conventional wisdom has long held that Iran's presence south of the U.S. border constitutes little more than an axis of annoyance. In this telling, Iran's activities in Central and South America-from numerous commercial and trade deals with various nations to the establishment of cultural centers throughout the region-are disorganized, opportunistic, and ultimately of little consequence. That narrative has proved remarkably persistent, and-in part as a result-Washington has historically paid scant attention to Iran's presence in the hemisphere. But there is ample evidence to the contrary in the form of Iran's strategic cooperation with the region's anti-American regimes, and in well-documented instances of Iranian-sponsored subversion organized there and aimed at U.S. interests and allies. Now, with the Islamic Republic increasingly unfettered from sanctions as a result of last year's nuclear deal with the West, there are unmistakable signs that it is widening its presence in the Americas in earnest.

For over 37 years, ever since the Islamic revolution in Iran which toppled the Shah and caused a major regional shift and realignment in the Gulf region, the Arabian and Iranian sides of the Gulf have been locked in bitter rivalry, distrust and lately, a cold war atmosphere that has fomented sectarian tensions and proxy wars that stretch from Yemen to Syria. Over the past few years, I have penned numerous articles in Gulf News, in addition to delivering many lectures on the troubled GCC-Iran relations. I have described this relationship between the two sides as a cold war that keeps getting worse each passing year - with no inkling of a detente on the horizon. Moreover, I have repeatedly warned of the repercussions of the continued flagrant interference of Iran and its meddling in the affairs of GCC states - which has metastasised to other Arab countries. This is weakening other Arab states, scuppering the chances of peace, as well as fomenting sectarian tensions and exacerbating the arc of the region's crises. While the GCC and the United States supported the nuclear deal with Iran, provided it ended its nuclear arms ambitions and stopped it interfering in the affairs of GCC states, we have discovered that we have been wrong-footed by the US and are confused by Washington's reticence over Iran's systematic and alarming behaviour. Now we view the nuclear deal with scepticism.

Recent diplomatic efforts on the part of Tehran reveal it to be pursuing a two-pronged strategy towards attracting investment and reintegrating with the global economy: (1) seeking foreign capital to rebuild the country's domestic infrastructure, while (2) using Iranian capital to finance the construction of oil refineries throughout the world. With Iran's infrastructure investment needs estimated at $1 trillion over the next ten years, Tehran will be heavily reliant on project finance arrangements in order to rebuild its infrastructure. Under these arrangements, investors put up large sums of money in exchange for a return based on long-term cash flows-often for up to thirty years. Iran's heavy reliance on project financing arrangements will have consequences that far outlive the initial terms of the Iranian nuclear agreement, while creating a potentially unique set of incentives for the various parties in the event Iran defaults on its commitments or resorts to old patterns at the expiration of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). As such, Tehran's strategic thinking is clearly calculated well beyond the terms of the JCPOA. In its strategy to reintegrate with the world economy, Iran is playing the long game.


The latest report issued by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) reveals confidential exemptions that Iran was granted by the Joint Commission in order to meet its requirements for implementing the Iran deal last January. The report has sparked a debate over whether there were in fact exemptions, and what they entailed. But the more serious issue raised by this report-and emphasized by its authors-regards the question of secrecy and confidentiality surrounding elements of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and its implementation. From this perspective, the ISIS report is only the latest in a string of episodes over the past year in which issues involving secrecy (or lack of disclosure) have been exposed. Sometimes the issues have related directly to JCPOA provisions, and sometimes to the U.S. administration's portrayal of events or policies related to the deal... there is no justification for secrecy regarding the JCPOA, Iran's arrangements with the IAEA or discussions regarding implementation of the deal in the Joint Commission. When dealing with a known violator, confidentiality has no place... U.S.-Iran dynamics will be a key factor in the implementation of the deal, and in determining whether Iran is able to manipulate its way to nuclear weapons. U.S. passivity-not to mention acting as Iran's defender-risks weakening America's ability to keep Iran in line. The United States must wake up to the reality that the struggle with Iran continues, at least as far as Iran is concerned. Not responding to Iranian challenges risks losing the game.


This Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif embarked on a six-nation tour in seemingly far away Latin America "to expand political and economic relations between the two sides." But, is it so far away given Iran's stated aspirations which seem to be increasingly backed by words and deeds? Just as the foreign minister was arriving in Havana, back home the regime was announcing the establishment of the Shiite Liberation Army under the command of Major General Qasem Soleimani of the Quds Force. Though it's likely the force will be deployed largely in the Arab territories, the announcement took pains to note that Iran was prepared to deploy its forces to distant lands,






Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email press@uani.com.

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment