|
by Douglas Murray • December 10, 2016 at 11:00 am
- Remarks,
incomparably more damning icepicks than "fewer Moroccans",
[were] made by members of the Netherlands' Labour Party, who of
course were never prosecuted.
- Members of the
Netherlands' Labour Party, who never of course were prosecuted, have
wielded incomparably more damning icepicks than "fewer
Moroccans".
- The irony
cannot have been lost on the wider world that on the same day that
news of Wilders's conviction came out the other news from Holland
was the arrest of a 30 year-old terror suspect in Rotterdam
suspected of being about to carry out 'an act of terrorism'.
- Internationally
it will continuously be used against Wilders that he has been
convicted of 'inciting discrimination' even though the charge is
about a proto-crime – a crime that has not even occurred: like
charging the makers of a car chase movie for 'inciting speeding'. As
with many 'hate-crime' trials across the free world, from Denmark to
Canada, the aim of the proceedings is to blacken the name of the
party on trial so that they are afterwards formally tagged as a
lesser, or non-person. If this sounds Stalinist it is because it is.
- In the
long-term, though, there is something even more insidious about this
trial. For as we have noted here before, if you prosecute somebody for
saying that they want fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands then the
only legal views able to be expressed about the matter are that the
number of Moroccans in the country must remain at precisely present
numbers or that you would only like more Moroccans in the country.
In a democratic society this sort of matter ought to be debatable.
- If there is one
great mental note of which 2016 ought to have reminded the world, it
is how deeply unwise it is to try to police opinion. For when you do
so you not only make your society less free, but you disable
yourself from being able to learn what your fellow citizens are
actually – perhaps ever more secretly – feeling. Then one day you
will hear them.

The trial of Geert Wilders has resulted in a guilty verdict. The
court – which was located in a maximum security courthouse in the
Netherlands near Schipol airport – found the leader of the PVV (Freedom
Party) guilty of 'insulting a group' and of 'inciting discrimination'.
The trial began with a number of complaints, but the proceedings gradually
honed down onto one single comment made by Wilders at a party rally in
March 2014. This was the occasion when Wilders asked the crowd whether
they wanted 'fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the
Netherlands'. The crowd of supporters shouted 'Fewer'.
On Friday morning the court decided not to impose a jail sentence or
a fine, as prosecutors had requested. The intention of the court is
clearly that the 'guilty' sentence should be enough.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment