|
by Robbie Travers
• January 21, 2017 at 5:00 am
- Name a single
person or organisation you trust to control your speech. Whom would
you trust to control what you can read, or make decisions on what is
true and what is false for you? Whom do you trust to police what you
think?
- The German
government thinks it knows exactly who should be the arbiter of
truth and what articles you should be allowed to post. Itself!
- This would lead
to a monopolisation of the media industry. One or two large
platforms would dominate the public debate; fringe voices would be
ignored or cast aside.
- Who is to
police the police? Facebook, caught out, already had to dismiss
those compiling their trending stories, when it was revealed that
they had a runaway political bias and were routinely suppressing
(conservative) material with which they did not agree.
- The whole
censorship industry is open to abuse; presumably, that is what
censorship is for in the first place.

Name a single person or organisation you trust to control your
speech. Whom would you trust to control what you can read, or make
decisions on what is true and what is false for you? Whom do you trust to
police what you think?
The German government thinks it knows exactly who should be the
arbiter of truth and what articles you should be allowed to post. Itself!
After a bill was proposed by German lawmakers, which threatened
fines of up to 500,000 euros ($522,000) for publishing "fake
news," Facebook decided to use an organisation called Correctiv,
described as a German fact-checking non-profit organisation, to decide
whether reported stories are "real" or "fake."
This system would then encourage individual Facebook users to report
other users' posts to Correctiv. Facebook would then have Correctiv label
any of the articles "fake news," as they see fit.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment