|
by Burak Bekdil
• February 24, 2017 at 5:00 am
- Extremist
Muslims' understanding of freedom is a one-way street: Freedoms,
such as religious rights, are "good" and must be defended
if they are intended for Muslims -- often where Muslims are in
minority. But they can simply be ignored if they are intended for
non-Muslims -- often in lands where Muslims make up the majority.
- Many Muslim
countries, apparently, already have travel bans against other
Muslims, in addition to banning Israelis.
- Look at Saudi
Arabia. Deportation and a lifetime ban is the minimum penalty for
non-Muslims trying to enter the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.
- Given the state
of non-Muslim religious and human rights, and the sheer lack of
religious pluralism in most Muslim countries, why do Muslim nations
suddenly become human rights champions in the face of a ban on
travel to the U.S.?
- Meanwhile,
Muslims will keep on loving the "infidels" who support
Muslim rights in non-Muslim lands, while keeping up intimidation of
the same "infidels" in their own lands.

President Donald Trump's executive order of January 27, 2017,
temporarily limiting entry from seven majority-Muslim countries – Iran,
Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen -- for 90 days, until
vetting procedures can be put in place -- has caused international
controversy, sparking protests both in the Western and Islamic worlds,
including in increasingly Islamist Turkey.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment