|
by Giulio Meotti
• April 21, 2017 at 5:00 am
- "Those
(migrants) who come to seek freedom in France must participate
in freedom. Migrants did not come to seek asylum in Saudi
Arabia, but in Germany. Why? For security, freedom and
prosperity. So they must not come to create a new
Afghanistan," said Algerian writer Kamel Daoud. Right.
But it is the European mainstream that is letting them turn
our cultural landscape into another Afghanistan.
- The West used to be
proud of being the land of the free. European museums,
instead, are rapidly submitting to Islamic correctness. The
exhibition "Passion for Freedom" at the Mall Gallery
in London censored the light box tableaux of a family of toy
animals living in an enchanted valley.
- "The Louvre
will be dedicating a new section to the artistic heritage of
Eastern Christians", then President Nicholas Sarkozy
announced in 2010. But the project was scrapped by the
museum's new management, with the approval of President
Hollande's culture ministry. So today, the Louvre has a
section dedicated to Islamic art, but nothing on Eastern
Christianity.

The brave work of the artist Mimsy, "ISIS
Threaten Sylvania", which satirized the brutality of ISIS, was
removed from London's Mall Galleries after the British police
defined it "inflammatory." (Image source: Mimsy)
Maastricht,
in the Netherlands, is the picturesque city that gave its name to
the famous treaty signed in 1992 by the twelve nations of the
European Community at the time, and which paved the way for the
foundation of today's European Union and the single currency, the
euro.
Maastricht,
however, is also the home of "Tefaf", the most important
art and antiques fair in the world. The art work
"Persepolis" by the Italian artist Luca Pignatelli was
already scheduled when the commission ordered it removed. The work,
built in 2016, combined a Persian Islamic rug and a female head.
"We are all humbled and speechless", Pignatelli declared,
pointing out that his work had initially aroused the enthusiasm of
the commission. The fair's explanation was that Pignatelli's work
was "provocative".
|
No comments:
Post a Comment