|
In this mailing:
- Drieu Godefridi: Europe: The Great
White Death?
- Amir Taheri: The Kurdish
Referendum Imbroglio
by Drieu Godefridi • September
24, 2017 at 5:00 am
- It
will take only 30 to 40 years for the Muslim population to
become the majority in Europe. — Charles Gave, French
financier, website of the Institut des Libertés.
- What
is of concern, is that there is a sub-group of the European
population which is in the process of very efficiently wiping
itself out of existence.
- That
uttering this truth causes such mayhem and furious
condemnations in the media reveals that in Europe, not only is
the "native" population dying, but free speech as
well.
(Image
source: Eric Chan/Wikimedia Commons)
A riveting -- thanks to its subject -- paper was
posted the September 4, 2017 on the website of "Institut des
Libertés," the think tank of the great French financier
Charles Gave. In it, he asks: Does the native population -- by
which he means the white population -- of Europe face extinction?
His answer is "yes": "It is not good
or bad. IT IS", Gave writes. His basic argument is that with a
"native" rate of fertility of 1.4, a "migrant"
-- by which he means Muslim -- rate of 3.4 to 4 children per woman,
and taking the initial Muslim population to be 10% of the total, it
will take only 30 to 40 years for the Muslim population to become
the majority. Indeed, writes Gave, with a "native" rate
of 1.4 for a population of 100, after only two generations you
merely see 42 "native" children born.
by Amir Taheri • September 24,
2017 at 4:00 am
Massoud
Barzani, president of the autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government.
(Image source: U.S. Department of Defense)
What is the first thing you should do when you have
dug yourself into a hole? The obvious answer is: stop digging. This
is the advice that those involved in the imbroglio over the
so-called independence referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan, due to be
held on September 25. But still in the suspense of writing this
column, would do well to heed.
The idea of holding a referendum on so contentious
an issue at this time is bizarre, to say the least. There was no
popular demand for it. Nor could those who proposed it show which
one of Iraq's problems such a move might solve at this moment. In
other words, the move was unnecessary, in the sense that Talleyrand
meant when he said that, in politics, doing what is not necessary is
worse than making a mistake.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment