How bizarre and
unprofessional can the investigation into the Las Vegas attack get?
How has years of Muslim
Brotherhood propaganda and its ability to shut down training on Islam
inside the U.S. government impacted investigative efforts by the FBI
and local/state law enforcement?
News coverage on the event
- the "deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history" - seems to
have all but disappeared.
UTT has enumerated the
facts we know about the attack as of now, which is not the
investigative premise from which investigative action are being
taken. See our article here.
Most notably, the Islamic
State claimed the attack and the attacker as theirs on no less than
five occasions since the attack. Yet investigators are not
treating that possibility as the most likely investigative avenue to
pursue.
In speaking to an FBI
colleague, UTT was told, "Listening to FBI agents speak about
the Las Vegas attack reveals there is an automatic dismissal on their
part that this attack has anything to do with the Islamic
Movement. This attitude is so well seated in the FBI that it
drives all investigative efforts away from Islam and the Islamic
State."
Knowing and understanding
the Islamic threat and their doctrine sharia - the thing that drives
everything they do - is critical in cases like this. But at the
ground level, basic investigative steps will necessarily be missed
and are being missed because investigators, no matter how proficient
or how much experience they have, will never get to the truth because
they are programed to specifically not
get to it.
So for all of you out there
who are not investigators, yet see this event clearly because you do
understand the Islamic threat, the Muslim Brotherhood Movement, and
sharia, we (UTT) hope this helps you understand why you can see this
for what it is but investigators cannot.
The Las Vegas attack, more
than any other, puts the success of the Islamic Movement on full
display while highlighting the intentional outcome of all of their
efforts - complete investigative collapse in the face of overwhelming
reality.
One more investigative lead
that is likely not being followed as it should be...Steven Paddock's
girlfriend, Marilou Danley, is being defended by attorney Matthew
Lombard, who also defended Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols.
What are the odds?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment