from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals
The Stories Behind the News

Friday Afternoon Roundup - The New Constitution will be Made in
China

Posted: 10 Jul 2009 03:47 PM PDT

(Obama shakes hands with fellow Muslim dictator and
terrorist supporter, Khadafi.)

Obviously Obama and Khadafi do have
a lot in common. Both have Marxist and Muslim affiliations, both support
and aid terrorists... and both were born in Africa. Still Obama's chummy
meet and greet with Khadafi
has saddened and angered many of the family members of the Pan Am
Flight 103 bombing.

WASHINGTON - President Obama and Libyan dictator Moammar
Khadafy shook hands Thursday, infuriating families of victims in the
1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 by Libyan intelligence
agents.

The grip-and-grin was caught on camera during the G-8
summit of world leaders in Italy. Khadafy was there as head of the
African Union.

The encounter came as families who lost loved ones
aboard the doomed plane met with officials in Washington and the British
Consulate in Manhattan to protest the potential release of the lone
terrorist convicted in the bombing.

"This thing with Obama
happened on the same day that we spilled our guts to his own
administration that this killer should not be released! I'm disgusted
and disappointed. Obama sent the wrong message," said Stephanie
Bernstein, 58, of Bethesda, Md., who lost her husband, Michael, 36, a
lawyer who hunted Nazis for the Justice Department.

"It will be a
real horror show now if they release Megrahi," added Flynn, who broke
down in a conversation with the Daily News. Both Bernstein and Flynn
voted for Obama.

Shortly before the handshake, White House
National Security Council member Denis McDonough said Obama would greet
any leader who approached him.

"I don't think he's given much
consideration to whose hand he'll shake or whose hand he'll not shake,"
McDonough said.

Oh I'm sure Obama gave plenty of consideration to the
subject, and had say the interim President of Honduras shown up, the odds
would weigh heavily against him getting a handshake.

But that's par
for the course. And the handshake with Khadafi is not even the worst Obama
photo op to come out of the G-8 summit, there
was this gem that demonstrated how Obama is working to bring back
dignity to the Presidency, something his supporters kept complaining was
lacking under Bush.

The media has discovered the photo and is busy
spinning things Obama's way, but it's not
the only such incident involving Obama at the G-8 summit. It's not
particularly important in and of itself, just another demonstration of how
low the Trash in Chief is dragging America.

So, Obama came to the
summit. His freeloading family got another free trip at taxpayer expense,
all dressed up in black as if they were headed to a funeral, and
absolutely nothing was accomplished, as Obama's global warming plan fell
apart when India and China refused to trash their economies to accommodate
environmentalist zealots and eco-profiteers.

Another Obama trip.
Wasted.

But speaking of environmental zealots, Zombie Time and Front Page
Magazine have a shocking look at the radical face of Obama's new
Science Advisor, read environmental guru, John Holdren. It's one of those
things that demonstrates how thin a line there is between Nazi eugenicsm
and radical Environmentalism,

There are the forced abortions
(something I don't think that's what the Pro-Choice movement expected from
Obama)

Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory
population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory
abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the
population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.

Good news folks. The new Constitution will be Made in China.

One way to carry
out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be
put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not
capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really
wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption
proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for
it

I don't think the Pro-Choice movement will be fond of that one
either. Or this...

"Involuntary fertility control
...
A program of
sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the
relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be
easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
...
The
development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted
under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional
possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be
implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission,
for a limited number of births. "

And then Holdren embraces his Inner Nazi
Bureaucrat

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is
a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for
involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very
difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the
technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear
to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have
to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective,
despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite
varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must
be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no
effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or
livestock.

And in 2009, Obama nominated Dr. Mengele as his Science
Advisor. Reading quotes like this can't help but remind one of the
feasibility discussions and memos of the Final Solution.

In his
book Holdren asks,

In today's world, however, the number of children in a
family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other
highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than
one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person
from having more than two children?

Why indeed not? It's not as if we're entitled to Life,
Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That's the sort of thinking that
gets you sent to the Sterilization Camps.

The Confederate Yankee has more
commentary and summation, for those who don't want to read through the
whole thing. Holdren also called for a totalitarian world state and world
police, and the whole Fascist goody basket of swastika flavored
treats.

Suffice it to say this is about as close to Nazism in
America as any Presidential advisor has gotten in a long time. Bush
cabinet members such as Gonzalez were burned in effigy for far more views
and painted as monsters. Meanwhile the media insists on painting Holdren
as a brilliant scientist. A brilliant scientist who has views translated
from the original German.

Ir's ironic that the Washington Post can
run headlines such as "In Honduras, One-Sided News of Crisis", when in
fact it's the US media that operates the way the Iraqi Minister of
Information did, spewing back the same propaganda over and over again,
regardless of the reality of the situation.

We truly have lived to
see US news run on the standard of Saddam Hussein's Iraq with praise for
the beloved leader Hussein, and hysterical smears and rants against his
enemies. Which this week was Sarah Palin. I'm not even going to bother
digging through the latest demented smears, which rely on using her
daughter's ex-boyfriend as a top source.

Meanwhile in more Jihad
aiding and abetting news, a Der Spiegel story on the German government's
attempt to rescue the crew of a captured freighter from Somali pirates
reveals how Obama's
National Security Advisor James L Jones
aborted the rescue, thereby aiding and abetting the Islamic pirates,
and sabotaging an ally's attempt to stand up to them.

On April 25, Olaf Lindner, head of the GSG-9, practiced
for the planned rescue mission with 200 elite team members aboard the US
helicopter carrier Boxer. They were 80 kilometers (50 miles) east of
Harardhere, out of sight of the pirates, and they had helicopters,
reconnaissance drones and diving equipment at their disposal. "We're
ready," Lindner cabled to Berlin.

The cancellation of the
freighter rescue operation represents a heavy setback for German
Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, a Christian Democrat (CDU), and
Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a Social Democrat (SPD). The
two ministers were intent on ending this hostage crisis militarily, if
at all possible, and they had the backing of Chancellor Merkel, who had
asked for regular updates. Schäuble and Steinmeier, weary of the dollar
diplomacy of the past few years, were eager to set an important
international precedent -- to let the world know that the Germans are no
longer willing to pay up when blackmailed by gangsters and terrorists,
and that they are capable of a more forceful response.

Schäuble
and State Secretary Hanning criticized the military officials for
wavering too long. By then, the consensus of the first few days among
government officials had fallen apart. Hanning, dissatisfied with the
Bundeswehr's handling of the matter, turned to the Americans for help,
and the Interior Ministry requested the use of the USS
Boxer.

Senior officials at the Foreign and Defense Ministry were
not enthusiastic about the idea. Defense Minister Jung's state secretary
felt that the German ships were sufficient, and the Foreign Ministry was
opposed to depending on the help of others. The diplomats feared that
the Americans would insist on taking a more offensive approach against
the pirates, but no one anticipated that they would, in fact, eventually
take precisely the opposite position.

Before the German interior
minister could give the order for the GSG-9 to carry out its mission,
James Jones, the United States National Security Advisor, ended the
operation with a call to the German government. The risk was too high
for the US. "Boxer" was ordered back to Mombasa.

Uh huh. I just bet.

While the media is once
again busy smearing Obama's main female opponent, in Afghanistan, Sharia
has agreed to compromise by modifying a law that forced women to
submit to marital rape, to force them to do household chores. I suppose we
could speak out more, but Obama has just nominated a Science Advisor who
proposed forcibly sterilizing women.

Who knew that by 2009, the
Obama Administration would be giving the Taliban a run for their money in
the area of feminism.

Meanwhile J Street is growing shrill over
the Obama Administration's advocacy of ethnic cleansing for Jews in
Israel. Jevsektsia Street's director Isaac Luria, gave his internet goon
squad marching orders to attack Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi , the executive
director of the Israel Project, for pointing out the Obama
Administration's ethnic cleansing drive against Jews.

Isaac Luria
laughably cites a quote from Doug Bloomfield, of the PA Prime
Minister;

Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said this week
that Jews would be welcome to live in the Palestinian state and enjoy
the same rights Israeli Arabs enjoy in Israel.

Now considering that Christian Arabs, who at least are
ethnic Arabs, have been running like hell out of PA controlled
territories, to the point that they're now a tiny minority... the odds
that Jews would enjoy equal rights is about the same as the rights Jews
enjoyed in Nazi Germany.

This is the same PA which torched the
Synagogues in Gaza after Israel withdrew. Whose newspapers repeatedly call
for the murder of Jews. This is the same PA which is headed by a Holocaust
denier.

Finally since there is no such thing as an Arab Muslim
country where Jews enjoy equal rights, something Isaac Luria knows quite
well, his vicious hate campaign against Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi is based
on a blatantly false premise. Had Isaac J Luria been an American liberal,
he might get a pass for being ignorant and deluded. However Isaac J Luria
has spent enough time in Israel to know better. Certainly Jevsektsia
Street head Jeremy Ben Ami knows better.

But if Isaac J Luria is
convinced that Jews could live safely and equally under Palestinian rule,
I recommend that he put his money where his mouth is by moving to Ramallah
for a month, without any protection of journalistic credentials or embassy
contacts. Otherwise he can shut the hell up.

Finally
Yoram Ettinger closes with a brief op ed on Can Israel Afford to Concede
the Mountain Ridges of Judea and Samaria (West Bank)?

Caroline
Glick meanwhile delivers another solid article, Numbering
the days of dictators

In the face of all of this, the Obama administration has
been disturbingly timid. The White House's most consistent response to
North Korea's belligerent moves has been to ignore them and hope North
Korea decides to behave itself.

Matching their meekness toward
Iran, the G-8 leaders responded to Pyongyang's most recent provocations
with an announcement that they would like to become friends with Kim
Jong Il. As Obama put it, "It's very important for the world community
to speak to countries like Iran and North Korea and encourage them to
take a path that does not result in a nuclear arms race in places like
the Middle East."

OVER THE past several weeks, as the regimes in
Pyongyang and Teheran have become ever more brazen in demonstrating
their belligerent contempt for the West, the prevailing wisdom has
argued that the West has no good options for containing or defeating
them.

The traditional take on North Korea is that the world's
leading missile and nuclear proliferator poses less of a burden to
global stability than a post-regime North Korea filled with millions of
starving people who have been cut off from the world for 60 years. By
this thinking, the world is better off living with a psycho-state
capable of fomenting a global nuclear war than caring for its
victims.

That of course has been the theme lately from Obama's
Jewish leftist supporters. AKA Learning
to Live with a Nuclear Iran. A quote that should properly be
treated as a Chamberlain paraphrase.