Daniel
Greenfield article: Friday Afternoon Roundup - Orwell Lives
|
Posted: 24 May 2013 04:58 PM PDT
Witnesses claim it took London police 20 minutes to show up and
stop the two Muslim killers. But when it comes to something truly serious,
like protecting Muslims from elderly British women, then the coppers were on
the case.
“An 85-year-old woman has this afternoon been arrested after abuse was hurled at Muslims outside Gillingham Mosque. The pensioner was handcuffed and taken away in a van by officers attending the Canterbury Street mosque for Friday prayers." Note the "attending the prayers" part. And lest you get too mouthy on social media about it, there's a warning for you.
"A spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police said, “People
should stop and think about what they say on social media before making
statements as the consequences could be serious.”
NOT A BLOODY THING
Scholars of Islam like Prime Minister David Cameron and London
Mayor Boris Johnson insisted that the gruesome murder of a British soldier by
two Muslims shouting “Allah Akbar” and quoting the Koran had nothing to do
with Islam.
However Imam Omar Bakri Muhammad, who influenced Mujaheed Adebowale, the London beheader, disagrees saying, “Under Islam this can be justified”, And what are Imam Omar Bakri Muhammad’s thoughts on the human life of non-Muslim civilians? “We don’t make a distinction between civilians and non-civilians, innocents and non-innocents. Only between Muslims and unbelievers. And the life of an unbeliever has no value. It has no sanctity.” Nothing to do with Islam. Not a bloody thing. THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON ISLAM AND DRUGS
He used the name “Mujahid”, or holy warrior, and handed out
radical leaflets in Woolwich High Street. And he began plotting jihad — while
selling drugs back in Romford.
“He would say, ‘I’ve got some designer white shirts’ which meant crack cocaine, or ‘I’ve got black T-shirts’, which meant heroin. London Beheader Fell in With Muslim Gang, Turned to Drug Dealing and Jihad 10% of Young People in UK are Muslims ISLAM IS THE PROBLEM
London Mayor Boris Johnson has said the blame for the brutal
murder of a soldier in Woolwich lies with the ‘warped mind-set’ of his
killers. ‘One obvious point, it is completely wrong to blame this killing on
Islam.’
The point that Mayor Johnson deems so obvious that it need not even be backed up with proofs or verifications is that two Muslim terrorists quoting the Koran and carrying out an attack in line with Islamic beliefs had nothing to do with Islam. Boris Johnson is correct that the ‘warped mind-set’ of his killers is to blame. But that ‘warped mind-set’ has a name. It’s called Islam. Mayor Boris Johnson used to know that. Here’s what he wrote after the 7/7 bombings. "That means disposing of the first taboo, and accepting that the problem is Islam. Islam is the problem." London Mayor: “It Is Completely Wrong to Blame this Killing on Islam.” A COMPLETELY NORMAL GUY “He Was Just a Completely Normal Guy. He Was Interested in Islam, in Memorising the Koran.” THEY REALLY DO GIVE SO MUCH
This was not just an attack on Britain – and on our British way
of life. It was also a betrayal of Islam and of the Muslim communities who
give so much to our country,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said.
Muslim communities do indeed give so much to the UK, aside from the occasional bombing and beheading, there are the sex grooming gangs, the social welfare fraud and the drug dealing. It’s astounding really. They give so much and get so little in return. Just free homes and jail sentences. PM Cameron: “There is Nothing in Islam that Justifies this Truly Dreadful Act.” THE PURPOSE OF TERROR This George Jonas article has one of the clearest expressions of what terrorists truly aspire to.
For terror to work scaring people is necessary but not
sufficient. Even all-powerful, naked, totalitarian terror requires more than
fear to function. For the asymmetric terror of the weak -- Basque, say, or
Chechen or Uighur secessionists -- fear serves as kindling to ignite an
illusion of sympathy.
No one likes to think of himself as a coward. People resist admitting that they're afraid. Simply scaring them might even get their backs up. People prefer to think they end up yielding to what the terrorists demand, not because it's safer or more convenient, but because it's the right thing. ... Terrorism's great achievement isn't hijacking jetliners, but hijacking the debate. Successful terrorism persuades the terror-stricken that he's conscience-stricken. Once adapted and internalized by its targets, asymmetric terror can be as powerful as totalitarian terror. Ultimately, terror triumphs when it allows perpetrators to masquerade as victims. It's the intolerant demanding tolerance that bedevils Western civil liberties and anti-defamatory organizations Amnesty Will Legalize 32 Million + Add 25 Million Guest Workers KEEP THE LIE ALIVE
The United States was not incapable of using armed force over Benghazi.
Obama’s first Libya lie, the one that led to the war, was the claim that
Gaddafi forces were about to carry out a massacre in Benghazi. No such
massacre had occurred anywhere or was going to occur, but it was enough for
Obama to go to war, without ever admitting that he was at war.
Was the military power that was leveraged to defend Benghazi incapable of being leveraged to defend the mission in Benghazi? Was overthrowing Gaddafi really easier than protecting American diplomats and security personnel under siege? Benghazi was, from beginning to end, a story of appeasement gone bad. The serial lies by a serial liar have covered up the ugly truth that American lives were sacrificed on the altar of appeasement. Four men are dead and a fifth has been locked up to keep the lie alive. Obama: Serial Liar THE OTHER'S OTHER Muslim Countries are The Most Racist in the World NEUTRAL TO THE REALITY
The British version of gender-neutral, gender-free, replacing
gender-fair policy, attempted to ignore gender in military training and
resulted in a doubling of injuries for female soldiers. In gender-fair
training, women only suffered four times as many injuries as male soldiers.
In gender-free training, women suffered nearly ten times as many injuries as
male soldiers. An absurd term like gender-free could be coined, but it couldn’t
be implemented because no one can be free of their gender. Gender is not open
to regulation or deregulation. It is an absolute reality.
There’s nothing gender neutral about that. But gender-neutral really means neutral to the gender. And neutral to the gender is another way of saying that there are two differing standards. The standard changes to accommodate the gender. A Gender-Neutral Army THERE'S A REASON THE 9/11 HIJACKERS LIKED IT Paterson NJ Actually Becomes Paterstine as PLO Flag Rises Over City Hall IT'S OBAMA'S WORLD, WE JUST GET BLOWN UP IN IT
In a bizarre statement, a month after Muslim terrorists set off
bombs at the Boston Marathon that wounded 264 people, Obama claimed that,
“There have been no large-scale attacks on the United States, and our
homeland is more secure.”
The Boston terrorists only killed 3 people, but injured 264. There were at least 16 amputations of limbs. The original World Trade Center bombing resulted in six deaths and fifteen traumatic injuries. The Boston bombings are in a class with that. Obama Claims “No Large-Scale Attacks on the United States” Month After Bombs Wound 264 THE PERSONAL AND THE POLITICAL I tend to think that reposting your own Tweets in articles and blogs is a bad habit, but sometimes arguing in 140 characters condenses an idea to something closer to slogan length. Considering the usual gargantuan length of my articles, it may be worth it in this case.
@mozz71 @adamsbaldwin @boschfawstin Most
people individually are nice, on good days, but we're dealing with a group
ideology
— Daniel Greenfield(@Sultanknish) May 24, 2013
@mozz71 @adamsbaldwin @boschfawstin Most
Germans during WW2 were nice people individually. They still voted for
Hitler.
— Daniel Greenfield(@Sultanknish) May 24, 2013
@mozz71 @adamsbaldwin @boschfawstin We
interact with people on 2 levels. Interpersonally and politically
— Daniel Greenfield(@Sultanknish) May 24, 2013
@mozz71 @adamsbaldwin @boschfawstin
Everyone said the London killer was a nice guy, but his politics told him he
had to kill people
— Daniel Greenfield(@Sultanknish) May 24, 2013
TO THE MOON, MICHELLE
The graduate of Columbia, Occidental College and Harvard
declaring himself an “Honorary Morehouse Man” is already a cynical joke.
Obama never would have gone to Morehouse. The odds of him sending one of his
offspring to an HBCU is right up there with him sending them to the moon.
Obama’s Cynical Privileged Morehouse College Speech FASCISM, THE RIGHT THING FOR AMERICA?
England, in many American circles, had come to seem like Israel
today, a country that dragged the United States into wars. While Nazi
Germany, like the Muslims today, was seen as misunderstood and a victim of
history. Kennedy’s observations would not have been unusual even for many
liberal visitors older than him.
There was a sizable strain of admiration for fascism in liberal circles extending into the FDR administration. The sense was that fascists were capable of getting things done. JFK: “Fascism?’ The right thing for Germany.” EXCELSIOR!
Secondly, I understand that bringing me on as network anchor of
Zimbabwe state television has the stench of the arrogant Western imperialism
that both you and I disdain so much. After all, wise man once said, “The only
white man you can trust is a dead white man.”
Of course, your Excellency, those words were spoken by you. And I wholeheartedly agree with them. Though it is true on the outside I appear as white as the devil himself, my heart is of a different complexion altogether. I look forward to hearing from you. In trust, Keith Theodore Olbermann Cornell Class of 1979 Keith Olbermann looks for a job: The secret emails revealed WITH MINOR EDITS
Apologists for Islam often quote, out of context, a Koranic
verse, which says ‘Whosoever killeth a human being… it shall be as if he had
killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he
had saved the life of all mankind” as proof that Islam is humanitarian.
In fact this is a Talmudic quote that the Koran appropriates and then uses to spew hate against the Jews and Christians as unbelievers. Hasan, like most apologists, amends the quote removing the exception that you may kill as revenge for a killing or “for creating disorder in the land”. Those who create disorder should “be slain or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on alternate sides.” For a full measure of Mehdi’s perversity, the Koranic verse quoted by the London Beheader advocating an eye for an eye is in Koran 5:46. The one quoted by Mehdi is in 5:33.
Huffington
Post UK Director Who Called Non-Muslims Animals, Claims Islam
is Not Hateful
VIDEODROME I appeared on SUN TV briefly to discuss Obama's scandal on Michael Coren's The Arena And if you would like to hear that in a much better accent, here's Critical G reading some of my articles ASLIM, TASLIM Finally here's a great article by Oleg Atbashian on the totalitarian nature of the left.
How is it possible to hold so many mutually exclusive beliefs?
To preach tolerance and be so intolerant? To grieve for terror victims and
justify terrorism? To stand up for workers and destroy their jobs? To march
for peace and defend the militants? To denounce corruption and vote for the
corrupt? To espouse non-violence and commit violent acts? To speak of
liberties and promote government dictate? To bolster feminism and deride
successful women? To cheer gays and aid the gay-bashers in the Middle East?
To champion minorities as a group and hold them down as individuals? To care
about the children and condemn them to intellectual mutilation? To denounce
guns and hire armed bodyguards? To support the troops and side with their
murderers? To demand love and be full of hate?
The bad news is that these are not contradictions. Worse yet, sensible people will keep losing ground to those whom they shrug off as bumbling sacks of absurdities, for as long as they don’t understand that the above paradoxical statements aren’t, in fact, oxymorons, but contain a very consistent logic. In this sense, the best key to unlocking the mystery of the Progressive Chauvinist mind, breaking the leftist code, and discerning their collectivist morality is a statement attributed to Karl Marx, which, regardless of whether he wrote it or not, is perfectly aligned with the moral philosophy of Progressive Chauvinism: “The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism”
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment