In this mailing:
- Raymond Ibrahim: "It Was Like a
War against the Church"
- Amir Taheri: Donald Trump and
the Carl Schmitt Spectrum
by Raymond Ibrahim • July 22, 2018
at 5:00 am
- According to the
well-known Conditions of Omar, which are believed to have
been promulgated by the second caliph of the same name, churches
may not have bells or visible crosses.
- "The attack on
Christians was simply because of the pariah status they have in
Pakistan.... A consequence of years of hate ideology having been
inculcated in the minds of young people in Pakistan, through the
use of media and a national curriculum that demonizes
minorities." — A human rights activist, Pakistan.
- "They sent me
warnings through friends, telling me to stop talking about Jesus
or risk getting killed. They said they knew it was easy to kill
Christians because [Christians] don't have any weapons. They can
simply be slaughtered." — A man in Mali, World Watch
Monitor Mali, December 11, 2017.
The
Johanneum Gymnasium in Lüneburg, a 600-year-old high school,
"ditched Christmas celebrations during class time after a Muslim
pupil said that carols were incompatible with Islam," according
to a report. (Image source: Stonecello/Wikimedia Commons)
Christian Carnage and Attacked Churches in Egypt
As a reflection of the enmity that Christmas provokes
in the Islamic world, "Egypt's interior ministry... said it
would be allocating 230,000 security personnel to secure the
country's Christmas celebrations," the Egyptian newspaper
al-Ahram reported, "to protect 2,626 churches nationwide during
the celebrations." Security measures were further "updated
to ensure the safety of CCTV and metal detectors systems at all
churches across the country."
Despite these precautions, Muslim assailants managed
to slaughter Christians and terrorize churches:
On December 9 in Cairo, two Islamic terror attacks
claimed a total of eight Christian lives and wounded several others.
In the first attack, Muslim militants raided a Christian-owned
appliance store and killed two Christian brothers.
by Amir Taheri • July 22, 2018 at
4:00 am
- In its boldest form,
the "foe" is the force that wishes not only to defeat
you in a contest or even a war but strives to destroy you.
- In democratic
societies, the choice may be between "friend" and
"enemy". Here, the enemy does not want to wipe you out
or even to force you to submit to all his wishes. He wants to
deny you a bigger share of power which he wants to keep for
himself.
- The task of diplomacy
and political leadership is to go through the Schmittian
spectrum, turning foe into enemy, enemy into adversary,
adversary into rival, rival into ally and ally into friend. May
be, just may be, in his unorthodox way Trump is trying to do
just that. So, let's give him a chance. What do you say?
US President
Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Theresa May, on July 13, 2018 in
Aylesbury, England. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Has Donald Trump been reading Carl Schmitt in secret?
The thought came to mind the other day when the US president was
concluding his two-day "working visit" to the United
Kingdom with a series of impromptu statements before flying to
Scotland to play golf. It was by using the term "foe" to describe
Russia, China and even the European Union that Trump reminded me of
Schmitt.
"We have many foes," Trump asserted while
implicitly casting himself as the embodiment of a total state that
represents the people, the ordinary folk, the Joe down the block, as
opposed to the sneering and self-serving elite.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment