In this mailing:
Anjem Choudary, in His Own Words
by Soeren Kern
• September 30, 2014 at 5:00 am
"In
the Quran it is not allowed for you to feel sorry for non-Muslims. I don't
feel sorry for him." — Anjem Choudary.
"Eventually
the whole world will be governed by Shari'ah & Muslims will have
authority over China Russia USA etc This is the promise of Allah." —
Anjem Choudary.
"Under
the Koran the sale of alcohol is prohibited and if one were to also drink
alcohol, that would be 40 lashes." — Anjem Choudary.
"We
[Muslims] take the Jizya, which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to
take money from the kuffar [non-Muslim]. They give us the money. You work,
give us the money, Allahu Akhbar. We take the money." — Anjem Choudary.
The British Islamist firebrand Anjem Choudary has been released from
police custody after he was arrested for allegedly being a member of a banned
terrorist group.
Choudary and nine other radical Muslims were detained during dawn raids
in London on September 25 as part of an ongoing Metropolitan Police
investigation into Islamist-related terrorism.
Choudary—one of the most high-profile jihadists in the United Kingdom,
and well known for his relentless resolve to implement Islamic Sharia law
there—is a former spokesman of the Muslim extremist group, al-Muhajiroun
(Arabic: The Emigrants).
Al-Muhajiroun—which repeatedly celebrated the terrorist attacks on the
United States in September 2001—was banned under the UK Terrorism Act 2000,
in January 2010.
Why State Dept. Defends UNRWA's Artificial "Refugee" Designations
by Steven J. Rosen
• September 30, 2014 at 4:00 am
The U.S.
State Department has chosen to act as UNRWA's patron and the protector of its
mission, perpetuating and expanding the refugee issue as a source of conflict
against Israel.
Apparently
more Israeli houses hurt peace, but multiplying the number of refugees is
fine.
Here is a paradox: UNRWA, the United Nations agency that manages the
Palestinian refugee issue, follows rules that contradict United States law
and policy, and its practices result in perpetuating and multiplying the
refugee problem rather than resolving it. Yet the U.S. Department of State
gives unquestioning support to UNRWA's refugee designation rules[1], even on
occasion defending them in detail. How can this be?
For example, almost two million Palestinians who have long been settled
in Jordan and have for decades enjoyed Jordanian citizenship[2], are
routinely counted as "refugees" by UNRWA, and the State Department
supports it. This, in spite of the fact that, under U.S. law, a person who
has citizenship in the country where he resides, and enjoys the protection of
that state, cannot lawfully be eligible for refugee status.[3] How can State
justify this contradiction?
|
||
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Anjem Choudary, in His Own Words
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment