Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Eye on Iran: In Nuclear Talks, Iran Seeks to Avoid Specifics






Join UANI  
 Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
Top Stories

NYT: "If an agreement to limit Iran's nuclear capability is reached by deadline in the next seven days, one thing may be missing: an actual written accord, signed by the Iranians. Over the past few weeks, Iran has increasingly resisted any kind of formal 'framework' agreement at this stage in the negotiations, preferring a more general statement of 'understanding' followed by a final accord in June, according to Western diplomats involved in the talks. Should that position hold - one of the many unknowns of the coming days - the United States and its five negotiating partners may find themselves in the uncomfortable position of describing the accord as they understand it while the Iranians go home to offer their own version. That poses a weighty political challenge to the Obama administration, which is already under pressure to present Iran's commitments to a suspicious Congress by early April, in an effort to hold off the passage of sanctions or a bill that would require Congress to sign off on any agreement. Just last week, as the previous round of talks with Iran came to a close, a senior American official involved in the negotiations said that the framework accord with Iran would have to be more than a political declaration of intentions. Rather, it would have to contain a 'quantifiable dimension.' There is a lot to quantify, from the number of uranium-enriching centrifuges that would remain spinning to exactly how Iran would change the design of a reactor that is under construction to limit the production of plutonium, another pathway to a bomb. But Iran says it will not agree to such specifics, at least for now." http://t.uani.com/1CanOUv

AP: "An Iranian official on Tuesday rebuked the chief of the U.N. atomic agency for demanding snap inspections of Iran's nuclear sites, saying the request hindered efforts to reach an agreement with world powers, state TV reported... Earlier this month Yukiya Amano, the head of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, said Tehran should agree to snap inspections to reassure the international community. Iran's nuclear spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said Amano's comments harm the delicate negotiations. 'It would be much better if Amano only talked about the IAEA's seasonal and monthly reports,' he said, according to state TV. Last June, Kamalvandi said Iran may accept snap inspections as part of a final nuclear agreement." http://t.uani.com/1BLWyZ5

HuffPost: "A report from The Wall Street Journal that Israel spied on U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations and then fed that information to members of Congress seemed like a shocker at first blush when it published Monday night. While spying is a seedy but accepted part of geopolitics, using intelligence information to sway Congress against President Barack Obama's agenda on Iran was seen as a step too far by senior administration officials cited in the report. But when talk of the story began circulating on Capitol Hill, lawmakers seemed almost uniformly unfazed. Most denied receiving information from the Israeli government, and some questioned whether leaked information about the nuclear negotiations was from Israel, rather than one of the five countries partnering with the U.S. in the talks. 'Actually, one of my reactions was, 'Why haven't they been coming up here sharing information with me?'' Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) told reporters... I think you all understand what's happening here. You understand who's pushing this out,' Corker continued, implying that the recent Wall Street Journal story was an attempt by the White House to vilify the Israelis... '[The Obama Administration has] been reluctant to have an honest, full debate about the Iran deal, and about rapprochement with the Iranian regime. It's been about obfuscation and saying that people who oppose the deal are war mongers,' said David Ibsen, the executive director of United Against Nuclear Iran. 'If you look at what's going on, you'd think that Tom Cotton and Benjamin Netanyahu are the greatest threats to U.S. national security in the last 30 years. Meanwhile, [Syrian President Bashar] Assad is dropping chemical weapons again, there is a total vacuum of authority in Libya, Iran is expanding in influence across the region. And all we hear about is the Bibi speech to Congress and the letter to Iran from the 47 Republicans,' Ibsen continued." http://t.uani.com/1BmyMng

   
Nuclear Program & Negotiations

Reuters: "France warned on Tuesday that 'insufficient' progress has been made toward a nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers with specific disparities over research and development and the issue of sanctions. 'Iran must now make difficult choices if it truly wishes to regain the trust of the international community,' French U.N. Ambassador Francois Delattre told a United Nations Security Council meeting on U.N. sanctions on Iran... The biggest sticking point, Western officials say, remains Iran's demands for no limits on research and development of advanced centrifuges, which purify uranium for use in nuclear reactors or, if highly enriched, in weapons. Another issue is sanctions. Iran wants all U.N. sanctions lifted immediately after a deal is agreed, along with the most crippling U.S. and European Union restrictions on Tehran's energy and financial sectors. 'Iran will need to show greater flexibility and take some tough decisions in the coming days if we are to achieve a deal,' Britain's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Peter Wilson told the council. During talks last week, France was insisting on a longer period of restrictions on Iran's nuclear work and also opposed the idea of suspending some U.N. sanctions relatively quickly." http://t.uani.com/1Gl3pPP

WashPost: "The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said that Iran has failed to provide the information or access needed to allay the agency's concerns about the weapons potential of the country's nuclear program. With the deadline nearing for international talks on constraining Iran's nuclear program, Yukiya Amano, director general of the IAEA, said in an interview that Iran has replied to just one of a dozen queries about 'possible military dimensions' of past nuclear activities. Amano said that Iran has provided only 'very limited' information about two other issues, while the rest have not been addressed at all. Recently, the progress is very limited,' he said. Amano said that the six global powers negotiating with Iran should insist that the country implement the additional protocol that would allow IAEA inspectors to go anywhere at any time to examine sites suspected of harboring secret nuclear weapons development... That additional protocol, Amano said, will be 'very much needed. It will give us more powerful tools to look at activities not declared to us.'" http://t.uani.com/1FUIpPg

Reuters: "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday the U.S. Senate would vote on a bill to toughen sanctions on Iran if international negotiators miss a deadline at the end of this month for reaching a framework nuclear agreement. 'Another heavy dose of sanctions would be an appropriate remedy if there's no agreement at all,' McConnell told a weekly news briefing. If there is an agreement, he said lawmakers would move ahead on a bill that would require President Barack Obama to submit the deal for Congress' approval. Obama has threatened to veto both bills... Separately, Republican Senator Mark Kirk, a co-author of the sanctions bill, told reporters on Tuesday he would introduce legislation recommending new sanctions on Iran as an amendment to a budget resolution now being considered by the Senate." http://t.uani.com/1ESRVAR

Reuters: "Iran will insist that all sanctions against it are lifted as a condition for a nuclear deal, the foreign minister said on Wednesday, showing no sign of compromise on a major sticking point in its talks with world powers set to resume this week. 'This is the position that the government has insisted on from the start,' Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif was quoted by the official IRNA news agency as saying... Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all matters of state in the Islamic Republic, said in a speech last week that the immediate lifting of sanctions must be a part of any nuclear deal. Western officials have consistently rejected that demand, and a senior European negotiator last week said the immediate lifting of all sanctions was 'out of the question.'" http://t.uani.com/1BmwR26

Sanctions Relief

Trend: "Some 1.147 million cars have been produced in Iran during the last Iranian fiscal year (ended on March 20). The figure indicates 54 percent increase compared to the preceding year, Iran's industry, mines and trade ministry's official SHATA news portal reported. Sedan and pickup trucks output stood at 1.126 million in the last fiscal year. Iran also produced 20,679 trucks as well as 580 buses and minibuses in the 12-month period. The country's giant car manufacturer Iran Khodro (IKCO) produced 616,000 cars during the last Iranian fiscal year, 69 percent more year on year." http://t.uani.com/1CMjuN5

Trend: "The inflation rate for the 12-month period to twelfth Iranian calendar month of Esfand (ended on March 20) stood at 14.8 percent, Adel Azar, head of the Statistics Center of Iran said. The figure is 0.4 percent less compared to the preceding month. The country's point-to-point inflation in the mentioned month was 14.2 percent, 0.2 percent less than the previous month, Azar said, Iran's official IRIB news agency reported March 21." http://t.uani.com/1BpkTUu

Iraq Crisis

Politico: "As negotiations on a possible nuclear deal approach a March 31 deadline, U.S. officials are increasingly alarmed about Iran's expanding military presence in Iraq - and the threat it may pose to American soldiers in the country. Two scenarios are of particular concern, officials say. One is that a collapse of the nuclear talks could escalate tensions between Iran and the U.S., emboldening Iranian hard-liners and potentially leading to attacks on Americans in Iraq. The other is that increased U.S. efforts to oust Syrian president Bashar Assad, a close ally of Tehran, could provoke retaliation from Iran. White House officials who oppose greater involvement in Syria's civil war often cite concern for the safety of Americans in Iraq as a reason for caution, sources said. In either case, U.S. officials fear, Iran could direct the Iraqi Shiite militias under its control to attack U.S. troops aiding the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant." http://t.uani.com/18X0r6P

WSJ: "The U.S. has started providing Iraq with aerial intelligence in the stalled battle to oust Islamic State from Tikrit, drawing the American military into closer coordination with Iranian-backed militias spearheading the offensive. Military officials said they aren't working directly with Iran. But the intelligence will be used to help some 20,000 Iranian-backed Shiite militia fighters who make up the bulk of the force that has been struggling for weeks to retake the strategic city... The U.S. involvement could pave the way for American airstrikes in Tikrit, hometown of onetime dictator Saddam Hussein." http://t.uani.com/1GUbqJC

Yemen Crisis

Reuters: "Saudi Arabia is moving heavy military equipment including artillery to areas near its border with Yemen, U.S. officials said on Tuesday, raising the risk that the Middle East's top oil power will be drawn into the worsening Yemeni conflict. The buildup follows a southward advance by Iranian-backed Houthi Shi'ite militants who took control of the capital Sanaa in September and seized the central city of Taiz at the weekend as they move closer to the new southern base of U.S.-supported President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi. The slide toward war in Yemen has made the country a crucial front in Saudi Arabia's region-wide rivalry with Iran, which Riyadh accuses of sowing sectarian strife through its support for the Houthis. The conflict risks spiraling into a proxy war with Shi'ite Iran backing the Houthis, whose leaders adhere to the Zaydi sect of Shi'ite Islam, and Saudi Arabia and the other regional Sunni Muslim monarchies backing Hadi." http://t.uani.com/1CpGQHT

Domestic Politics

Al-Monitor: "Youness Asakere, an Iranian fruit vendor who set himself on fire in front of the Khoramshahr municipality in protest after his fruit stand was confiscated by authorities, died March 22. His death, and the lack of broader attention by Iranian society, has stirred many questions among activists and analysts on social media. Family members of Asakere, who was an ethnic Arab, said that the fruit stand was his sole means of income and that he had been previously denied official permits to have a stand." http://t.uani.com/1CaoXeK

Reuters: "Iran is storing more than 20 million barrels of crude on board its supertankers moored off the country as western sanctions continued to curb Iranian oil sales globally, Reuters data showed on Wednesday. Some analysts and traders expect the OPEC producer to ship the stored oil to its customers once Iran reaches a deal with western powers on its nuclear programme which would phase out economic sanctions on the Gulf producer. Nine of the 14 Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) are full while the rest are filled at least 60 percent with oil in the past month, according to data collated by Thomson Reuters Oil Research & Forecasts." http://t.uani.com/1COJPKD

Opinion & Analysis

Thomas Friedman in NYT: "I can think of many good reasons to go ahead with the nuclear deal with Iran, and I can think of just as many reasons not to. So, if you're confused, let me see if I can confuse you even more. The proposed deal to lift sanctions on Iran - in return for curbs on its bomb-making capabilities so that it would take at least a year for Tehran to make a weapon - has to be judged in its own right. I will be looking closely at the quality of the verification regime and the specificity of what happens if Iran cheats. But the deal also has to be judged in terms of how it fits with wider American strategic goals in the region, because a U.S.-Iran deal would be an earthquake that touches every corner of the Middle East. Not enough attention is being paid to the regional implications - particularly what happens if we strengthen Iran at a time when large parts of the Sunni Arab world are in meltdown. Thomas Friedman in NYT: "The Obama team's best argument for doing this deal with Iran is that, in time, it could be 'transformational.' That is, the ending of sanctions could open Iran to the world and bring in enough fresh air - Iran has been deliberately isolated since 1979 by its ayatollahs and Revolutionary Guard Corps - to gradually move Iran from being a revolutionary state to a normal one, and one less inclined to threaten Israel. If one assumes that Iran already has the know-how and tools to build a nuclear weapon, changing the character of its regime is the only way it becomes less threatening. The challenge to this argument, explains Karim Sadjadpour, a Middle East specialist at the Carnegie Endowment, is that while the Obama team wants to believe this deal could be 'transformational,' Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, 'sees it as transactional' - Iran plugs its nose, does the deal, regains its strength and doubles-down on its longstanding revolutionary principles. But, then again, you never know. What starts out as transactional can end up being transformational in ways that no one can prevent or predict. A second argument is that Iran is a real country and civilization, with competitive (if restricted) elections, educated women and a powerful military. Patching up the U.S.-Iran relationship could enable America to better manage and balance the Sunni Arab Taliban in Afghanistan, and counterbalance the Sunni jihadists, like those in the Islamic State, or ISIS, now controlling chunks of Iraq and Syria. The United States has relied heavily on Saudi Arabia, ever since Iran's 1979 revolution, and while the Saudi ruling family and elites are aligned with America, there is a Saudi Wahhabi hard core that has funded the spread of the most puritanical, anti-pluralistic, anti-women form of Islam that has changed the character of Arab Islam and helped to foster mutations like ISIS. There were no Iranians involved in 9/11. Then again, it was Iranian agents who made the most lethal improvised explosives in Iraq that killed many American troops there. And it was Iran that encouraged its Iraqi Shiite allies to reject any extended U.S. military presence in Iraq and to also overplay their hand in stripping power from Iraqi Sunnis, which is what helped to produce the ISIS counterreaction. 'In the fight against ISIS, Iran is both the arsonist and the fire brigade,' added Sadjadpour. To Saudi Arabia, he added, the rise of ISIS is attributable to the repression of Sunnis in Syria and Iraq by Iran and its Shiite clients. To Tehran, the rise of ISIS is attributable to the financial and ideological support of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies... Then again, if this nuclear deal with Iran is finalized, and sanctions lifted, much more Iranian oil will hit the global market, suppressing prices and benefiting global consumers. Then again, Iran would have billions of dollars more to spend on cyberwarfare, long-range ballistic missiles and projecting power across the Arab world, where its proxies already dominate four Arab capitals: Beirut, Baghdad, Damascus and Sana." http://t.uani.com/1BqtEhb

Eli Lake in Bloomberg: "'To understand how the hurried evacuation of U.S. special operations forces from Yemen is connected to Iran's regional strategy, look no further than Atheel al-Nujaifi, the Sunni governor of Iraq's Nineveh Province. On Sunday, Nujaifi sent a letter to U.S. leaders warning that his country was at a tipping point with regard to Iranian influence. As U.S. forces wait on the sidelines in an Iranian-led campaign to liberate Tikrit, Nujaifi said he worried that his country was being lost to Iran. In other words, what has just happened in Yemen -- where an Iranian-armed and advised militia has overthrown a pro-American government -- could happen soon in Iraq. Nujaifi, whose province includes Iraq's second-largest city of Mosul, addressed his letter to Representative Ed Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and asked that it be placed into the record for a hearing this week on the administration's strategy against the Islamic State. The Iraqi governor also sent copies to President Barack Obama, House Speaker John Boehner, Secretary of State John Kerry and John Allen, the retired Marine general who is U.S. envoy to the coalition against the Islamic State. Royce told me that he agrees with Nujaifi that the administration has failed to challenge Iran's efforts to expand throughout the Middle East. 'The fact that the governor is compelled to reach out directly to us in Congress speaks volumes about the sway that Iran holds over critical positions in the government in Baghdad,' he said. Nujaifi wrote that Iran 'has essentially taken over the fight in Iraq against ISIS.' He added, 'But the threat goes even deeper -- there is a grave and immediate threat that Iran is taking over decisive points in the government of Iraq itself.' Some may see that as a statement of the obvious. It has been a refrain for years that America did the fighting in Iraq but Iran won the war. Iran's Shiite government already has considerable influence with the Shiite-majority that rules Iraq today. But this was not always the case." http://t.uani.com/1ET8Wev
        

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment