|
STOP WITH THIS
“SELF- RADICALIZATION”
CRAP!
SAYFULLO SAIPOV
Devout Muslim
The expiration date for this
nonsensical term has passed
and it’s time
to deal with the harsh truth about Islam.
Following the Muslim jihad truck attack in New York City the term
“self-radicalization” has become a household concept.
This is very bad.
For anyone who continues to foolishly use the term,
“self-radicalization” you must either abandon the actual meaning of
words or realize that you are propagating an erroneous
understanding of the traditional
doctrines of Islam.
Truth-speakers hate when this happens, Sayfullo Saipov loves
it.
Almost as much as he loved killing and maiming non-believers with a
rental truck.
Here are some simple facts to stimulate your proper thinking about
“self-radicalization.” First some definitions:
- “Self” means…Self
- “Radicalize” means…to make radical
- “Radical” means…favoring drastic
reform from the traditional
When we put the actual meaning of these words together
“self-radicalization” reads like this:
“A person
committed to drastic reform of some tradition.”
Now, here’s where the weak-minded drive the English language off
the rails by changing this simple definition to a more socially
acceptable definition like this:
“That
crazy-ass Muslim, who is probably mentally ill, who just killed a
bunch of innocent people became that way in some unknowable way,
through the influence of nothing while sitting in his garden
smoking from a hookah!”
Once this “socially comfortable,” detached from reality definition
gets into the public square, usually through the 24-hour news
cycle, then somehow this abolition of the English language becomes
a mainstream belief for those among the weak-minded.
Once accepted as mainstream then there is no turning back to the
truth, it is too late, too much stupidity to overcome…the bad guys
win, again.
Now, back to the real definition of “self-radicalization,”
“A person
committed to drastic reform of some tradition.”
It is here that the weak-minded do their bait & switch on the
word tradition
with the inference being that the tradition of Islam never heard
of the words sword,
beheading, submission, infidel, kill, enmity, or jihad.
The weak-mined paint some traditional
image of a blue-sky Islam with streaming rivers, smiling faces and
people hugging each other while running through fields of flowers.
You know that blue-sky image, just like the image on every Islamic
flag minus the swords, AK 47’s and Allahu Akbars.
So, the proper understanding of self-radicalization lives or dies
on the TRUE tradition
of Islam. Now really, do I have to take time and lie through my
teeth about what everyone sees with their own eyes?
Violence, war,
death and destruction are the tools used by the
“greatest man,” Mohammed and his followers to accomplish their
First Jihad and Second Jihad successes and now working on the Third
Global Jihad. If you reject this factual aspect of history what do
you believe? Did Mohammed go door-to-door sharing the love of Allah
and how his grace could save mankind from a life of desperation and
an eternity of destruction?
Was that how Islam conquered the world, TWO times, never using
those swords or AK’s?
So can we agree that the tradition
of Islam directs
the war-fighting actions of its men?
Ask New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio or Governor Coumo if this jihad tradition is
true and they will have you arrested for violating the safe-space
of the Muslim Brotherhood in New York!
Talk to the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle-East, or any Islamic
scholar from Al Azar in Egypt, or any Ayatollah in Iran or read
Reliance, the handbook of Islam, and they will tell you exactly
this - the
tradition of Islam directs the war-fighting actions of its men.
Well if this is true, and it is, then the weak-minded must unravel
this enigma.
How can
Sayfullo Saipov radicalize
himself to drastically reform the tradition he fully believes in,
to change that tradition into the blue-sky image of Islam that he
rejects?
Do you see how crazy this puzzle becomes when we abandon the true
meaning of words and history?
Consider this alternative explanation that maintains the integrity
of words and the facts of history.
In that the Muslim terrorist, Sayfullo Saipov, is following the
historic, doctrinal tradition
of Islam he obviously has no interest in “drastically reforming”
that tradition
to the blue-sky version pushed by those well-know Islamic sages,
DeBlasio and Coumo. Instead, the killer is devoutly following the
exact traditions
of doctrinal Islam and is no more radical than a Christian who
devoutly follows the traditions
of Jesus Christ. If words have meanings then it is really those
Muslims who push Islam as a “religion of peace” who are the radicals,
drastically trying to change from the traditions of Islamic jihad to
a blue-sky, interfaith nonsensical view of doctrinal Islam.
Now, non-Muslims may prefer the blue-sky Islam but as we know,
preference does not dictate reality!
If you are following this reasoning you may be getting a bit uneasy
in your belly as the fog is slowly clearing and you are starting to
see that the Muslims jihadis are really the most pleasing to Allah
and Mohammed as they devoutly follow the doctrinal traditions
of Islam!
But, this can’t be, you cry out! How can a “religion-of-peace,”
have a tradition
of violence?
A casual reading of Islamic scriptures substantiates the tradition of
Islamic violence as a modus operandi in fighting the unbeliever,
creating terror and pleasing Allah.
Quran 8:12
"I will
cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore
strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
If you are Sayfullo Saipov and you want to devoutly follow Mohammad
and Allah and you read many verses like Quran 8:12, is it “radical”
from Mohammad’s point of view to run a bunch of infidels over with
a truck, in a sinful city on a pagan holiday?
Ah, now you are starting to understand the conclusive argument that
Sayfullo Saipov is NOT a radical
Muslim but a devout
Muslim, following the directives of the Quran, the words of the
Prophet and the traditions
of Islam. Saipov is NOT “self-radicalized,” but simply a student of
traditional
Islam deeply engrossed in an on-line study program, just like
millions of other students doing course work. There is nothing
“self” about this process, it requires the participation and
assistance of many other fellow travelers.
It is about this time that the weak-minded start screaming and
calling me a “hater” for accurately explaining the history,
doctrine and traditions of Mohammad’s Islam. When asked to point
out a flaw in the analysis the weak-minded scream more with spit
flying from their cursing mouths while they walk away, unable to
engage and discuss civilly.
I feel their pain.
If the real radical Muslim is the one who wants to change the
factual traditions
of Islamic jihad to a more benign, pot-luck kind of
lovey-dovey religion then you can imagine the internecine battles
that could occur.
Oh really, check the newsfeed on your phone any time of the day and
you will see multiple battlefronts of Muslim-on-Muslim, killing and
slaughtering fellow-believers! It ain’t a big jump from Muslims
justifying killing each other to Sayfullo Saipov carefully planning
the brutal murder of non-believers for the sake of the Islamic
State and Allah, very close to a spectacular Islamic success, in
the greatest city on earth!
Will there be more Muslim truck attacks in the United States?
YES.
Is there any hope to defeat a devout Muslim killing machine,
following the doctrinal traditions
of Islam, seeking to please Allah, with an ultimate hope of
Paradise?
NO.
As long as weak-minded people like Mayor DeBlasio and Governor
Cuomo are in charge of defeating traditional
Islam, we
lose.
As long as America refuses to understand the traditional
doctrines of historic Islam, doctrines that mandate the submission
of all mankind to Islam, we
lose.
As long as Law Enforcement is obstructed in their investigations of
Islamic organizations and people who are traditional,
devout Muslims, we
lose.
As long as intelligent people continue to speak gibberish with the
obfuscating concept, self-radicalization,
we lose.
Looks like
we lose folks…..
Tom Trento
/ 11.2.17
PLEASE MAKE A
MINIMUM $25 DONATION TO KEEP US IN THE FIGHT
|
PLEASE
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
FORWARD
THIS EMAIL!
|
|
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment