Join UANI
Top
Stories
Bloomberg: "Iran will invite international
oil companies to submit bids in October under the long-awaited new
contract model for energy investors, as the OPEC producer seeks billions
of dollars to boost output after years of international sanctions. The
government will invite companies to bid to develop the South Azadegan
field on Iran's southwestern border with Iraq during the week of Oct.
14-20, said Ali Kardor, managing director of the National Iranian Oil
Co., according to state news agency IRNA. The company expects to sign
three contracts worth a total of $10 billion by March 2017, he said. 'We
are calling for technical documents for a tender offer under the
framework of the new oil contract model,' Kardor said. 'We will begin sending
letters to international oil companies to inform them of the relevant
issues next week.'" http://t.uani.com/2bSYlcm
LAT: "Eight months after international
sanctions were lifted in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program,
Iran's long-suffering people are still waiting for change. President
Hassan Rouhani's promises of new jobs and greater incomes haven't been
met. Foreign investment has been slow to materialize. Prices of basic
goods continue to rise, a reliable marker of misery in an economy
struggling to reconnect to the outside world. Under the arched, sky-lit
passageways of Tehran's centuries-old grand bazaar, where shoppers
lingered at display windows and laborers pushed handcarts piled high with
Iranian-made shoes and housewares, many shared a similar lament. 'Since
the sanctions were lifted, things have become even worse,' Behnaz Abbasi,
a 26-year-old accountant, said while browsing a cramped shop stacked with
dusty local carpets. Abbasi and her fiancé, an electrical contractor,
said prices for meat and some vegetables had doubled over the last two
years. Even with both their salaries, they could barely afford the $300
monthly rent in the small apartment they will share in blue-collar east
Tehran. 'We thought things would get better,' she said, 'but for us it's
as if the deal never happened.' ... Rumors now swirl in Tehran that
Ahmadinejad - or another conservative opposed to rapprochement with the U.S.
- could challenge Rouhani, who is up for reelection next June. 'For sure,
the next president of Iran will be anti-American,' said theology teacher
Hadi Panahian, 29. 'It's impossible for Rouhani to be reelected.'" http://t.uani.com/2bwtaoZ
UN: "The Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights in Iran, Ahmed Shaheed, has expressed outrage
at the execution on 27 August of 12 people, including Alireza Madadpour,
on drug-related charges. Mr. Shaheed had appealed publicly on 26 August
to the Iranian authorities not to go ahead with the planned executions at
Karaj Central Prison. 'The execution of individuals for drug-related
offences is simply illegal,' Mr. Shaheed said, noting that international
law only allows the imposition of the death penalty for the 'most serious
crimes', where there is intentional killing, and after a fair trial that
respects the most stringent due process guarantees. None of these conditions
were respected, at least in the case of Mr. Madadpour. 'Combating drug
trafficking, a serious concern in Iran, does not justify the use of the
death penalty in drug-related cases,' the Special Rapporteur stressed.
'The execution of Mr. Madadpour and 11 others shows the Iranian
authorities' complete disregard of its obligations under international
human rights law and especially of international fair trial standards and
due process guarantees,' Mr. Shaheed added." http://t.uani.com/2bOqgrS
Nuclear
& Ballistic Missile Program
The Hill: "The State Department said
Monday it is concerned about Iran state media reports that the country
has deployed an advanced missile defense system around its Fordow
underground uranium facility. The S-300 surface-to-air missile system was
sold to Iran by Russia over U.S. objections, after an international
accord was reached last July that lifted sanctions on Iran in exchange for
limits to its nuclear program. 'We've seen the reports of this
deployment. Obviously, that's of concern to us because we have long
objected to the sale of Iran -- of these kinds of capabilities. So as we
get more information, obviously, we're going to stay in close
consultation with partners going forward,' said State Department press
secretary John Kirby said at a briefing. Kirby said Secretary of State
John Kerry did not raise the issue during talks with Russia's foreign
minister last week, but said, 'it is an issue that the secretary has been
very clear ... about in the past on numerous occasions.' ... U.S.
officials and allies are concerned that the deployment of the S-300,
which intercepts missiles, would limit potential future military options.
Last August, the Pentagon expressed objections to the sale, but said it
was 'confident' the president would 'have all the options he needs' to
counteract the system. In October, former Marine Corps commandant Retired
Gen. James Conway warned the S-300's deployment 'would be a game changer
in the region.'" http://t.uani.com/2bOoFSO
U.S.-Iran
Relations
Fox News: "Dangerous confrontations
between Iran and the U.S. Navy are becoming even more frequent than
previously estimated, Fox News has learned. According to new data shared
Monday with Fox News by a U.S. defense official, the number of
provocative interactions between Iranian vessels and the U.S. Navy in the
Persian Gulf nearly doubled in the first half of 2016 compared with the
same time period a year ago. 'In the first half of 2016, we have seen
nearly twice as many unprofessional and/or unsafe interactions when
compared to the first half last year. That's a disturbing rise and it has
continued into the second half of the year,' said the official, who
requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.
In the first half of 2016, there were 19 dangerous interactions with the
Iranians, which the U.S. Navy characterized as 'unsafe and
unprofessional.' In the first half of 2015, that number was 10, according
to the official. The Iranian vessels acted as the aggressors every time,
according to the U.S. Navy. The account follows a Fox News report on
Friday citing estimates that such confrontations are up more than 50
percent this year. The defense official, though, said Monday the U.S.
Navy had gone through its numbers over the weekend and reclassified some
of them. (U.S. Central Command had issued a statement in July saying
there were 26 dangerous interactions in the first half of 2016.) The new
numbers show an even sharper rise in the first half of the year, though
the number itself is lower than Central Command first estimated." http://t.uani.com/2c81y6H
Business
Risk
AFP: "France's environment minister
signed Sunday a plan for French firms to help tackle Iran's environmental
problems, but criticised the refusal of her country's banks to work with
the Islamic republic. Segolene Royal met in Tehran with the head of
Iran's Environmental Protection Organisation, Massoumeh Ebtekar, and a
group of ministers, agreeing to work together on the water shortage,
energy efficiency and pollution problems facing Iran. She was travelling
for three days with senior business figures from French environmental and
renewable energy firms, including the boss of multinational Engie. But
both sides are aware that the refusal of major French banks to work in
Iran is a huge obstacle to working together. 'It's a real problem. It's
been raised by the Iranian ministers but also by French businesses,' she
told reporters in Tehran. 'It's completely unacceptable. We can't ask
Iran to make efforts on energy transition... while the financial system
doesn't respond, including on industrial cooperation that could help deal
with energy, climate and pollution issues,' she said... Royal said she
would urgently look for a work-around, even if it meant looking outside
France, for instance to smaller Italian banks that are less exposed to
the US system. 'We will find a solution. Either we will work with
non-French banks... or we will mobilise the public investment bank, or
why not the European Investment Bank?' she said." http://t.uani.com/2bwAXye
LAT: "In June, Iran announced that
it had reached a $25-billion agreement to purchase or lease more than 100
aircraft from Chicago-based Boeing - the biggest U.S. business deal with
Iran since Washington cut diplomatic ties with Tehran in 1979. But
Republican opponents of the nuclear deal in the House of Representatives
approved legislation in July to block the sale. In a letter to Boeing,
two Republican lawmakers cited accusations that Iran's commercial
aviation sector has been used to funnel troops and weapons to terrorist
organizations and dictators such as Syrian President Bashar Assad. 'These
terrorist groups and rogue regimes have American blood on their hands,'
the letter said. 'Your potential customers do as well.' Although
President Obama has said he would veto any attempt to stop the sale, in
the heat of an election campaign in which Republicans are eager to paint
Democrats as soft on Iran, it seems unlikely that any planes will be
delivered before November. Boeing representatives continue to travel to
Tehran for meetings with Iranian aviation officials, most recently in
early August at the former Sheraton hotel. Iranian officials say they
have an agreement in principle, but cite the delay as evidence that the
U.S. isn't living up to its end of the nuclear pact. Some analysts say
Iran can't afford the planes and lacks the technicians and airport space
to operate them. Patrick Clawson, director of research at the Washington
Institute for Near East Policy, wrote last month that the more than 100
Boeing aircraft, plus a similar number Iran wants to purchase from
Airbus, together exceed the entire fleet of Air France - which operates
in a country that has seven times the number of air travelers as
Iran." http://t.uani.com/2bxEdiY
Al-Monitor: "Before the July 2015 nuclear
deal, most banking and finance headlines about Iran concerned individuals
or banks being fined or coming under investigation for allegedly
violating US sanctions. These days, news of banks and financial
institutions working with Iran no longer necessarily raise eyebrows.
However, an Iranian minister's recent inference that MasterCard services
will become available to Iranians has caused a stir. On Aug. 13, several
Iranian media outlets quoted Minister of Communication and Information
Technology Mahmoud Vaezi as saying that Iran Post Company has signed a
deal with a foreign firm to make MasterCard services accessible to
Iranians for the first time. 'Credit and debit cards, accepted in more
than 210 countries where MasterCard is valid, will be distributed at
financial branches of Iran Post Company from Aug. 23, which coincides
with the beginning of Government Week,' Vaezi said. The news quickly made
headlines around the world - but there have been doubts about its
accuracy. MasterCard itself quickly reacted by denying any activity or
cooperation with Iran. 'MasterCard does not have any activities in Iran,
as sanctions have remained in place for US-based companies for some
time,' the company's spokesman Seth Eisen said Aug. 15. While the
reported announcement by the Iranian minister and later denial of
cooperation by MasterCard resulted in wide speculation in the Iranian
media, Vaezi later tried to clarify what he described as a
'misunderstanding' about his remarks... Based on statements by Iranian
officials, it appears that the Malaysia-registered Vision Card Iranian
Co. will roll out a debit card service. According to the company's
website, it is the official representative of TransForex - an official prepaid
issuer of MasterCard - in Iran." http://t.uani.com/2c26xGZ
Sanctions
Relief
Press TV
(Iran): "Russian
shipbuilder Krasnye Barrikady and an Iranian company have signed a deal
worth $1 billion to build five offshore drilling rigs for oil and gas
exploration in the Persian Gulf. The deal signed with Iran's Tasdid
Offshore Development Company (TODC) on Sunday envisages the construction
of each drilling rig over two years in the port city of Khorramshahr,
TODC Managing Director Ehsanollah Mousavi said. The project will be
jointly financed by Russia and Iran, and put the Islamic Republic among
the countries capable of building drilling rigs... Mousavi signed the
agreement with Krasnye Barrikady CEO Alexander Ilyichev, lending a fresh
momentum to Iran's oil and gas development, including its massive South
Pars field." http://t.uani.com/2bM79yA
Regional
Destabilization
VOA: "The Iranian government's
launch of a 'United Shia Liberation Army' is sending signals that Tehran
wants to expand its political and military role in Middle East conflicts
along sectarian lines, analysts say. 'Using a sectarian Shi'ite
identifier with the title of the new army will inflame sectarian tensions
in the region,' Talha Abdulrazaq, a researcher at the University of
Exeter's Strategy and Security Institute, told VOA. 'Iran is asserting
itself as a regional or even an imperialistic power.' The new force,
announced Thursday by a veteran military commander who leads Iranian
forces in Syria, is designed to fight in Arab countries and would recruit
heavily from non-Iranian Shi'ite Muslims across the region. In an
interview with Mashregh news agency, Mohammad Ali Falaki, a leader in the
elite Iranian Revolutionary Guard's (IRGC), said the focus of the new
force would center on three fronts - Yemen, Syria and Iraq. He said the
IRGC already leads Shi'ite dominated forces in Syria comprising fighters
who come from Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon... 'It is an announcement
that they are basically declaring that they are going to continue to use foreign
fighters to spread sectarian violence, extremism and terrorism across the
region,' Abdulrazaq told VOA in a phone interview." http://t.uani.com/2c7ZtaS
Human
Rights
USA
Today:
"Authorities in Iran have released a Texas graduate student from
jail after five years, state media reported Tuesday. The government-owned
IRAN Daily quoted Omid Kokabee's lawyer as saying his client will be
allowed to enjoy 'conditional freedom' for the rest of his 10-year
sentence, according to the Associated Press. The lawyer, Saeed Khalili,
said Kokabee, who was released from jail in April for medical treatment,
'will not return to prison, any more,' the news agency said. Kokabee, an
Iranian, studied optics in the physics department at the University of
Texas. He was arrested in 2011 while visiting his family and convicted of
having 'relations with a hostile country' and receiving 'illegitimate
funds,' the AP said. The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran
said Kokabee, 34, was jailed for refusing to work on military projects in
Iran and was diagnosed with kidney cancer in April after being denied
proper medical treatment in prison." http://t.uani.com/2bT2Xiu
ICHRI: "Imprisoned Iranian scientist
Omid Kokabee, who spent more than five years in Evin Prison for refusing
to work on Iran's military projects, was granted conditional release on
August 29, 2016. Kokabee, currently on medical leave, was diagnosed with
kidney cancer this past April after years of being denied proper medical
treatment by prison authorities. The International Campaign for Human
Rights in Iran calls on the Iranian Judiciary to immediately allow
Kokabee to leave the country if he so wishes, so that he may continue his
interrupted scientific studies and career. Kokabee's academic studies as
a post-doctoral physics student at the University of Texas were abruptly
halted when he was arrested in Iran in 2011 during a visit to his family.
'While we welcome the decision to release Omid Kokabee after he unjustly
spent more than five years in prison, his release does not compensate for
the pain he endured during these years and the severely damaged health he
suffered as a result of prison conditions,' said Hadi Ghaemi, executive
director of the Campaign." http://t.uani.com/2corIXd
CBC: "A professor from Montreal who
has been imprisoned in Iran was recently hospitalized and is barely
conscious and can hardly walk or talk, according to family. Homa Hoodfar,
an anthropologist at Concordia University, is being kept in solitary
confinement nearly three months after her arrest in Tehran on June 6
while on a personal and research visit to Iran, her niece Amanda
Ghahremani said. Hoodfar's family says Iranian authorities have refused
regular visits by her lawyer and have tried to dismiss him. During his
one visit in July, he was forbidden to discuss her case and has been
denied all access to her legal file, the family said. 'It has become
clear that the authorities are not prioritizing her health and do not
intend to respect Homa's due process rights under Iranian law,'
Ghahremani said... 'The continued solitary incarceration and illegal
psychological pressure applied by the presiding judge to break her and
confess to these fabricated charges are of great concern to Professor
Hoodfar's family and friends,' a news release from the family says."
http://t.uani.com/2bOZqEB
Opinion
& Analysis
Omar S.
Bashir & Eric Lorber in Foreign Affairs: "Last week, representatives
from Boeing visited Tehran to hammer out the details of a proposed
multibillion-dollar sale of commercial aircraft to Iran. The possible
sale of these planes has sparked fierce debate in the U.S. Congress, with
many on both sides of the aisle rightly concerned that the Iranian
government and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) may use these
planes to send arms and illicit goods to Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad's forces or to the international terrorist group Hezbollah. With
the Senate prepared in the next few weeks to consider legislation on this
topic and the Treasury Department poised to provide Boeing (as well as
Airbus, which reached its own deal with Iran earlier this year) the
necessary permission to proceed with the sale, the fight appears headed
for a second round. Critics of Boeing's and Airbus' sales are justifiably
focused on the risks: in 2011, the U.S. Treasury added Iran Air, the
proposed recipient of the aircraft, to the Specially Designated Nationals
list because of its work on behalf of the IRGC. (The list identifies
organizations and individuals that the U.S. government believes are
involved in terrorism.) Although the airline was delisted as part of last
summer's nuclear deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
(JCPOA), Iran Air planes have been implicated in sanctions evasion and
have flown known weapons resupply routes to Syria as recently as June.
Nevertheless, the United States appears to be obligated to allow the sale
of these aircraft to Iran under certain conditions. Annex 2 of the JCPOA,
which identifies key concessions the United States and its partners
agreed to grant Iran in exchange for limits on the Islamic Republic's
nuclear program, specifies that 'the United States commits to allow for
the sale of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services
to Iran . . . provided that licensed items and services are used
exclusively for commercial passenger aviation.' But even if the United
States is obligated to allow the sale of Boeing and Airbus planes to
Iran, the United States does not need to give up its leverage in ensuring
that the aircraft are used exclusively for civilian purposes. By
carefully thinking through how to structure these contracts, the United
States can pressure Iran Air to abstain from using the new aircraft to
support the IRGC and also limit the Islamic Republic's ability to use the
tens of billions of dollars it can now access under the terms of the
JCPOA to support terrorism. In particular, Boeing and Airbus could
require that Iran Air place the bulk of the funds necessary to purchase
these planes in escrow accounts at the beginning of the contract periods.
For example, Boeing could require Iran Air to put $10 billion of the
$17.8 billion deal into an escrow account up-front. The contracts could
further specify that if an independent investigatory or intelligence
service determines that Iran Air is engaged in transporting any military
goods; supporting the IRGC; leasing aircraft to airlines, such as Mahan Air,
that are still on the Specially Designated Nationals list; or flying
these particular aircraft to specific prohibited locations, such as
Damascus, Iran Air will immediately forfeit those funds and the remainder
of the contracts will be nullified-including maintenance services and the
delivery of additional aircraft. The scope of these provisions could also
be expanded to ensure that Iran Air or other Iranian airlines using these
planes not fly to other sanctioned jurisdictions; Iran has well-documented
illicit networks stretching as far as countries such as North Korea. By
requiring up-front payment and making the provision of the aircraft
contingent on Iran Air's agreement to verifiably use them solely for
commercial purposes, these contracts could help allay a major concern
about the nuclear deal among its supporters and critics alike: that the
billions of dollars of relief provided to Iran in the deal is
front-loaded instead of being gradually doled out as long as Iran proves
that it is abiding by the terms of the agreement... This approach would
represent a larger shift to thinking more carefully about how the United
States can unwind sanctions in a targeted way to achieve strategic goals.
And if the Iranians will not agree to such provisions, then the sale of
these aircraft looks even riskier and the regime more recalcitrant."
http://t.uani.com/2byRV47
Emanuele
Ottolenghi in The Hill: "With the presidential campaign in full swing, U.S.
media may be forgiven for downplaying the news of Iranian Foreign
Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif's six-nation tour of Latin America last
week. His visit, however, should elicit concern in Washington. Iran has
long relied on Latin America to evade Western sanctions, including,
critically, on ballistic missiles technology. Now sanctions are gone and
Iran's missile activity no longer banned, but Tehran continues to use
America's backyard to develop long-range missiles capable of carrying
nuclear warheads. Earlier this month, the Brazilian journalist Leonardo
Coutinho confirmed the strategic importance of Latin America to Iran's
military program in the magazine La Veja. Coutinho exposed an official
document dated Aug. 3, 2009, showing that then-Venezuelan President Hugo
Chávez had approved a $1.3-million investment for a joint venture between
Venezuela's state defense contractor, CAVIM, and Iran's Parchin Chemical
Industries. The project involved the establishment and improvement of facilities
for producing nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine, both key components of
solid rocket fuel. Cooperation between Iran and Venezuela's military
sectors has been well-known for years, but it was the first time an
official document has emerged showing Chávez's approval of joint military
industrial projects. The sum is trivial, but the timing and the
partnerships are of critical importance. Iran's missile program came
under intense international pressure after the U.N. Security Council
passed two resolutions (1696 and 1737) in 2006, enacting sanctions
against Iran's procurement efforts. Specifically, Resolution 1737 named
Parchin Chemical Industries as a key player in Tehran's ballistic missile
program. European Union and U.S. sanctions passed in 2007 and 2008
targeted Parchin Chemical Industries as well, and sought to freeze its
assets and block its financial transactions. The approval of funds came
less than a year after the U.S. Treasury targeted the Iranian company,
making it difficult to procure technology and materials, let alone pay
for them. By establishing facilities in a foreign country where Iran was
already intent on creating joint commercial and banking ventures, Parchin
found a gateway to evade sanctions. Eventually, the U.S. Department of State
sanctioned CAVIM in 2013 for this and other joint Iran-Venezuela
projects, but by then, Iran had had four quiet years to advance its solid
rocket-fuel production. The La Veja scoop is thus a reminder of the
objectives that underlie Zarif's Latin America charm campaign. These are
the types of investment, after all, that Iran made in Latin America in
the last decade, building on the strength of an ideological alliance with
like-minded regimes that share the Islamic Republic's
anti-Americanism." http://t.uani.com/2bP9jAw
|
|
Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com
United Against Nuclear
Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a
commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a
regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an
issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own
interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of
nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment