What's
So Un-Islamic About ISIS?
by Ayman S. Ibrahim
American Thinker
August 23, 2016
|
|
Share:
|
Be the first of
your friends to like this.
In each horrifying
operation executed by ISIS, the radical terrorist group uses every
possible way to convey its Islamic identity. They make sure the world
sees and hears what they believe and seek, emphasizing plainly their
religious motivation.
However, in each of these instances, we immediately, and almost
automatically, hear some Western "scholars" insist that everything
about ISIS is un-Islamic: ISIS reflects
"societal ills, not Islamic doctrine," as it "hijacks
religion in order to legitimate, mobilize and recruit." We also hear
that ISIS's version of Islam "is not in accordance with the Quran,
the traditions of the Prophet or even with Islamic Law," and that
"No religion, including Islam, preaches indiscriminate violence
against innocents."
This is puzzling. But, no, it should not be.
When some Western scholars deny that ISIS is "in any way"
driven by rigorous Islamic ideology, this could hardly be attested,
especially if you consider
the insistence of prestigious Islamic institutes, like Egypt's
al-Azhar, on identifying the members of ISIS as true Muslims who are
committing wrong deeds. For al-Azhar, ISIS's members cannot be identified
as unbelievers as long as they do not reject Allah's strict monotheism
and the apostleship of Muhammad.
Contrary to arguments set forth by these Western scholars, ISIS
reflects a specific interpretation of Islam that is both legitimate and
consistent with Muslim sacred texts and classical exegesis. Claiming that
ISIS's members are lunatics driven by lust or social evil is hardly
plausible, and at best fanciful. Its members can establish rigorous
convincing arguments based on the Quran and Islamic tradition to justify
each action they take, as they affirm:
"This is a fight against Muslims and Islam." They rely on what
Muslims consider divinely inspired and authoritative texts. Ideology
establishes convictions and drives behavior.
While there are, of course, various political, sociological, and
economic dimensions of the ISIS identity that make its radical image
appealing, the religious appeal is exceptionally powerful and unmatched.
For ISIS, the centrality of the Quran and the veneration of the
Prophet Muhammad are of utmost importance, and they believe they are
destined by Allah to win because of their "noble" cause. This
is clearly reflected in ISIS's black flag that contains the presumed sign
of Muhammad's seal and the Islamic Shahada ("there is no god
but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger").
ISIS portrays itself as not only Islamic, but more precisely, Quranic.
They perceive their actions as truly sanctioned and legitimately supported
by Islam's scripture.
A Canadian member of ISIS, Farah Mohamed Shirdon (aka Abu Usama),
appeared on a VICE News interview.
When asked who recruited him to ISIS, Shirdon stated: "no one
recruited me, actually no one spoke or said a word to me, all I did I
opened the newspaper, I read the Quran -- very easy." Shirdon joined
the "Islamic caliphate" over a year ago and in a different
video, he ripped
up his Canadian passport, throwing it into a burning fire as he
shouted: "This is a message to Canada and all the American tyrants:
We are coming and we will destroy you, with permission from Allah the
almighty."
To encourage Muslim enthusiasts to participate in militant operations
and thus get admitted to paradise, ISIS recites Quran 47:15, according to
their official electronic magazine, Dabiq. To justify beheading,
mutilating, and crucifying their enemies, ISIS uses a literal reading of
verses such as Quran 5:33, 8:12, and 47:3-6. They believe that, according
to Quran 8:12, Allah himself "will cast terror" into the hearts
of the unbelievers, so the believers would "strike their necks, and
strike each of their fingertips." In ISIS's view, the Quran is what
constitutes their actions and that makes their message successful in
reaching the hearts of many.
Not only the Quran, but also Islamic history and its significant
precedents back their supposed legitimate cause.
Muslims view the early years of Islam not only as history, but
specifically as a sacred narrative of the greatest prophet and his pious
companions. The "precedent" is very important in Islam, as the
early figures are often viewed as role models to follow. ISIS knows
Islamic history very well, believes it wholeheartedly, and precisely
emphasizes specific historical incidents to justify their deeds and
ideology.
To support their treatment of prisoners of war or expelling the
non-Muslims from their lands, ISIS would quote well-known stories in the Biography
of Muhammad of expelling the Jews from the land or beheading several
hundred of them after they were accused of being traitors. To justify
burning people alive, they refer to authenticated historical reports from
his life and those Caliphs after him. While these stories could be
interpreted in many different ways, ISIS follows and imitates what the
prophet said and did by the letter. This is precisely the way the radical
group wants to depict itself. In an interview
with an ISIS recruit, Khadija, a female who changed her name for
security reasons, was asked why she joined ISIS. "We are going to
properly implement Islam," she was promised by her recruiter.
So, what is really un-Islamic about ISIS?
It appears that one un-Islamic matter about ISIS is the fanciful
Western discourse that represents the Islamic terrorist group as
completely un-Islamic. With the increased public profile of Islam, some
Western scholars simply avoid assessing precise elements of Islamic
ideology that drive and support the deeds of religious enthusiasts.
However, this is unneeded obfuscation, and it should end, so that we
better explain to policy makers, diplomats, and the public the
significance of ancient sacred texts and acclaimed precedents on
contemporary actions.
As Muslims look back and yearn for the golden days of Islam, ISIS
provides a dream fulfilment for some. For the first time in centuries,
Muslims from many ethnicities and cultural backgrounds are called to be
united, apply literally what the Quran teaches, and imitate the deeds
reported in Muslim history about "pious" religious figures.
Ayman S. Ibrahim is Bill and Connie Jenkins Chair and Assistant
Professor of Islamic Studies, Senior Fellow of the Jenkins Center for the
Christian Understanding of Islam at the Southern Baptist Theological
Seminary, and a post-doctoral candidate (2nd PhD) of Middle
Eastern History, Haifa University. This essay was sponsored by Campus Watch, a project
of the Middle
East Forum.
This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an
integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its
author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
Related Items
|
No comments:
Post a Comment