chat
244
comments
Armenian
Christian civilians, escorted by armed Ottoman Muslim soldiers, are
marched through Harput (known as Kharpert by Armenians, the kaza of the
Mamuret-ul Aziz), to a prison in the nearby Mezireh (via Wikipedia)
Today,
April 24, marks the “Great Crime,” that is, the genocide of
Christians—mostly Armenians but also Assyrians—that took place under the
Islamic Ottoman Empire throughout World War I. Then, the Turks
liquidated approximately 1.5 million Armenians and 300,000 Assyrians.
Most objective American historians who have studied the question unequivocally agree that it was a deliberate, calculated genocide:
More than one million Armenians perished as the result of execution, starvation, disease, the harsh environment, and physical abuse. A people who lived in eastern Turkey for nearly 3,000 years [more than double the amount of time the invading Islamic Turks had occupied Anatolia, now known as “Turkey”] lost its homeland and was profoundly decimated in the first large-scale genocide of the twentieth century. At the beginning of 1915 there were some two million Armenians within Turkey; today there are fewer than 60,000…. Despite the vast amount of evidence that points to the historical reality of the Armenian Genocide, eyewitness accounts, official archives, photographic evidence, the reports of diplomats, and the testimony of survivors, denial of the Armenian Genocide by successive regimes in Turkey has gone on from 1915 to the present.
Similarly, in 1920, U.S. Senate Resolution 359 heard testimony that
included evidence of “[m]utilation, violation, torture, and death
[which] have left their haunting memories in a hundred beautiful
Armenian valleys, and the traveler in that region is seldom free from
the evidence of this most colossal crime of all the ages.”
In her memoir, Ravished Armenia, Aurora Mardiganian described being raped and thrown into a harem (consistent with Islam’s rules of war).
Unlike thousands of other Armenian girls who were discarded after being
defiled, she managed to escape. In the city of Malatia, she saw 16 Christian girls crucified:
“Each girl had been nailed alive upon her cross,” she wrote, “spikes
through her feet and hands, only their hair blown by the wind, covered
their bodies.” Such scenes were portrayed in the 1919 documentary film Auction of Souls, some of which is based on Mardiganian’s memoirs.
Whereas
the genocide is largely acknowledged in the West, one of its primary if
not fundamental causes is habitually overlooked: religion. The
genocide is usually articulated through a singularly secular paradigm,
one that factors only things that are intelligible from a secular,
Western point of view—such as identity and gender politics, nationalism,
and territorial disputes. Such an approach does little more than
project modern Western perspectives onto vastly different civilizations
and eras.
War, of course, is
another factor that clouds the true face of the genocide. Because
these atrocities mostly occurred during World War I, so the argument
goes, they are ultimately a reflection of just that—war, in all
its chaos and destruction, and nothing more. But as Winston Churchill,
who described the massacres as an “administrative holocaust,” correctly
observed, “The opportunity [WWI] presented itself for clearing Turkish
soil of a Christian race.” Even Adolf Hitler had pointed out that
“Turkey is taking advantage of the war in order to thoroughly liquidate
its internal foes, i.e., the indigenous Christians, without being
thereby disturbed by foreign intervention.”
It’s worth noting that little has changed; in the context of war in Iraq, Syria, and Libya, the first to be targeted for genocide have been Christians and other minorities.
But
even the most cited factor of the Armenian Genocide, “ethnic identity
conflict,” while legitimate, must be understood in light of the fact
that, historically, religion accounted more for a person’s identity than
language or heritage. This is daily demonstrated throughout the
Islamic world today, where Muslim governments and Muslim mobs persecute
Christian minorities who share the same race, ethnicity, language, and
culture; minorities who are indistinguishable from the majority—except,
of course, for being non-Muslims, or “infidels.”
As one Armenian studies professor asks,
“If it [the Armenian Genocide] was a feud between Turks and Armenians,
what explains the genocide carried out by Turkey against the Christian
Assyrians at the same time?”
Indeed, according to a 2017 book, Year of the Sword: The Assyrian Christian Genocide:
[The] policy of ethnic cleansing was stirred up by pan-Islamism and religious fanaticism. Christians were considered infidels ( kafir). The call to Jihad, decreed on 29 November 1914 and instigated and orchestrated for political ends, was part of the plan” to “combine and sweep over the lands of Christians and to exterminate them.” As with the Armenians, eyewitness accounts tell of the sadistic eye-gouging of Assyrians and the gang rape of their children on church altars. According to key documents, all this was part of “an Ottoman plan to exterminate Turkey’s Christians.
To
understand how the historic genocide of Armenians and Assyrians is
representative of the modern-day plight of Christians under Islam, one
need only read the following words written in
1918 by President Theodore Roosevelt; however, read “Armenian” as
“Christian” and “Turkish” as “Islamic,” as supplied in brackets:
the Armenian [Christian] massacre was the greatest crime of the war, and the failure to act against Turkey [the Islamic world] is to condone it… the failure to deal radically with the Turkish [Islamic] horror means that all talk of guaranteeing the future peace of the world is mischievous nonsense.
Indeed, if we “fail to deal radically” with the “horror” currently being visited upon millions of Christians around the Islamic world—which in some areas reached genocidal proportions—we “condone it” and had better cease talking “mischievous nonsense” of a utopian world of peace and tolerance.
Put
differently, silence is always the ally of those who would liquidate
the “other.” In 1915, Adolf Hitler rationalized his genocidal plans,
which he implemented some three decades later, when he rhetorically
asked: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the
Armenians?”
And who among
today’s major politicians speaks—let alone does anything—about the
ongoing annihilation of Christians by Muslims, most recently (but not
singularly) seen in the Easter Sunday church bombings of Sri Lanka that
left over 300 dead?
Note: See author's recent book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West,
for more on Turks and Armenians — including how the first "genocide" of
Armenians at the hands of Turks actually began one-thousand years ago,
in the year 1019.
Posts
