 |
||||
|
Join
Daniel Pipes in Cyprus in October 2013. For more information, click here.
|
||||
|
Please take a moment to visit
and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your
area.
Dear Reader:
I appeared on April 15 on
Canada's Sun TV, discussing "Should the West Be Supporting Syria's
Assad?" To view the segment, click here
Yours
sincerely,
Daniel
Pipes
"U.S. Fears Syria Rebel Victory, for Now"
  Be the first of your friends to like this.Fine. But the Wall Street Journal today reports in "U.S. Fears Syria Rebel Victory, for Now" by Julian Barnes that the Obama administration is in fact following my counsel. To start with, the U.S. government fears "an outright rebel military victory": Senior Obama administration officials have caught some lawmakers and allies by surprise in recent weeks with an amended approach to Syria: They don't want an outright rebel military victory right now because they believe, in the words of one senior official, that the "good guys" may not come out on top. Of course, fearing a rebel victory gets in the way of ousting the current regime, its goal, leading to a self-contradictory muddle: This assessment complicates the White House's long-standing push to see President Assad step from power. It also puts a spotlight on the U.S.'s cautious approach to helping the opposition, much to the frustration of U.S. allies including France and the U.K., which want to arm Syria's moderate rebels. The result of this shift, these officials say, is the U.S. has sought a controlled increase in support to moderate rebel factions. … "We all want Assad to fall tomorrow, but a wholesale institutional turnover overnight doesn't make a whole lot of sense," a senior U.S. official said. "The end game requires a very careful calibration that doesn't tip the meter in an unintended way toward groups that could produce the kind of post-Assad Syria that we aren't looking for." Trouble is, Washington is attempting to thread a needle that it lacks the finesse to achieve: Administration officials fear that with Islamists tied to al Qaeda increasingly dominating the opposition to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, too swift a rebel victory would undercut hopes for finding a diplomatic solution, according to current and former officials. It would also shatter national institutions along with what remains of civil order, these people say, increasing the danger that Syrian chemical weapons will be used or transferred to terrorists. … Officials say it will require delicate maneuvering to restrain the influence of radicals while buying time to strengthen moderate rebels who Western governments hope will assume national leadership if Mr. Assad can be persuaded to leave. … By strengthening moderates, the U.S. wants to put pressure on Assad supporters to cut a deal that would preserve governing institutions. … Comments: (1) Obviously, I am pleased to learn that the Obama administration quietly has a adopted a sensible policy toward Syria. (2) Let's hope that its unrealistic plan to guide the "good guys" to rule the country will fade with added experience; and that it will instead follow a balance-of-power approach such as I advocate. (April 17, 2013) |
||||
|
To subscribe to this list, go to http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php
Sign up for related (but non-duplicating)
e-mail services:
Middle East Forum (articles and event reports) Campus Watch (articles, blog posts) Islamist Watch (articles, blog posts) Legal Project (articles, blog posts) at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php |
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment