Monday, August 1, 2016

Eye on Iran: Khamenei: Average Iranian Not Benefiting from Nuclear Deal






Join UANI  
  FacebookFollow Us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
 

Top Stories   

AP: "Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says that average Iranians have not seen any benefit from the nuclear deal with world powers... saying: 'Weren't the supposed sanctions lifted to change the life of the people? Is any tangible effect seen in people's life after six months?' Khamenei, who has final say on all state matters, said the U.S. has continued to thwart Iran's economic relations with other countries despite the landmark accord. He said Tehran will not accept any further talks with Washington due to what he described as U.S. violations of the deal, though he's previously ruled out further negotiations in other speeches." http://t.uani.com/2aoWEzH

Bloomberg: "Iran is expected to approve a new model for oil contracts on Wednesday, as part of a push to attract billions of dollars of foreign investment to help rebuild its energy industry... Iran has been working on the oil contract model for the past two years. The Persian Gulf country hopes foreign companies will invest as much as $50 billion a year in its oil sector. Major European oil companies such as Italy's Eni SpA and France's Total SA have expressed an interest in developing Iran's oil and gas fields. 'We'll be into next year before we see any significant activity on the ground,, said Robin Mills, chief executive officer of Dubai-based consultant Qamar Energy. 'For a tender you really want three bidders at least per project and I'm not sure they have a competitive enough situation.' Details to look out for in the contract include legal clauses related to halting work if sanctions are re-imposed and taxes, Mills said." http://t.uani.com/2aoJ6ur

Reuters: "Britain's vote to leave the European Union and the rise of U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump have paralyzed efforts by Western governments to encourage already highly reluctant international banks to do business with Iran. Uncertainty is frustrating Tehran's push for foreign investment to revive its struggling economy: over Britain's political and economic future, over whether Trump - who wants to scrap a nuclear deal with Iran - will get into the White House, and over whether banks will fall foul of U.S. sanctions if they process transactions with the Islamic Republic... Many large banks also fear breaking the remaining U.S. restrictions on Iran, including on dealing with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) - a military force that has extensive business interests including through front companies."http://t.uani.com/2all7Gg

Business Risk

Arne Mielken in Compliance Week: "For those compliance officers watching Iran closely, and especially within companies considering doing business with Iran, what does all of this mean?... [U]ncertainty-which is probably the worst enemy of business-still remains. Even though a broad range of sanctions has been lifted, an important part is still in force... While these primary sanctions do not prevent banks outside the United States from processing transactions in other currencies, the reality is that most banks are deeply concerned that they may unwittingly breach U.S. sanctions and face huge fines. Every bank has still in mind the case of BNP Paribas, sentenced to a $9 billion fine for having financed transactions with Iranian entities in U.S. dollars. As most major banks have activities in the United States and employ U.S. citizens, they have to be very careful in their transactions with Iranian parties. Many currently feel the benefits are not worth the risks. Thus, they tend to reject trade finance deals with Iranian connections out of fear of breaching U.S. sanctions, even if these deals are in non-U.S. currency. Companies and banks are also worried that the view of the U.S. Treasury Department could be different from the view of American prosecutors and financial regulators... Difficulties remain on the Iranian side as well. Iranian enterprises struggle to make payments to companies abroad due to the reluctance of many banks to deal with Iranian banks. The Iranian banking system is outdated, much less regulated and much less transparent than its Western counterparts. Iranian banks are weighed down by an accumulation of bad debts, mainly as a result of investments in real estate that went sour after the tightening of sanctions in 2011-2012 and the end to the oil boom. Useful banking tools, such as stress tests, stimulus packages, and quantitative easing cannot be used by the Iranian banking system to restore solvency. Several Iranian entities remain on the sanction lists of the UNSC, the EU, or the United States. It is strictly forbidden, or there are serious restrictions, to deal with these listed persons and companies. A famous example is the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of Iran's armed forces with extensive commercial and banking activities. It is often rather difficult to ascertain who the owner of a given Iranian company is... Moreover, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) still considers Iran a country that supports terrorism. Therefore, financial institutions have to pay special attention to business relationships and transactions with Iranian companies to avoid being accused of money laundering or breaching anti-terrorism laws. The willingness of the Iranian government to abide by its commitments under the JCPOA is also uncertain... it appears that there is still a chance that sanctions will apply to contracts signed prior to "snap back"... While it is true that many of the sanctions imposed by the EU and United States have been lifted, significant U.S. sanctions still remain in place. And US sanctions are characterized by a lack of clarity. This constrains a safe conduct of business. It should also be remembered that other countries, such as Australia, Canada, and Japan still have sanctions against Iran in place. This means that a large-scale return to full trade with Iran is still a long way off. It will take some time before trade with Iran can be conducted safely and smoothly." http://t.uani.com/2aHkbjL

John E. Bradley in National Law Review: "Although touted by the State Department as the 'type of permissible business activity envisioned' by the JCPOA,9 the Boeing-Iran Air deal has not been uniformly welcomed in the United States as a JCPOA success story. Almost as soon as it was announced, the deal was denounced by various think tanks and political leaders who were previously on record as opposing the JCPOA... At this time it remains to be seen whether Congressional blocking efforts will be successful or whether they will survive Presidential veto. However, given the difficult political and legal environment through which the deal must inevitably travel, Boeing will be forced to walk the line between the permissible and impermissible, and the certain and uncertain, even if the deal is eventually approved. For starters, unlike Cuba, Iran remains a State Sponsor of Terrorism in the eyes of the United States government,16 and this fact sticks out like a sore thumb since the designation carries with it enhanced sanctions and controls over dual use items such as commercial aircraft. Optically, it does seem strange that a State Sponsor of Terrorism, such as Iran, should benefit from a favorable licensing policy involving commercial aircraft. Indeed, when asked whether the United States had ever authorized aircraft sales to a State Sponsor of Terrorism, State Department spokesman John Kirby said that he was not aware of any precedent. Second, in the complex alignment of nations, non-state actors, factions and interests in the Middle East, Iran very much remains an adversary of the United States and its allies, principally Israel. Third, the JCPOA left in place all U.S. legal authorities, non-nuclear sanctions, embargoes and export controls involving Iran, other than those specifically addressed by the JCPOA... Accordingly, the Boeing-Iran Air deal will be surrounded on all sides by non-terminated sanctions (as well as any newly imposed sanctions) that will require skillful maneuvering. 
Fourth... any specific license issued in connection with the Boeing-Iran Air deal will include "appropriate conditions to ensure that licensed activities do not involve, and no licensed aircraft, goods or services are re-sold or re-transferred to, any person on [OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals] (the SDN List)... if Iran Air gets caught violating the terms and conditions under which a specific license is issued, the United States could presumably undo the deal by revoking any license previously issued to Boeing; depending on a number of factors, including timing, such action could result in substantial financial jeopardy to Boeing and other U.S. interests." http://t.uani.com/2aWXSnI

Sanctions Relief

Reuters: "The United States said on Friday it would allow foreign airlines to fly U.S.-made aircraft to Iran, providing greater assurance to aviation companies as Iran tries to re-establish trade and business links following the lifting of sanctions. The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control on Friday issued a license allowing U.S.-made planes to have 'temporary sojourn' in Iran, meaning airlines such as Lufthansa, Turkish Airlines, or others flying frequently to Iran are expressly allowed to use U.S.-made planes, or planes with U.S. parts, to fly there... The license issued on Friday has no impact on the proposed Boeing deal... Treasury outlined several conditions for its allowance, including that the planes stay in Iran no longer than 72 hours at a time. It also only covers fixed-wing aircraft rather than aircraft like helicopters. Companies are also not allowed to store spare parts in Iran, among other conditions." http://t.uani.com/2aHbNAC

CNNMoney: "State-run Iran Air signed an agreement to buy 80 Boeing passenger airplanes [in June], the first major deal between a U.S. company and Iran since sanctions were lifted earlier this year. That followed a huge Iran Air deal for 118 aircraft from Boeing (BA)'s European rival Airbus (EADSF) in January. The companies and Iran say discussions about the sales continue. But internal struggles in Iran, a lack of funding, and political opposition in the United States have put the deals in doubt and are likely to limit the size of the sales if they eventually go ahead. The U.S. Treasury has issued a general license for aircraft sales to Iran but still needs to license each individual deal. Republican lawmakers are trying to prevent that from happening... the political opposition leaves only a slim chance that Boeing's memorandum of understanding with Iran can be converted into a firm contract before the U.S. presidential election in November, experts say. Iran will also find it difficult to arrange financing for the deals until the Treasury Department provides more clarity for banks on their dealings with Tehran. U.S. restrictions on banking remain in place, including a ban on transactions in U.S. dollars, and banks are reluctant to finance any deals with Iran until they have a much clearer idea about what they can and cannot do." http://t.uani.com/2aq18qO

Reuters: "Iran's Oil Minister said on Monday the oil market was oversupplied but predicted balance between demand and supply will be restored, Iranian state television reported on Monday... Since a landmark nuclear deal was reached with major powers in 2015 leading to lifting of sanctions, Iran has been planning to raise its crude production to the pre-sanctions level of four million barrels per day (bpd). To regain the production level, Iran has sweetened the terms it offers on oil development contracts to draw the interest of foreign investors. Iran needs $200 billion in foreign money to reach its goal... The launch of Iran's new oil contracts, the Iran Petroleum Contract (IPC) has been postponed several times as hardline rivals of pragmatist President Hassan Rouhani resisted any deal that could end the buy-back system. Iran's top authority Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last month that no new oil and gas contracts for international companies will be awarded without necessary reforms... Oil majors have said they would only go back to Iran if it made major changes to the buy-back contracts of the 1990s, which companies such as France's Total or Italy's Eni ) said made them no money or even incurred losses. Under Iran's buy-back system foreign firms have been banned from booking reserves or taking equity stakes in Iranian companies." http://t.uani.com/2aJxqC0

Reuters: "Tekhnopromexport, part of Russia's state industrial conglomerate Rostec, has become the first Russian company to win a large, firm contract with Iran after the end of Western sanctions on the Islamic Republic, the business daily Kommersant writes... The company will build a thermal power plant with a capacity of 1.4 gigawatts (1.4 billion watts) in the port city of Bandar Abbas in about five years... The project is estimated at 1 billion euros ($1.12 billion) and will be financed through a Russian export loan... Kommersant cites analysts as saying that Tekhnopromexport will find it hard to earn on this project and call it a largely political one... Despite growing political ties between Moscow and Tehran, economic cooperation between the two nations faces snags on a number of fronts, including project financing... Iran insists that Russia issue loans to fund joint projects which include Russian contractors... Reuters has not verified this story and does not vouch for its accuracy." http://t.uani.com/2aJhmzL

Foreign Affairs

Al Monitor: "As the recent coup attempt in Turkey unfolded late on July 15, Iran - and in particular its foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif -was among the first to react. But what is the reason for the immediate Iranian support for Erdogan, despite the serious differences over the region and especially Syria? While the bilateral trade volume has been declining in recent years, the big picture is that economic exchanges have overall expanded since Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP) first came into office... The success of the attempted military coup would have brought about three fundamental problems for Iran. First, it would have created instability in a neighboring country, and particularly triggered insecurity in Turkey's eastern Kurdish region. The latter would have carried the risk of a spillover, potentially causing a crisis within Iran's borders too. Second, for Iran there are no desirable alternatives to the AKP... [none of which] have ever had a good or close relationship with Iran... There is another salient reason for Iran's backing of Erdogan: Prior to the July 15-16 coup attempt, the Turkish president had decided to resume relations with Russia, effectively ending the crisis with Moscow after having apologized to his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, for the shooting down of a Russian warplane on the border with Syria. Given the latter, there has been the perception of the possibility of greater Turkish movement on the Syrian crisis, which could have a major impact since Syria has turned into the primary dispute between Iran and Turkey." http://t.uani.com/2aEZkiu

Regional Destabilization

Washington Examiner: "The head of U.S. military forces in the Middle East said Thursday he has seen no evidence that the Iran nuclear deal has changed Tehran's support for terror networks in the region... [Gen. Joseph] Votel then ran through a series of things Iran has done since the deal was signed one year ago between Iran and six world powers. Those include Iranian fast boats operating near U.S. vessels in the Persian Gulf, the regime's support for Hezbollah in Lebanon, President Bashar Assad in Syria and the Houthi network in Yemen." http://t.uani.com/2aH9DCK

Haaretz: "Iranian media on Sunday denied reports that an Iranian general was hurt in an attack by Israeli or rebel forces while visiting Syria last week. Arab media outlets over the weekend reported that Brig. Gen. Mohammad-Reza Naghdi, the commander of the Basij paramilitary organization, was wounded during a highly publicized visit to southern Syria, near the Israeli border. No Syrian, Iranian or Israeli official has confirmed the reports." http://t.uani.com/2aWYNEI

Saudi-Iran Tensions

Bloomberg: "Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil exporter, lowered the pricing terms for Arab Light crude sold to Asia by the most in 10 months, signaling Saudi Arabia has no plans to back down while OPEC rival Iran tries to regain market share amid a global oversupply. State-owned Saudi Arabian Oil Co. said Sunday it will sell cargoes of Arab Light in September at $1.10 a barrel below Asia's regional benchmark. That is a pricing cut of $1.30 from August, the biggest drop since November, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The company was expected to lower the pricing by $1 a barrel, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of eight refiners and traders. Iran has boosted crude production 25 percent this year and aims to reach an eight-year high for daily output of 4 million barrels by the end of the year. Customers in Asia account for the largest share of Iran's new sales, according to shipping data... Saudi Arabia has responded by boosting its crude and refined products exports. 'The market share battle between them and Iran is back on in a big way,' John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital LLC in New York, said... 'This is a throwdown challenge that I'm sure the Iranians will match.'" http://t.uani.com/2aoKgWK

Domestic Politics

Al Monitor: "Tehran public prosecutor Abbas Jaffar Dowlatabadi sat down with reporters and divulged new information about the corruption cases that have rocked Iran in recent weeks. On the arrests at Bank Mellat, Dowlatabadi said that it was related to the "movement of 800 billion toman" (approximately $258 million at today's exchange rate). Reiterating comments by the judiciary, he added that four people in total have been arrested but a number of other suspects are outside of the country. The Intelligence Organization of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) recently arrested the former managing director of Bank Mellat, Ali Rasteghar Sorkhei, and his deputy. IRGC commander Brig. Gen. Mohammad Ali Jaffari said that Rasteghar Sorkhei was linked to an "organized group of banking corruption"... Jaffari had previously said 'other officials' were involved, though it is not clear how deep into the administration the charges will go. Conservative media have for months been trying to link President Hassan Rouhani's brother and special advisor, Hossein Fereydoun, to various corruption allegations. Just after Rasteghar Sorkhei's removal at Bank Mellat and just before his arrest, Tasnim News Agency wrote that Fereydoun and Rasteghar Sorkhei were long-time friends and his appointment at Bank Mellat was at the urging of Fereydoun." http://t.uani.com/2aX1BSk

Opinion & Analysis

UANI Advisory Board Member Olli Heinonen in FDD: "Iran plans to manufacture and install additional advanced centrifuges at its Natanz facility in about 10 years, substantially boosting the country's uranium-enrichment capability, according to a confidential document leaked last week by the Associated Press... A number of unknowns remain regarding Iran's enrichment capacities. One important factor is the total number of IR-2m centrifuges - not just those dismantled from Natanz but those already manufactured or ready to be assembled and installed. For the international community to prevent an Iranian breakout, more detailed reporting from the IAEA will be indispensable. Unfortunately, since the November 2013 interim agreement and especially since the start of this year, the IAEA has further reduced the amount of qualitative and quantitative information in its reports on Iran. In response, a group of Democratic senators wrote to President Obama earlier this month urging him to make more information available on the status of the JCPOA's implementation. If, as stated, the administration believes the nuclear deal provides an unprecedented level of monitoring and verification of the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, it should favor greater transparency to prove it." http://t.uani.com/2au5zku

UANI Advisory Board Member Olli Heinonen in Tehran Times: "Implementation [of the Iran nuclear deal] has started well, but I see some turbulences during months to come. Therefore, it is essential that the IAEA reporting is more detailed so that the member states can make their independent conclusions on the implementation of the agreement." http://t.uani.com/2aUN21I
       

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment