|
In this mailing:
by Soeren Kern
• February 8, 2017 at 5:00 am
- Critics of
Germany's open-door immigration policy are warning that the recent
surge in Germany's Muslim population — which surpassed six million
in 2016 for the first time — has already changed the face of the
country forever.
- The price for
reversing Germany's demographic decline appears to be the further
Islamization of Germany under the guise of multiculturalism.
- With a
fertility rate of 1.6 births per woman, well below the replacement
rate of 2.1, Germany will require a permanent influx of 300,000
migrants per year in order keep the current population level stable
through the year 2060, according to the report.
- "We are
importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic
conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of
society and law. German security agencies are unable to deal with
these imported security problems, and the resulting reactions from
the German population." — Leaked German intelligence document.
- More than a
decade ago historian Bernard Lewis warned that if current migration
trends continue, Europe will be Islamic by the end of the 21st
century. Germany's political elites are at the vanguard of making
that prediction come true.
Out with the old, in with the new...
Germany will need to take in 300,000 migrants annually for the next
40 years to stop population decline, according to a leaked government
report.
The document, parts of which were published by the Rheinische
Post on February 1, reveals that the German government is counting on
permanent mass migration — presumably from Africa, Asia and the Middle
East — to keep the current size of the German population (82.8 million)
stable through 2060.
The report implies that Chancellor Angela Merkel's decision to allow
into the country some 1.5 million mostly Muslim migrants between 2015 and
2016 was not primarily a humanitarian gesture, but a calculated effort to
stave off Germany's demographic decline and to preserve the future
viability of the German welfare state.
by Thomas Quiggin
• February 8, 2017 at 4:30 am
- A variety of
groups ascribe to the Islamist objective of imposing their
politicized beliefs on others. Included in these are ISIS, al-Qaeda
and Hizb ut-Tahrir. However, the largest and best organized of all
the Islamist groups is the Muslim Brotherhood. It is the well-spring
from which the Islamist ideology flows.
- The founder of
the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan al-Banna, stated that "It is in
the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its
law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire
planet."
- A bill,
introduced by Senator Ted Cruz, to have the Muslim Brotherhood
designated as a terrorist group would have far-reaching impact, and
be the single greatest blow stuck against Islamist extremism in the
USA.
- The Muslim
Brotherhood operating in the U.S. made it clear that "their
work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and
destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its
miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so
that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all
other religions."
- The North
Atlantic Islamic Trust, according to former FBI Agent Robert
Stauffer, "served as a financial holding company for Muslim
Brotherhood-related groups." This money was wired into the U.S.
from countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Egypt,
Malaysia and Libya.
The emblem of the Muslim Brotherhood, and its founder,
Hassan al-Banna.
Muslims living in the United States likely have little to fear from
the Trump Administration and the 115th Congress. By contrast,
Islamists living in the United States have grounds to be worried.
A bill introduced by Senator Ted Cruz to have the Muslim Brotherhood
designated as a terrorist group could have far-reaching implications,
many of which have received little public attention. The bill, if acted
upon, would be the single greatest blow stuck against Islamist extremism
in the USA. It would also have far reaching impact in Canada and
elsewhere.
by Jagdish N. Singh
• February 8, 2017 at 4:00 am
- The Trump
Administration needs to see to it that UN Security Council
Resolution 2334 is rendered null and void.
- UNSC Resolution
2334 also implies that Jerusalem's Jewish Quarter, Western Wall and
Temple Mount are all occupied territory, when in fact, it was Israel
that liberated them from the illegal Jordanian conquest of them in
the war of 1948.
- Given the
history of violence which the Palestinians indulge in against the
Jews, it would seem a counter-productive precedent to reward decades
of terrorism and uncivilised behaviour with a state. It would also
leave the Palestinians, who deserve a responsible and accountable
leadership, under the domination of two corrupt and brutal
governments, the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.
- A study of the
various proposals Israel has made to Palestine from time to time
shows the key obstacle to peace is not the Palestinians' demand for
any piece of land but their refusal to recognize the existence of
the Jewish state, or presumably any state but an Islamic one.
- The U.S. could
also move its embassy to Jerusalem. This would send the Palestinian
leadership and others in the region a strong message that Washington
will support both historical facts and countries that comport
themselves with civilised behaviour.
Nikki Haley (pictured above from 2014), President
Trump's appointment to the United Nations, has already condemned UN
Security Council Resolution 2334 as an "outrageous bias"
against Israel. (Image source: defenseimagery.mil)
In the long-continuing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians,
conventional wisdom has it that peace can be achieved through realistic
negotiations between the parties to the conflict.
The previous Obama administration displayed a clear tilt towards one
party to the conflict, the Palestinians, at the cost of the other,
Israel.
Last month, Washington's abstention from voting on United Nations
Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2334 led to its passage. This
resolution condemns Israeli settlements in "Palestinian Occupied
Territories." Resolution 2334 also implies that Jerusalem's Jewish
Quarter, Western Wall and Temple Mount are all occupied territory, when
in fact, it was Israel that liberated them from the illegal Jordanian
conquest of them in the war of 1948. The resolution effectively states
that any Jewish presence beyond the 1949 armistice lines, or Israeli
construction in Judea, Samaria or Jerusalem, is illegal.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment