|
by Alan M. Dershowitz • April 3, 2019
at 10:00 am
- Julie K. Brown refused
to investigate and/or publish highly credible information that
undercut the simplistic and largely false narrative fed her by her
biased sources. I know, because I have been providing her with
much of the documents and information she chose to bury rather
than report.
- Here is the truthful
narrative Brown refused to report. Every fact can be
documented.... The only problem is that Secret Service and other
records conclusively proved that none of them was ever on that
Island and that the Gores didn't even know Epstein.... Yet her own
employment records prove that she was well above the age of
consent when she claims these liaisons occurred— in the unlikely
event they ever occurred at all.
- A careful review of
these records led Giuffre's own lawyer to conclude — in a lawfully
recorded conversation— that it would have been impossible for me
to have been where she falsely claimed to have had sex with me,
and that his client's accusations against me were
"wrong," "simply wrong."... Even Giuffre's
best friend said that Giuffre told her she had never accused me
until she was "pressured" by her lawyers to do so.
- So shame on Brown. Shame
on the Miami Herald. And shame on the Pulitzer Committee if
it fails to investigate Brown's reporting and encourages such fake
news and shoddy journalism by rewarding it.
(Image source: Vladimir
Babenko/Wikimedia Commons)
Among the leading candidates for a Pulitzer Prize in
investigative journalism is the Miami Herald and its reporter Julie K.
Brown for its series on the Jeffrey Epstein case. The series, however,
was not based on rigorous and objective investigation, but rather on
one sided, and largely false tips from self-interested lawyers who used
the series to their financial advantage. Brown refused to investigate
and/or publish highly credible information that undercut the simplistic
and largely false narrative fed her by her biased sources. I know,
because I have been providing her with much of the documents and
information she chose to bury rather than report. Had she reported this
contradictory material, she would have endangered the Pulitzer Prize
she has been aiming to win. The Pulitzer Committee should not reward
such biased and result oriented "reporting" by giving her the
prize.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment