|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
April 5, 2019
|
|
CAIR
Anti-Semites Fight "Anti-Semitism Awareness" Bill
IPT News
April 5, 2019
|
|
|
Share:
|
Be the
first of your friends to like this.
The Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued an "action alert" on Thursday encouraging its
supporters to pressure Congress to oppose the "Anti-Semitism Awareness
Act of 2019."
The Act was reintroduced in March by U.S. Sen. Tim Scott,
R-S.C., and three other senators. It directs the Department of Education to
adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)'s working
definition of anti-Semitism, which the State Department embraced
in 2016.
Elements of this working definition encompass modern anti-Israel
sentiment that "crosses the line into anti-Semitism." That
includes denying the Jewish people's right to self-determination, claims
that Israel was founded as a racist entity, and applying double standards
against Israel not expected of other democracies.
Numerous governments, including the United Kingdom, Germany, and many
other European states, have embraced and promoted this working definition.
CAIR's alert urged its supporters to "contact their legislators
to oppose the falsely-titled 'Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2019.'"
CAIR is worried that if the U.S. Department of Education adopts this
definition, U.S. Islamist groups will be inhibited in their efforts to
stoke anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses. If enacted, CAIR says, the
bill "would dangerously politicize anti-Semitism by equating it with
legitimate criticism of Israeli policy."
That is simply false. The IHRA working definition specifies that "criticism of Israel similar to
that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic."
But dual loyalty smears and comparisons linking the Jewish state to Nazi Germany can be, along
with "dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about
Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but
not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews
controlling the media, economy, government or other societal
institutions."
CAIR's efforts to derail this bill are not surprising given the
organization's record for spreading anti-Israel views that often transcend
into the realm of anti-Semitism.
CAIR leader Zahra Billoo, for example, acknowledged in November that she is "not going to
legitimize a country [Israel] that I don't believe has a right to
exist." She also has denounced Muslim leaders who oppose the Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.
"I don't think of them as my leaders," Billoo said at a
November gathering with the Ecumenical Peace Institute.
BDS – which seeks to isolate Israel economically and culturally – is
considered anti-Semitic because it singles out the world's only Jewish
state and ignores countries with far worse human rights records.
Billoo, like other U.S. Islamist figures, consistently opposes any type of engagement or
interfaith dialogue with organizations that support Israel.
CAIR leaders from across the country often espouse blatantly
anti-Semitic views. CAIR's Los Angeles chapter Executive Director Hussam
Ayloush has referred to "zionazis" and openly called for Israel's termination, while Florida director
Hassan Shibly refused to condemn Hamas and vilified "Israel [and] its supporters" as the
"enemies of God and humanity."
Billoo has similarly supported Palestinian terrorists attacking Israelis
and openly called
for the destruction of the Jewish state, in a not-so-veiled threat:
"From the river to the sea, #Palestine will be free."
Ayloush and Billoo have repeatedly compared Americans who move to
Israel and join the Israel Defense Forces to ISIS terrorists.
These are the bigoted figures that U.S. Rep Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., counts as her close friends.
These CAIR officials are continuing a long track record of anti-Semitic
statements uttered by their leader: National Executive Director Nihad Awad.
Back in 1998, Awad singled out the Clinton Administration's Jewish
advisers for supposedly opposing an agreement with Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
"Look at their last names. Look at their ethnic, their ethnic or
religious or racial background. You will see that these are the same groups
that belong to the same interest groups in the Administration. These are
the same people who are pushing the United States to go to war on behalf of
a third party, and they are the same people who are opposing the peace
agreement."
The "third party" Awad was referring to is Israel. For Awad
and other U.S.-based Islamists, the Jewish state and the pro-Israel
community in America maintains disproportionate power of over U.S. foreign
policy. This sentiment is another form of anti-Semitism, invoking centuries
old tropes of Jewish control of society.
Awad also believes that the "Zionist movement" solely controls
the film industry and media. "There is no, no, uh, no secret in the
knowledge that filmmakers in Hollywood are of Jewish origin and they have a
big effect," Awad said in Arabic during a 1998 Al Jazeera interview with Yusuf al Qaradawi, the anti-Semitic spiritual head of
the global Muslim Brotherhood.
At a joint Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)-Muslim American
Society (MAS) conference in 2010, Awad claimed that "some of members
of Congress are willing to put the interests of Israel ahead of the United
States' interests." This view is similar to recent comments by U.S.
Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., that levied dual loyalty allegations against American
supporters of Israel. Accusing Jews of holding more allegiance to their
homeland than their host states is a form of anti-Semitism.
"We need to tell our members of Congress that they have pledged
allegiance to the Constitution of the United States, not the State of
Israel," Awad said at a 2014 rally in Washington D.C.
Legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies are important
expressions of free speech, especially in academic settings like college
campuses. But CAIR leaders continue to demonize Israel in a way that is not
conducive to intellectual debate. "From the river to the sea" is
not a criticism of Israeli policy, though. It's a call to eliminate an
existing state. It is flat out anti-Semitism that is meant to intimidate
Jewish students on campuses and stifle any support for Israel's right to
defend itself and exist as a Jewish state.
CAIR's efforts to derail this congressional bill are further proof of
its nefarious objectives.
Related Topics: The
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), anti-Semitism,
Tim
Scott, International
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, dual
loyalty smears, Zahra
Billoo, BDS,
Hussam
Ayloush, Hassan
Shibly, Rashida
Tlaib, Nihad
Awad
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment