Rasmieh
Odeh Prosecution: Justice Demands Extraordinary Sentence
IPT News
February 25, 2015
|
|
|
Share:  
|
  Be the
first of your friends to like this.
 In a memorandum loaded with staggering new disclosures
about her terrorist past, prosecutors are asking a federal judge to
sentence Rasmieh Odeh to at last five years in prison for
naturalization fraud.
Jurors in Detroit convicted
Odeh, 67, in November, finding that she lied on her application to become an American citizen.
She failed to disclose an Israeli conviction for her role in a 1969
Jerusalem supermarket bombing that killed two university students and
claimed to never have been arrested, convicted or imprisoned.
Immigration officials testified
that Odeh never would have been allowed into the country, much less
naturalized as an American citizen, had they known about her terrorist
conviction.
Her sentencing is scheduled for March 12 in Detroit.
The prosecution memo offers evidence challenging Odeh's entire narrative
– that she was unjustly convicted after being tortured by Israeli officials
– and offers new details about the "exalted role" she held within
the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). The group named a
terrorist unit in her honor while she was in Israeli prisons.
The defense, in contrast, repeats the unsubstantiated torture claims and
casts the government's posture as an act of subservience to Israel.
Given her one-count conviction and criminal history in the United
States, sentencing guidelines recommend that Odeh serve 12-18 months in
prison. But the nature of her lie, hiding her direct involvement in a
lethal terrorist attack, means that such a sentence "would grossly
fail to promote respect for the law," Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan
Tukel wrote in a memorandum filed Wednesday.
A relative "slap on the wrist" for Odeh, followed by
deportation after enjoying 20 years of life in America looks like an
attractive exchange for a hypothetical person who fought for ISIS or other
terrorist groups who might try to come here. "Only a significant
sentence, which shows that there is a serious price to pay for committing
such fraud on the U.S. immigration system, will reflect the seriousness of
the offense and provide deterrence to others who may be contemplating such
a move and are weighing the possible costs and the possible gain," the
prosecution memo said.
In their sentencing memorandum, defense attorneys asked
that Odeh be spared any prison time. They repeated her claim that her
Israeli conviction was unjust and the product of a confession brought about
through torture. They call the prosecution's request for a sentence far
above normal guidelines a political maneuver aimed at pleasing "their
American Zionist constituents and obfuscat[ing] 67 years of Israeli
terrorism."
"Now, with the bodies of hundreds of innocents slaughtered in Gaza
in August fresh in the minds of all who bother to care about humanity, the
prosecution here demands a wholly unjustified, draconian sentence, for
illegitimate political purposes, against this woman who has suffered so
much and given so much," the defense sentencing memo said. "The real motivation behind
the prosecution's interest, in seeking a prison sentence well beyond what
is reasonably appropriate under the sentencing factors, is not to deter
others who may lie to obtain admission to the United States, but to raise
the specter of Palestinian terrorism---using this 45 year old case---as a
cover for and distraction from our own Government's billions of dollars of
military and other material support for Israel's remorseless tyrannies
against Palestine and Palestinians."
That argument may not sit well with U.S. District Judge Gershwin A.
Drain, who recently slammed a defense motion for a new trial, which also
was based on previous arguments he had already rejected. In addition, Odeh
and defense attorney Michael Deutsch drew several admonitions from Drain
during the trial when they defied his pre-trial orders and tried to argue
the Israeli conviction was unjust.
Whether it was a valid conviction didn't matter, Drain ruled. Odeh's failure to disclose her record accurately
was the only issue for jurors to consider. After the verdict, Odeh spoke to
supporters and called the outcome "racist."
The defense sentencing motion acknowledges Odeh violated the court's
orders during the trial and that the jury's verdict indicates they think
she lied during her testimony. But that should not be held against her.
Odeh would have faced a maximum of six months in prison had she accepted
a plea offer from the government, Deutsch wrote. Her life in the United
States has been unblemished, and featured "amazingly imaginative,
effective, selfless community organizing she has been engaged in for the
last ten years with [the Arab American Action Network]."
But prosecutors had to prepare evidence to support the Israeli
conviction in case Drain ruled differently before the trial, and they used
some of it to call for a sentence significantly higher than the normal
guidelines.
Odeh initially confessed after just one day in Israeli custody, the memo
said, not after weeks of mistreatment. Taken together, "there can be
no question as to the role Odeh played" in the bombings, the
prosecution memo said.
Among the examples cited are excerpts from a 1994 documentary
sympathetic to Odeh's cause. In those excerpts, she and an accomplice are seen discussing their roles in the 1969 bombing at a
Supersol store in Jerusalem. Two Hebrew University students died in that attack.
The details Odeh and her accomplice described in the film match Odeh's confession to Israeli officials, Tukel
wrote.
In a 1980 article in the Journal of Palestine Studies that remains online, Odeh is quoted discussing her
involvement in a subsequent bombing attempt at the British Consulate in
Jerusalem. "Actually we placed two bombs," she said, "the
first was found before it went off so we placed another."
In a separate documentary, taped two years before Odeh came to America,
archival footage from a 1970 hijacking is shown, with the female PFLP
terrorist identifying her group as "Task Force Rasmieh
Odeh."
Odeh's case triggered a national campaign to pressure prosecutors into
dropping the indictment against her. Dozens of people traveled from
Chicago, where Odeh now lives, to Detroit, to pack the courtroom during the
trial and demonstrate in front of the Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism showed the deceptive nature of that
campaign in a five-part series, "Spinning a Terrorist Into a
Victim," which can be seen starting with Part 1 here.
Odeh's memo taps into that support network with 70 letters from
religious, academic and community representatives. Most cite her claim of
enduring torture as established fact and say her near-certain deportation
would be punishment enough.
Among those who submitted letters are Ahmed
Rehab of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Chicago
office, the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Muslim
Legal Fund of America national Director Khalil Meek, and Jamal Said, imam of Bridgeview's Mosque Foundation.
Related Topics: Prosecutions,
Rasmieh
Odeh, Spinning
a Terrorist Into a Victim, PFLP,
Supersol
bombing, Jonathan
Tukel, Michael
Deutsch, Gershwin
A. Drain, Arab
American Action Network, CAIR,
Ahmed
Rehab, Arab
American Anti-Discrimination Committee, Khalil
Meek, Jamal
Said, Prosecutions
|
Send
RSS
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment