In this mailing:
- Khaled Abu Toameh: How Iran Plans to
Take Gaza
- Oren Litwin: New York City's
Islamist Grant
by
Khaled Abu Toameh • October 9, 2018 at 5:00 am
- The
situation in the Gaza Strip is unlikely to witness any positive
changes. Even if Hamas were to be removed from power, the
Palestinians would continue to suffer under other radical groups
such as Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).
- Even
if Hamas were to wake up tomorrow morning and have an about-face,
striking a genuine truce with Israel, there will always be other
terrorist groups that are prepared to breach the agreement any
time they wish.
- These
are crucial factors that need to be taken into account by any
international party that seeks a solution to the catastrophe
called Gaza. Alternatively, one might to wish to continue to
inhabit some alternate reality in which all be would be well if
Israel would only ease restrictions on the Gaza Strip.
Gaza's second-largest terrorist group
after Hamas is the Iranian-funded Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ),
which has thousands of supporters and militiamen. Pictured: Masked
members of PIJ training in the Gaza Strip. (Photo by Abid Katib/Getty
Images)
If anyone was hoping that removing Hamas from power in
the Gaza Strip would improve the situation there and boost the chances
of peace between Palestinians and Israel, they are in for a big
disappointment. Hamas, which violently seized control over the Gaza
Strip in the summer of 2007, is not the only terrorist group in the
coastal enclave, home to some two million Palestinians.
In addition to Hamas, these are several other
Palestinian terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip.
The second-largest group after Hamas is Palestinian
Islamic Jihad (PIJ), which has thousands of supporters and militiamen.
If and when Hamas is ever removed from power, PIJ has the strongest
chance of stepping in to fill the vacuum.
by
Oren Litwin • October 9, 2018 at 4:00 am
- Alarmingly,
three of New York City's grant recipients are linked to Islamic
extremism -- the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the
Muslim American Society (MAS) and the Islamic Circle of North
America (ICNA).
- It
seems that ICNA, in particular, plans to use the money not for
civic improvement but for religious proselytizing.
- To
pay for prayer services with a government grant is a blatant
violation of constitutional law, and all the more so when it is
for a proselytizing purpose.
- If
New Yorkers want to help Muslim communities, giving money to CAIR,
ICNA and MAS should be the last thing they do.
The New York City Council recently
awarded grants to three groups linked to Islamic extremism: the Council
on American Islamic Relations, the Muslim American Society and the
Islamic Circle of North America. Pictured: New York City Council
Speaker Corey Johnson (right) chats with colleagues at a council
session on January 4, 2018. (Official NYC Council Photo by William
Alatriste)
On August 21, the New York City Council announced
$250,000 in grants made to 14 Muslim community organizations, in
collaboration with the New York Immigration Coalition. Alarmingly,
three of the grant recipients are linked to Islamic extremism -- the
Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim American
Society (MAS) and the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA).
Worse, it seems that ICNA, in particular, plans to use
the money not for civic improvement but for religious proselytizing.
The grant announcement was made at ICNA's headquarters
in Jamaica, Queens, after the jumu'ah prayer service. Present
were the young speaker of the city council, Corey Johnson, and
Councilman Daneek Miller, the sole Muslim member of the council.
Councilman Miller is no stranger to ICNA; his campaign
website prominently features a photo of him speaking at the ICNA
mosque.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment