In this mailing:
- Giulio Meotti: Europe: Muslim
Reformers Need Police Protection
- Vijeta Uniyal: Is Germany Heading to
a "September Surprise"?
by
Giulio Meotti • September 22, 2017 at 5:00 am
- Seyran Ates, a moderate
imam, has received "300 emails per day encouraging me to
carry on," but "3,000 a day full of hate," some
with death threats.
- In Germany, it is not
the Muslim supremacists, such as those who preach killing
homosexuals, who have to live under police protection; it is the
Muslims who criticize the supremacists. The only "crime"
these concerned Muslims committed was to exercise their democratic
right to speak -- not in Iran or Syria or Iraq -- but in Europe.
- These reformers try to
keep alive the values of the Enlightenment -- freedom of speech,
separation of religion and state, equal justice under law -- to
break through the coerced silence of Islam, in which
"blasphemy" is punishable by death. The price, however,
has been exile, torture, ostracism, public marginalization, and
too often life itself. Where are the "moderate Muslims"?
In the Muslim world, they are in prison, in exile, in flight. In
Europe, these genuine "moderate Muslims" have to live
under police protection. Multiculturalism for them is a prison.
Berlin's Seyran Ates, an imam who
preaches a genuinely "moderate Islam", needs around-the-clock
police guards to protect her from fundamentalist Islamists. (Photo by
Sean Gallup/Getty Images)
Abdelbaki Essati, the imam the authorities believe was
at the center of terrorist attacks in and around Barcelona, was
apparently a master of deception -- "too polite, too
correct". He was apparently able to deceive European intelligence
services by preaching a "moderate" version of Islam, while at
the same time, orchestrating deadly jihadist attacks.
Another imam in Europe, Seyran Ates, preaches a
genuinely "moderate Islam" but needs around-the-clock police
protection.
Ates, training to become an imam, seems to have thought
there was no better place than Berlin to inaugurate her mosque, Ibn
Rushd-Goethe. It is the first Islamic religious site open to unmarried
women, homosexuals, atheists, Sufis, unveiled women -- all those people
that many fundamentalist Islamists have said they wish to silence or
kill.
by
Vijeta Uniyal • September 22, 2017 at 4:00 am
- Instead of hurting the
AfD's electoral prospects, the smear campaign has ended up driving
more voters toward the party.
- Questioning the AfD's
legitimacy on judicial and constitutional grounds has a
two-pronged effect. It not only sows doubt in the minds of the
undecided voters, but also scares away state employees, law
enforcement officers, business owners and even law-abiding
citizens from associating themselves with the AfD out of fear of
government scrutiny and reprisals.
- "I am ashamed that
I am not brave enough to support the AfD publicly. But it would be
professional suicide and I will never see my grandchildren
again," confessed
another anonymous German voter.
An AfD campaign poster. Attempts by
the German government and the media to smear the far-right party appear
to be backfiring. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
Stay at home instead of vote for the right-wing party,
Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), is the last-minute advice Chancellor
Merkel's chief of staff, Peter Altmaier, is giving to voters ahead of
Sunday's election in Germany.
"Better not vote than to vote for the AfD,"
Merkel's powerful right-hand man told the German newspaper Bild
on Tuesday. "The AfD are dividing our country. They are exploiting
people's fears. Therefore, I believe that a vote for the AfD cannot be
justified.
"These are just a few rabble-rousers who profit
from all the reporting on them," he continued, urging the media to
stop covering the AfD.
After 12 years of running the country, Chancellor Merkel
and her lieutenant still do not understand real democracy. In a real
democracy, the voters hold the elected representatives accountable, not
the other way around.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment