|
by David C. Stolinsky • September
29, 2018 at 5:00 am
- Kathryn Steinle's
last words were, "Dad, help me, help me." But her
dad could not help her. It was up to us to help her by
keeping the streets as safe as possible. We did not. We used
up all our sympathy on those who do not deserve it, leaving
none for those who do deserve it. We made a "sanctuary
city" that was safe for José Inés García Zárate, but extremely
unsafe for his victim, Kathryn Steinle.
(Image
source: iStock)
There are many reasons that citizens vote for a
candidate. Blue-collar families often vote for the one who will
bring back manufacturing jobs. Military families often vote for the
one who will leave no man behind. For me, public safety is a
primary consideration. People have a finite amount of sympathy. I'm
sure Mother Teresa had more than I do, but even hers was not
unlimited. Wisely, she spent hers for the poor. But many people are
not wise. They spend their sympathy on illegal immigrants and
criminals, leaving none for law-abiding citizens. Take, for
instance, the cases of Sarah McKinley and Kathryn Steinle.
Sarah McKinley was home with her three-month-old son on New Year's
Eve 2013. She lived in the rural community of Blanchard, Oklahoma,
and police response times tended to be long. She was an 18-year-old
widow. Her husband had died of cancer a few days earlier.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment