|
In this mailing:
- Gordon G. Chang: Will North Korea
Take Over South Korea?
- Robert Spencer: Google Staffers
Claim Rigging Was Not Implemented
by Gordon G. Chang • September
25, 2018 at 5:00 am
- Throughout his visit
to North Korea, South Korean President Moon Jae-in went out of
his way to downplay the legitimacy of the government he leads
and the country he was elected to represent. He was not
asserting South Korea's right to exist.
- Up to now, the
South's textbooks have stated that Seoul is "the only
legitimate government on the Korean Peninsula." New
textbooks, however, do not include that declaration.
- Moon, unfortunately,
has undermined democracy in tangible ways. Since becoming
president in May of last year, he has used control of big
broadcasters to reduce access to dissenting views and to
promote North Korea's. Alarm is now widespread.
- If all this were not
enough, Moon is taking down defenses along invasion and
infiltration routes into Seoul and proposing substantial
reductions in the South Korean military. Americans should care
because by treaty they are obligated to defend the South.
North
Korean leader Kim Jong Un (right) guides South Korean President
Moon Jae-in during his visit in Pyongyang, North Korea, September
18, 2018. (Photo by Pyeongyang Press Corps/Pool/Getty Images)
Kim Jong Un assembled a reported 100,000 people,
many waving his North Korean flag or the blue-and-white unification
standard, to greet Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea, as he
arrived in Pyongyang on September 18.
President Moon did not seem to mind that no one was
holding the symbol of his country, the Republic of Korea.
"What was glaringly missing was the South Korean flag,"
Taro O of the Pacific Forum told Gatestone in e-mailed comments.
"Maybe South Korean people take comfort in seeing that
Samsung's Lee Jae-yong wore the South Korean flag badge on the
lapel of his jacket while in North Korea. No one in the Moon
administration did."
by Robert Spencer • September 25,
2018 at 4:00 am
- It wasn't
implemented? Really?
- On July 26, 2017, I
posted this at Jihad Watch: "Google bows to Muslim
pressure, changes search results to conceal criticism of Islam
and jihad." '
- In it, I recounted
Texas imam Omar Suleiman's successful effort to compel Google
to drop search results about Islam-related terms and topics
that reflected negatively upon Islam. Turkey's Anadolu Agency
reported happily:
"Google's
first page results for searches of terms such as 'jihad', 'shariah'
and 'taqiyya' now return mostly reputable explanations of the
Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which describes the circumstances under
which a Muslim can conceal their belief in the face of persecution,
is the sole term to feature a questionable website on the first
page of results."
It wasn't implemented? Really? On July 26, 2017, I
posted this at Jihad Watch: "Google bows to Muslim pressure,
changes search results to conceal criticism of Islam and
jihad." In it, I recounted Texas imam Omar Suleiman's
successful effort to compel Google to drop search results about
Islam-related terms and topics that reflected negatively upon
Islam. Turkey's Anadolu Agency reported happily:
"Google's first page results for searches of
terms such as 'jihad', 'shariah' and 'taqiyya' now return mostly
reputable explanations of the Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which
describes the circumstances under which a Muslim can conceal their
belief in the face of persecution, is the sole term to feature a
questionable website on the first page of results."
"Reputable": i.e., acceptable under the
Sharia prohibition on criticism of Islam. "Questionable
website": i.e., one that tells hard truths about Islam and
jihad.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment