Saturday, November 28, 2015

Can a Dying Civilization Defeat ISIS and Radical Islam?

Can a Dying Civilization Defeat ISIS and Radical Islam?

By any measure, we are losing the war against ISIS and radical Islam. A bigger problem is we do not yet realize we are losing or why. Their legions are growing, their ambitions are apocalyptic, and our resolve is as strong as silly putty.

Without question, our military is superior to any other on earth and we could inflict devastating damage to ISIS if we unleashed our military forces against them. But we are not going to do that—not today, not next month and not after the next atrocity strikes Cleveland, Phoenix or Richmond.
  • We have a President and his designated replacement-in-waiting who think “climate change” is a greater threat than Islamists with nuclear weapons, and that the way to defeat squads of suicide bombers is to welcome their brothers, sisters and cousins as our neighbors and give them the right to vote.
  • But we have a deeper problem than our commander in chief being AWOL. If you ask yourself how he can get away with never uttering the words “radical Islam,” then you might begin uncovering the deeper problem: Obama is not alone in willfully avoiding the truth about an enemy sworn to our destruction. He has many accomplices and coconspirators.
If we are honest we must face a very dark and sobering fact: The outcome of this war is far from certain. We are proud of being a nation of can-do optimists, but we are also a nation in denial about a culture in a tailspin.
  • The real enemy is not “over there” in Syria and Iraq, or in Paris or London. The enemy is already here in our homeland, and I am not speaking of terrorist cells, Syrian refugees, or radical imams. I am speaking of the accelerating rot in our own culture.
Our secular culture is adrift in a sea of relativism, escapism, and self-indulgent inanities, with our media and entertainment elites leading the parade.
  • “Where were you, Daddy, when we were waging the war on terror?” Oh, well, I was watching reality TV. On TV, the good guys always defeat the bad guys. And I can always change the channel.
In this besotted condition, we are ill equipped to fight an enemy full of passion, idealism and self-confidence. Islamist suicide bombers believe they are dying for a higher purpose, the greater glory of Allah.  What, exactly, are our ideals? The freedom to enjoy pornography and polygamy and 24-hour pizza delivery?
  • The war with ISIS and its Islamist allies is what historian Samuel P. Huntington called a “clash of civilizations” in a book by that title in 1996.
  • Tocqueville warned us 200 years ago that we would never be defeated by an invader, but we could abandon liberty by adopting a “soft tyranny” of democratic corruption.
  • The early 20th century economist Joseph Schumpeter gave a similar warning about the inevitable corruption of morals that comes with capitalism’s triumph. If everything is permitted in an open marketplace, higher values will be replaced by cheaper ones— and there is no principle within pure capitalism to halt that cultural degeneration.
Then in our generation, along comes “multiculturalism” to teach that there are no superior cultures, only different ones. Witchcraft is as much a legitimate personal religion as Christianity or Buddhism if that is what turns you on, and polygamy is just another “lifestyle” with its own cable TV channel.

The great Russian novelist Alexandr Solzhenitsyn saw this deepening hollowness in the West as a global development spanning five centuries, with Soviet Communism only a symptom of lost souls. In his Templeton Lecture in 1983, long before the rise of radical Islam, he warned:

It has become embarrassing to state that evil makes its home in the individual human heart before it enters a political system. Yet it is not considered shameful to make dally concessions to an integral evil. Judging by the continuing landslide of concessions made before the eyes of our very own generation, the West is ineluctably slipping toward the abyss.

ISIS and radical Islam have declared war on us not because of anything we have done—not because we are a friend to Israel and not because we have not yet toppled the bloody Syrian dictator Assad.  ISIS and radical Islamists hate us for who we are. The irony is, we ourselves do not know who we are.

The Chinese philosopher Sun Tsu said it best in The Art of War:

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

ISIS hates the West as an abominable nest of infidels, infidels who reject the Quran and Shariah Law, and so must be annihilated.  We are the obstacle to the new Caliphate. OKAY— got it: We stand against the Caliphate. But what do we stand for? What is our alternative ideal to the Islamist ideal? Those happy optimists who think this is a largely academic question should consider the generational dimension to cultural identities and dissatisfactions.
  • While radical Islam may indeed hold little attraction for the large majority of Muslim immigrants and refugees now relocating in Europe and America, it will be different matter for thousands of their children. The mastermind behind the Paris terror attack was the son of successful, fully assimilated Moroccan immigrants.
  • A growing number of reliable public opinion polls of Muslim populations (Pew, Gallup, Rasmussen, among others) reveal that 13% to 32% of Muslims have a positive view of ISIS — as do 17% of Syrian refugees.
So, it is both reasonable and prudent to ask ourselves — what percentage of the children of several million Muslim migrants will choose the values of our ascendant secular hedonism over the allure of “true Islam”? One percent of two million is 20,000 potential jihadists.

Radical Islam’s principles are out there for all to see if they open their eyes. But what are our principles? In truth, they are up for grabs.

Eagles of Death Metal Discuss Paris Terror Attacks

During Eagles of Death Metal's November 13 show at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris, gunmen entered the venue and opened fire on the crowd, leaving at least 90 dead. The band spoke to VICE about the tragic events that took place that night.

Geert Wilders Speaks in Dutch Court

Geert Wilders Speaks in Dutch Court

Link to Citizen Warrior

Posted: 27 Nov 2015 02:17 PM PST
Geert Wilders is a Member of Parliament in The Netherlands, leader of the Party for Freedom, and in my opinion, the Winston Churchill of our times

He is facing trial in 2016, for “inciting discrimination and hatred” against Moroccans living in the Netherlands. He asked his party supporters whether they want more or less Moroccans in the city and Netherlands, to which his audience replied with the chant “less, less, less!” For that, he must defend himself in court.

Geert Wilders delivered the following declaration before the Dutch court on November 25, 2015:

Mr. President, members of the Chamber,

I have the right to a fair trial. That is why I am here. Not to ask you a favor. But to ask you what I am entitled to. A fair trial. And the right to defend myself in the best possible way. If you do not give me that chance then this trial will be a farce.

During the first meeting, the investigative judge told to me, "You should have a fair chance; the law will be interpreted broadly." But the opposite has happened. All my 39 requests, all the requests from the defendant have been rejected. Apparently, I am not allowed an adequate defense.

The investigative judge is uncritically following the Public Prosecutor. The Chamber agreed with the Public Prosecutor to reject the first twelve requests. Hopefully, that will not be the case for the 27 rejections that you must decide on now. Because if all reasonable requests are rejected, then I cannot defend myself, and I apparently have to be sentenced at all costs.

I am taken to court for what I have said. But I have said nothing wrong.

Fewer Moroccans, fewer Syrians, fewer Mexicans, fewer Russians, I do not see why stating that is punishable. However, when Turkish members of the Dutch parliament call me a tumor that must be fought and when they compare me to Hitler, then there is no consternation, no massive complaints on pre-printed forms, no prime minister who speaks shame of it and no Public Prosecutor to come into action.

What kind of country are we living in?!

I speak for millions of Dutch. And I will continue to do so. That is my duty as a representative of the people. And that is my right. It is a travesty that I have to stand here before you today.

I have done nothing wrong. At least, I want to be allowed to defend myself in court. I want to hear witnesses and experts so that I can defend myself.

The investigative judge promised me a fair chance, but he did not give me such a chance. I now turn to you: Give me the chance to defend myself. Give me the chance to a fair trial.

U.S. Mosques MUST Be Dismantled; A Cancerous Scourge. Saving America By Removing Omertas. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

U.S. Mosques MUST Be Dismantled; A Cancerous Scourge. Saving America By Removing Omertas. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

THERE are certain topics which are verboten in “polite” society, hence, they are deemed “sacred cows” by the revolutionary left and their jihadi partners in anti-American crimes. It is way past time to change the calculus. Besides, who died and anointed them the arbiters of national discourse? Precisely.

AND it is into this vortex of Alice-in-Wonderland magical thinking that dissent with “dear leader” – of the (heretofore) free world, despite his words and concomitant heinous actions – is deemed the real crime. Even so, despite all his treachery over the past 7 years, few words tell the tale like his most recent, in reaction to the carnage in Paris (never mind his stone cold silence re the continuous slaughter of Jews in Israel) while responding to queries from media outlets: 
YES, ruminate over his stark and unambiguous statement, and let its ominous intent sink in. Then, internalize why he no longer has a need for his usual wishy-washy, finger-in-the-eye comments. Not only that, said words back up everything that this site – from its inception – has asserted: His hyper-disdain for American exceptionalism fuels his policy-making, and it is the root and core to his overall swathe of domestic and foreign fires. This anti-American worldview has always been where it’s at for HUSSEIN Obama.

MOST ominously, he no longer feels constrained by any boundaries – even those he used to employ via semantical gymnastics and double entendres – when speaking to the press, all the while he used to wink and nod to those he really intended to message. Effectively, the jig is up. 

IN this regard, Americans (westerners) must cease falling into the enemy’s trap by gifting them the ability to set the discourse and agenda. In other words, no one has the right to lecture and hector patriots about the inherent value of the Constitution. How dare they. Nevertheless, as revolutionary leftists and their Islamic counterparts violate the Constitution on a regular basis (mirroring the Traitor-in-Chief and his surrogates), they have the temerity to haul it out in defense of those whose “rights” are supposedly violated by patriots! Did you ever??

THUS, let’s head over to the most basic rights of all: 

Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

CLEAR as a bell.

TO wit, it is along this Orwellian minefield that patriots must navigate, thus, re-setting the narrative. Resultant, they must demonstrate how Islamists bastardize the Constitution to destroy the nation, and then hide behind freedom of religion to burrow inside these very same barracks and spearheads; their so-called religious mosques!

BUT once their abusive and highly dangerous behavior is understood for what it is, exposing it becomes an obligatory duty. Along these lines, several outings are mandatory reading:



AND if anyone knows the inside score, look no further than to a premier counter terror investigator and personal contact, one who has the complete inside track on what awaits America via said frontal spears: “Dave Gaubatz Warned (Jan. 2014): Mosques, Religiously Garbed Jihadi Indoctrination Camps!” 


MOVING right along, in April 2014, this site concluded: “American Mosques Are Priming For Jihadi Training!”


MORE pointedly, the Islamic Society of America (ISNA) is up to their necks in beheading, and they are the major umbrella which houses America’s mosques. Wow.


OH dear…certain mosques are hotter than hot, and that’s why the subject is repeated ad nauseam: “Detroit, Dearborne and Nashville are in the forefront of the assault charge!”

AND so on and so forth…

NOW, it has already been proven ISIS is very deeply embedded in America. So let’s not waste precious time on debating this point. Therefore, it stands to reason that their barracks within, the mosques, are priming to attack. A + B…continue reading

al-Qaradawi, one of the leading religious authorities in Sunni Islam, explains that Sharia Law requires the execution of those who leave Islam and refuse to return.
To further illuminate the difficult subjects we are discussing, we asked Israeli journalist Adina Kutnicki and American investigator and security specialist David Gaubatz to weigh in on the threat from ISIS and the expanding Islamist army.

Adina is an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and her previous interview about the expansionist ideology of the organization sent shock waves across the internet. Adina is an editor of several websites that examine the growing violence in the name of Islam, and she is the creator of a popular Israeli blog. Her insights into the conflict between Israel and the Islamic terrorists of Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority will give our readers an opportunity to find out the truth about the Middle East without the Israel bashing propaganda of the mainstream media.palest14(Hamas executes a man they claim was an Israeli collaborator. He received no trial and his body was dragged through the streets of Gaza after he was shot several times.)

David Gaubatz is the author of a book about the Council on American–Islamic Relations and the Islamic infiltration of America, Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America. Gaubatz is a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and a retired Federal Agent with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). With over three decades of combined experience, his career has led him on missions spanning the Middle East — from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Kuwait to Iraq. As a Special Federal Agent, he has received the highest forms of U.S. security clearances for top-secret intelligence information — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — and has been briefed into many black projects.
Wolff Bachner: You are the inspiration and brains behind a rather important program called The Mapping Shariah Project.

What exactly is The Mapping Shariah Project?

What have you uncovered about Islamic extremism being promoted in American Mosques, and what materials have you collected to document this unlawful, dangerous activity?

David Gaubatz: In 2007 – 2008, I was hired to be the Director of the Mapping Shariah Project (MSP). The project was funded by the Center for Security Policy and David Yerushalmi (attorney) handled the legal issues. We had PHD level professionals in Israel (Professor Mordechai Kedar) to analyze the data.

The essence of the research was for me to send teams to a couple hundred mosques throughout America and observe the Shariah adherence by the Islamic leaders and the Muslim worshippers. The theory was the more adherence to all aspects of Shariah law, the more likelihood the danger of violence (Physical Jihad). This was proved in the research.

We discovered over 75% of the 2300 mosques in America had violent Islamic material within the mosque. Most of the material was from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

For more detailed information on the MSP you can review the complete analysis at: ….continue reading

ALAS, in furtherance of the above bullet-proof ammunition (that which was collected via one whose boots on the ground are non-paralleled) to FINALLY shutter America’s mosques, let’s continue to an updated analysis from the very same Center For Security Policy, The Clarion Project.

The Clarion Project has identified over 80 Islamist organizations including mosques in the United States, resulting in prominent media coverage on FOX News Channel’s “Fox & Friends” and the Daily Caller website.

Watch Clarion Project’s National Security Analyst, Prof. Ryan Mauro, on “Fox & Friends” discussing four of the radical mosques and the need to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization:

The four organizations discussed in the segment are:
The segment follows the Daily Caller’s creation of a map of over 80 radical mosques based on Clarion’s research. This is about four percent of the estimated 2,106 mosques in the U.S., the news site wrote.

In addition to those 83 sites, there are many other Islamist organizations operating in the U.S. and mosques due to be written about. You can learn about Islamist groups in your state by searching the Islamist Organizations in America section of our website that is continuously updated.

The North American Islamic Trust’s (NAIT’s) website says it owns mosques in 42 states and has stated that it owns the titles to over 325 properties.

Click here for a partial list of mosques owned by NAIT

In January, a prominent Muslim leader in the United Kingdom with links to the Muslim Brotherhood estimated that half of the mosques in America were founded by Brotherhood members.

Senator Ted Cruz has introduced important legislation to help get the Muslim Brotherhood designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. The House version of the bill was introduced by Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and is now endorsed by five additional representatives.

We encourage readers to ask their congressmen and Senators (and presidential candidates) for their statements on this legislation and/or their general position on designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group.

BTW, this site has amassed independent evidence of all the aforementioned Brotherhood Mafia front groups, as well as the particular mosques cited. Mind you, having been “on site” at Masjid At-Taqwa of New York, well, to state that it is radical is a vast understatement!! This is precisely why it was featured at these pages. Not for nothing.

CONCLUSIVELY, this is for all patriots who recognize what awaits, if the status quo remains and the national agenda isn’t re-jiggered: Isn’t it obvious what must be done? Basically, just think of neighborhood mosques as daggers in the heart of America and demand their immediate shuttering. But if officialdom won’t do the heavy lifting, well, there are millions of patriots who will “assist” – one way or another! 

AS is said, there’s more than one way to skin a cat…hmm…if you avail yourselves of the double entendre.

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Turkey: Wrong Partner to Fight Terror

  • In Erdogan's usual Sunni supremacist language, he accused the victims of jihad rather than the jihadists.
  • "New tragedies will be inevitable," Erdogan said, "if the rising racism in Europe and other countries is not stopped." Yet Erdogan willingly ignores the rising racism, xenophobia, and anti-western, jihadist sentiments that increasingly command the hearts and minds of his fellow Turks.
  • How should Erdogan fight Islamic terror -- something he does not believe exists? One of Erdogan's famous remarks is, "there is no Islamic terror." But he thinks that "just like fascism," Zionism is a crime against humanity.
  • It is so funny that the free world cannot see that its ally in fighting the jihadists is another jihadist.
Racism is bad, no doubt. But it cannot be the reason why jihadists kill "infidels," including fellow Muslims in Muslim lands. Sadly, the free world feels compelled to partner with the wrong country in its fight against Islamic terror.

The host of this year's G-20 summit, which came right after the Nov. 13 Paris attacks, was Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. In his usual Sunni supremacist language, he accused the victims of jihad rather than the jihadists. "New tragedies will be inevitable," he said, "if the rising racism in Europe and other countries is not stopped. Racism, coupled with enmity against Islam, is the greatest disaster, the greatest threat."

Yet Erdogan willingly ignores the rising racism, xenophobia, and anti-western, jihadist sentiments that increasingly command the hearts and minds of his fellow Turks. A quick look at a few sports games and fan behavior in recent weeks would reveal much about the Turkish mind and heart.
On October 13, three days after a twin suicide bomb attack in Turkey's capital, Ankara, killed more than 100 Kurds and pro-Kurdish, leftist and secular Turks, the central Anatolian province of Konya, a hotbed of political Islam in Turkey, hosted a Euro 2016 football qualifier between Turkey and Iceland. Before the kick-off, both teams stood for a moment of silence to protest the bomb attack -- a typical gesture to respect the victims. Sadly, the moment of silence was marred by whistles and jeers: apparently the football fans of Konya were protesting the victims, not their jihadist killers.

Anyone under the impression that the whole world stands in solidarity with Paris should think again. Hundreds of Turkish fans booed and chanted "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is greater" in Arabic) during a moment of silence for the Paris attack victims before a Turkey-Greece soccer friendly. Once again, the Turks were exhibiting solidarity with the terrorists, not their "infidel" victims.
More recently, on Nov. 21, Turkish police had to deploy 1,500 policemen so that Turkish fans could not harm the visiting Israeli women's national basketball team. One thousand five hundred police officers at a women's basketball game! Despite that, Turkish fans threw objects at Israeli players as they were singing Israel's national anthem. Fans also booed the Israeli players while others applauded the fans who threw the objects.
Unsurprisingly, Turkish fans waved Palestinian flags. Israeli women basketball players were barred from leaving their hotel other than for training and the game.
None of that is surprising although, at least in theory, Turkey is a candidate state for membership in the European Union. A new study by Pew Research Center revealed that 8% of Turks have a favorable opinion of the Islamic State (IS), higher than in the Palestinian territories, where support for IS stands at 6%, and only one point lower than in Pakistan. Nineteen percent of Turks "do not know" if they have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of IS -- which means 27% of Turks do not have an unfavorable opinion of the jihadist killing machine. That makes more than 21 million people! Of the countries polled, Lebanon boasted a 100% unfavourable opinion of IS and Jordan, 94%. In Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, 4% reported a favourable opinion of IS, half of Turkey's.
This is Erdogan's "neo-Ottoman" and increasingly Islamist Turkey. After the Paris attacks, this author saw tweets that called the victims "animal carcass;" that said "now the infidels will lose their sleep out of fear;" and others that congratulated the terrorists "who shouted Allah-u aqbar."
Meanwhile, and so funny, the free world cannot see that its ally to fight the jihadists is another jihadist. How should Erdogan fight Islamic terror – something he does not believe exists? One of Erdogan's famous remarks is, "there is no Islamic terror." But he thinks that "just like fascism," Zionism is a crime against humanity.

Turkish President (then Prime Minister) Recep Tayyip Erdogan, right, meeting with Hamas leaders Khaled Mashaal (center) and Ismail Haniyeh on June 18, 2013, in Ankara, Turkey. One of Erdogan's famous remarks is, "there is no Islamic terror." (Image source: Turkey Prime Minister's Press Office)

There is a Turkish saying that could perhaps describe the free world's alliance with Erdogan's Turkey against jihadist terror: "Kuzuyu kurda emanet etmek" ("to trust the wolf with the sheep").
Burak Bekdil, based in Ankara, is a Turkish columnist for the Hürriyet Daily and a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

14,000 illegal immigrants disappear without trace

14,000 illegal immigrants disappear without trace
Swedish police officers patrolling Stockholm. Photo: Tomas Oneborg/SvD/TT

14,000 illegal immigrants disappear without trace

Published: 27 Nov 2015 16:52 GMT+01:00
Updated: 27 Nov 2015 17:42 GMT+01:00

A total of 21,748 people had been given deportation orders by the Migration Agency at the end of October – the largest number in history, the Aftonbladet tabloid reported on Friday.

Of those, 14,140 are registered by police as 'departed' or 'wanted'. Some are believed to still be at unknown locations in Sweden while others are thought to have left the country.

"We simply don't know where they are," Patrik Engström, head of the national border police, told the newspaper.

The rest of the individuals either remain in refugee centres, are in custody, or are living in separate accommodation which they have arranged themselves, awaiting deportation.

The government has previously announced it wants to step up efforts to ensure people without legal right to stay in Sweden exit the country. But police say most of its resources are currently devoted to carrying out ID checks after Sweden stepped up border controls.

"It's a huge task and it is completely dependent on the police being allocated resources," said Engström.

READ ALSO: 'Sweden must speed up deportations'

The Local reported in May that an increasing proportion of refugees due to be deported from Sweden were instead disappearing.

Last year the proportion of those leaving the country voluntarily after an expulsion order was 41 percent. Some of the remaining numbers were forcibly deported, but in most cases the refugees went underground.

The Migration Agency said at the time that the vast majority of the "disappeared" were Dublin Regulation cases.

Under the Dublin Regulation, refugees should be deported back to the first EU country they entered, often Italy or Greece, which have the worst welfare provision. But if refugees can delay their re-applications by 18 months, they may be able to stay in Sweden, hence the motivation to go underground.

It is often difficult to deport refugees directly to their home countries, which in many cases refuse to accept them.

VIDEO: ‘I’ll Kill You, C*cksucker!’ – Hungarian Lorry Driver Swerves To Hit Migrants In Warzone Calais

VIDEO: ‘I’ll Kill You, C*cksucker!’ – Hungarian Lorry Driver Swerves To Hit Migrants In Warzone Calais

A Hungarian lorry driver has uploaded his expletive-laden rants as he drives through Calais, fending off migrants throwing bottles.

The unidentified big-rig driver has uploaded a remarkable 15-minute dashboard cam video (full clip below) of his drive to the port of Calais, which more resembles a journey through a warzone than a major conduit of international trade.

The clip shows his lorry being swarmed by migrants, which he shouts to as they bend his wing-mirrors back so he can’t see them trying to climb aboard. Aware that one migrant has climbed into the gap between the cab and the trailer, the driver shouts out of the window: “If you cut my pneumatic lines, I’ll kill you, you cocksucker. Get down off there!

“Don’t bend my mirror, you great poofter, you cocksucking moron, go fuck yourself… I need this mirror: Don’t bend my mirror! Get the fuck out of here and back into your father’s ballsack!”

As another lorry ploughs through the crowd while blasting its horn, the driver picks up speed.
Hurling insults at migrants as he drives, the Hungarian man swings the truck into the hard shoulder in the direction of migrants, before pulling it back into the road, not hitting anyone. The migrants return the favour by pelting the lorry with glass bottles.

Aiming the lorry for the migrant group, the driver screams in Hungarian: “Come here, with your fucking whore mothers, I’ll drive right through the lot of you!

“Comer here, you fucking mother fuckers… come on then! Fuck the lot of you. You and all your fucking whore mothers too!”.

In the full length video, the driver is generally less aggressive with his driving but no less angry in his tirades. Speaking to the camera, the driver explains he made the video to help people explain how bad things are in Calais, and to show them the truth. Appealing to the viewer, he says:

“Can you imagine what things are like, at night? …in the dark? Now that you’ve seen how things are in the daytime?”

Speaking to the viewer as well as the migrants by the road, the driver says, laughing to himself: “Why the fuck aren’t you all at home fighting? Your womenfolk are having to take up arms in your homeland, against your bourgeois regime and ISIS, you fuckwits”.

“And you lot are all here on the make instead. You lame bunch of dogs. You people are all just freeloading scrounging scum. You deserve to rot, all of you, alongside the [incomprehensible] with which you all suck each other off.

“While your wives are all fighting against terrorists, with machine guns! Fuck the lot of you”.

Clearly angered at the invasion of his own home nation by migrants pouring through the Balkans into Europe and exasperated by the state of Calais, the driver passes police and hundreds of migrants in 15 minutes of driving.

Passing a French police van, the driver laments the insignificant police presence, remarking there are only five officers to be seen for 18,000 migrants. Leaning out of the window and addressing the officers in French, he opines: “You need to have a wall of police either side of the motorway, because of these filthy scum”.

Violence towards lorry drivers from migrants attempting to break in to trucks as they drive to England is now a matter of daily routine for the men who make the run through Calais. Many have resorted to carrying weapons for self defence as they fear for their lives, as Breitbart London reported in November.
The tractor of a Czech driver after his lorry was attacked by migrants / Facebook

Although illegal in Britain, ‘Taser’ stun guns and CS gas are now being hidden in cabs by fearful drivers. One said at the time: “It’s risky ­because if you get caught with these weapons in Britain you are committing a criminal offence.

“But we need to be able to protect ourselves. The migrants are now arming ­themselves with knives and hammers and all sorts and they’re getting more and more ­aggressive.

“I think something bad will happen soon where either a migrant will kill a truck driver or it’ll happen the other way round”.

A shocking example of the dangers faced by truckers in Calais was illustrated today in a Breitbart London exclusive, with pictures showing how a driver brushed with death after a migrant-hurled wooden stake penetrated the screen of his cab.

Blaming the incident on the immigration policies of the European Union, the director of the haulage firm operating the lorry told Breitbart: “they threw the wooden stake through his window.
“Then five or six people on each side climbed up onto the cab and were trying to break in. They tried to destroy the cab.

“He was unarmed and defenceless so carried on driving with the wood in his window to get away. When he got to Calais he stopped and asked for assistance, but the police told him that as no one was injured they wouldn’t do anything”.

Watch: 15 Minutes Driving in Calais:

Follow Oliver Lane on Twitter: or e-mail to:

EXCLUSIVE: Calais Trucker’s Close Brush With Death as Migrants Hurl WOODEN STAKE Through Cab Window

EXCLUSIVE: Calais Trucker’s Close Brush With Death as Migrants Hurl WOODEN STAKE Through Cab Window

A Czech truck driver passing through Calais has narrowly avoided being killed by migrants when they hurled a long wooden stake through the window of his cab before mobbing his vehicle. The driver was able to speed away, but police at the port said they were unable to offer assistance as he was not hurt during the attack.

But the attack, which took place on Wednesday night, has taken its toll on the driver’s career, as the frightening experience has left him unwilling to make the cross-channel journey again.

His boss has laid the blame for the attack at the feet of the European Union (EU), as he believes it’s not within the power of any one country to stem the tide of the migrant flow while tied into the wider union. However, he had some choice words for German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has refused to back down on Germany’s open door policy to migrants holding Syrian passports.
Describing the attack, Radek Novak, managing director of freight company Vlastimil Hajek told Breitbart London exclusively: “It attack happened on Wednesday night. Our driver was heading into the port when a group of immigrants – I’d like to use a stronger word but I won’t – shouted at him to stop. They asked him for food, for clothing, and for money.

“When he refused, that was when they threw the wooden stake through his window.

“Then five or six people on each side climbed up onto the cab and were trying to break in. They tried to destroy the cab.

“He was unarmed and defenceless so carried on driving with the wood in his window to get away.

When he got to Calais he stopped and asked for assistance, but the police told him that as no one was injured they wouldn’t do anything.

“They don’t care.”

A picture of the lorry with the stake through its window has been widely shared by haulage drivers on social media. One driver, who passes through Calais regularly commented: “This has got to stop. The authorities MUST do something about it to protect our lives, our safety and our vehicles. I can’t think of any other modernised and civilised European country that would allow this to happen.”

Others have pointed out that it was lucky it wasn’t a British right hand drive vehicle, as the driver would have been killed. The stake was about six to eight feet in length.

Novak said, following the stressful attack, his driver has decided to stop taking cross-channel loads, as it’s just too risky:
lorry 3
“This is now his last journey to England, he’s refusing to go again. He has been working for me for 14 years, he’s one of my best drivers.”

Radek says it’s not a problem for the English or French governments alone to sort out as it’s a global problem, although he apportions some of the blame to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Above all, however, he’s adamant that the European Union is at fault. “I would like to see us leave the Union” he says, adding. “I’m worried for my country, I’m worried for my children.”

And, he says, he’s worried for Britain, which he believes should also leave the EU. “I visited England about five years ago,” he said. “For the first three or four days I was there, I didn’t meet a single British person. Everyone was an immigrant, at the hotels, at the car hire, not a single person was English.”

Hundreds of migrants have been rioting all this week outside the French port, causing delays to ferry services and long traffic tail-backs. Although riot police have been intermittently forcing the crowds back using tear gas, many of the migrants have retaliated by hurling stones and rocks, at the police – and at lorries, smashing cab windows.

Some drivers have taken a more proactive approach to defending themselves from migrant attack. Breitbart London reproduced today the remarkable dash-cam footage of a Hungarian driver who was determined to not become a victim — and used his lorry to charge migrants by the side of the road.

Anonymous hackers’ list of ‘pro-ISIS’ Twitter accounts they claim to have taken down included BBC News, Barack Obama Hillary Clinton and host of others unrelated to terror

Anonymous hackers’ list of ‘pro-ISIS’ Twitter accounts they claim to have taken down included BBC News, Barack Obama Hillary Clinton and host of others unrelated to terror 

  • Anonymous 'hit list' claims to have disabled more than 20,000 pro-ISIS accounts
  • List includes BBC News, Barack Obama, the White House, State Department, and CNN
  • Other accounts only appear to be listed because they're in Arabic
  • See full news coverage on ISIS at 

Hacker group Anonymous' declaration of war on ISIS-related social media accounts has hit a bizarre stumbling block.

While the group released what it said was a hit list of 20,000 pro-ISIS Twitter accounts via anonymous-text sharing site Pastebin, the list actually includes accounts for US President Barack Obama, US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, BBC News, the New York Times, CNN, and other individual journalist accounts.  

Other accounts on the 'hit list' appear to have no connection to ISIS, and say they have only been included as they are in Arabic.  

Anonymous has been disabling pro-ISIS twitter accounts since the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris, but have redoubled their efforts since Friday 13th, which saw 130 people die at the hands of ISIS fanatics. 

Scroll down for video 
The group released what it said was a hit list of 20,000 pro-ISIS Twitter accounts via anonymous-text sharing site Pastebin, the list actually includes accounts for US President Barack Obama, US presidential candidate Hilary Clinton, BBC News, CNN, and other individual journalist accounts

Friday, November 27, 2015

The death of an Ahwazi Arab prisoner in the prison was described "suspicious"

 Friday, November 27, 2015 6:23:01 PM

Ahwazi Human rights activists cited sources in Ahwaz who reported that Mohammad Hammadi, an Ahwazi Arab prisoner, died under suspicious circumstances. According to human rights activists, Hammadi, 35, after spending seven years of his ten-year sentence, died in suspicious circumstances in the clinic Molasani on Friday.

Karim Dahimi, the Ahwazi Human rights activist, based in London, in contact with Farsi Al Arabiya, said Mohammed Hammadi in 2008 was arrested by the Ministry of Intelligence and charged with acting against national security and was condemned to ten years prison by the Revolutionary Court in Ahwaz.

Quoting from Hammadi relatives, Karim said that the body of the prisoner now is held in the hospital morgue in Ahwaz and their anguished families are about to receive the body of their son.

One of the medical staff of Shiban clinic in response to the families of the prisoners said that Mohammad had died before reaching the clinic. After transferring the body of Mohammed Hamadi to Hospital, one of his relatives after observing the dead body, claimed that he found choking bruises on his neck.

Prison terms of Mohammad Hammadi were mostly served in infamous Sepidar prison, but few months ago he was transferred to another prison between Weiss and Molasani divisions, 25 km away of Ahwaz city, known as Shiban prison (vocational training centers in Ahwaz).

One of Mohammad's relative said that he had enjoyed good health and did not suffer from any physical illness but on Friday morning the family of Mohammad received phone contact from prison authorities informing them the situation of their son is deteriorating and to visit Mohammad they can come to Molasani clinic.

The family of Mohammad Hammadi visited the clinic Mollasani, which is affiliated to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, where surprisingly they were told that their son had died due to stroke.

Murdering and execution Are Iran's last resort to liquidating Ahwazi prisoners. The death of the political activist of Ahwaz "Mohammed Odeh Hammadi" coincides with the days of the death of the great poet of Ahwaz, Star Sayahi (Abu Srour) who was killed in jail. Iranian security authorities resorted to using such methods to get rid of a lot of Ahwazi political activists, in particular of whom Ghaban Abideaua and Mohammed Cheldawi and others, some of whom under torture and some of them under mysterious and suspicious circumstances.

By: Rahim Hamid

Egyptian Cleric: ISIS Grows out of Islamic Mainstream

Middle East Forum
Promoting American Interests

Facebook  Twitter  RSS  Join Mailing List
Follow the Middle East Forum

Egyptian Cleric: ISIS Grows out of Islamic Mainstream

by Raymond Ibrahim  •  Nov 25, 2015
Cross-posted from Coptic Solidarity
Be the first of your friends to like this.
Originally published under the title "Al Azhar and ISIS: Cause and Effect."
Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr heads a group of former Al Azhar graduates who support a civil government.
Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah Nasr, a scholar of Islamic law and graduate of Egypt's Al Azhar University—regularly touted as the world's most prestigious Islamic university—recently exposed his alma mater in a televised interview.
After being asked why Al Azhar, which is in the habit of denouncing secular thinkers as un-Islamic, refuses to denounce the Islamic State as un-Islamic, Sheikh Nasr said:
It can't [condemn the Islamic State as un-Islamic]. The Islamic State is a byproduct of Al Azhar's programs. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic? Al Azhar says there must be a caliphate and that it is an obligation for the Muslim world [to establish it]. Al Azhar teaches the law of apostasy and killing the apostate. Al Azhar is hostile towards religious minorities, and teaches things like not building churches, etc. Al Azhar upholds the institution of jizya [extracting tribute from religious minorities]. Al Azhar teaches stoning people. So can Al Azhar denounce itself as un-Islamic?
Nasr joins a growing chorus of critics of Al Azhar. Last September, while discussing how the Islamic State burns some of its victims alive—most notoriously, a Jordanian pilot—Egyptian journalist Yusuf al-Husayni remarked on his satellite program that "The Islamic State is only doing what Al Azhar teaches... and the simplest example is Ibn Kathir's Beginning and End."
Al Azhar, which the New York Times calls "Sunni Islam's leading religious institution," refuses to denounce ISIS as un-Islamic.
Ibn Kathir is one of Sunni Islam's most renowned scholars; his Beginning and End is a magisterial history of Islam and a staple at Al Azhar. It is also full of Muslims, beginning with Muhammad, committing the sorts of atrocities that the Islamic State and other Islamic organizations and persons commit.
In February, Egyptian political writer Dr. Khalid al-Montaser revealed that Al Azhar was encouraging enmity for non-Muslims, specifically Coptic Christians, and even inciting for their murder. Marveled Montaser:
Is it possible at this sensitive time — when murderous terrorists rest on texts and understandings of takfir [accusing Muslims of apostasy], murder, slaughter, and beheading — that Al Azhar magazine is offering free of charge a book whose latter half and every page — indeed every few lines — ends with "whoever disbelieves [non-Muslims] strike off his head"?
The prestigious Islamic university—which co-hosted U.S. President Obama's 2009 "A New Beginning" speech—has even issued a free booklet dedicated to proving that Christianity is a "failed religion."
In short, the phenomenon known as "ISIS" is not a temporal aberration within Islam but rather a byproduct of what is considered normative thinking for Al Azhar—the Islamic world's most authoritative university.
Raymond Ibrahim is a Judith Friedman Rosen Fellow at the Middle East Forum
Related Topics:  Egypt, Radical Islam  |  Raymond Ibrahim

To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to