Hamas's
Academic Apologists
by Cinnamon Stillwell
American Thinker
August 31, 2014
Be the first of
your friends to like this.
Reaction by Middle East studies professors to Israel's recent effort
to destroy Hamas's terrorist infrastructure epitomizes their perennial
pro-Hamas, anti-Israel, and anti-American biases. In lieu of reasoned,
informed, and balanced assessments, they proffer extremist rhetoric that
demonizes Israel and America while ignoring Hamas's misdeeds: rockets
aimed at Israeli civilians, kidnappings and murder, disregard for
ceasefires, and the cynical use of Palestinian civilians--including
children--as human shields.
Two groups--Middle East Scholars
and Librarians and Historians
Against the War--signed letters advocating a boycott of Israeli academic
institutions and accusing Israel of war crimes that demand the end to
U.S. military aid, respectively.
Many, however, took their pro-Hamas, anti-Israel antipathies far
beyond petitioning to spew forth hyperbolic and mendacious
rhetoric that reveals far more about the fevered imaginations of the
professoriate than about their intended target.
Ignoring that Hamas started the war, Juan Cole,
a history professor at the University of Michigan, declared that,
"Israel's only real strategy is causing war, not ending war."
Despite the fact that no Israeli politician has advocated genocide and
that none has been committed, Cole
alleged that, "Israeli nationalists have been arguing for war crimes
at an alarming rate. . . . Too many Israelis have justifications in their
minds for genocide."
Similarly, Rashid
Khalidi, who teaches modern Arab Studies at the Columbia University,
maintained that, "By parroting deceitful Israeli talking points
about 'self-defense' and 'human shields,' they -- US and its allies --
make themselves complicit in what may well amount to war crimes."
Meanwhile, As'ad
AbuKhalil, a political scientist at California State University,
Stanislaus, argued that, "With every war, with every massacre, and
with every 'assault,' Israel (the government and its people) genuinely
thinks that this war crime would do the job and finish off the flame of
Palestinian nationalism once and for all." "The US media and
government are willing to justify any Israeli war crime no matter the
scale," he added.
Stanford University history professor Joel
Beinin vilified Israeli society while portraying Palestinians as
passive victims: "The public devaluation of Arab life enables a
society that sees itself as 'enlightened' and 'democratic' to repeatedly
send its army to slaughter the largely defenseless population of the Gaza
Strip."
Joseph
Massad, professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at
Columbia University, imagined in characteristically lurid detail,
"The carnage that Israeli Jewish soldiers and international Zionist
Jewish brigades of baby-killers are committing in Gaza (and the West
Bank, including East Jerusalem, let alone against Palestinian citizens of
Israel)."
Employing a grossly ahistorical comparison to the Holocaust, Hamid
Dabashi, who teaches Iranian studies and comparative literature at
Columbia University, likened Israelis to Nazis and Gaza to Auschwitz:
"After Gaza, not a single living Israeli can utter the word
'Auschwitz' without it sounding like 'Gaza.' Auschwitz as a historical
fact is now archival. Auschwitz as a metaphor is now Palestinian. From
now on, every time any Israeli, every time any Jew, anywhere in the
world, utters the word 'Auschwitz,' or the word 'Holocaust,' the world
will hear 'Gaza.'"
Nadia
Abu El-Haj, an anthropology professor at Barnard College–Columbia
University, exploited another overwrought
and mendacious analogy: "The IDF's tactics recall the logic of the
British and American fire-bombing of German and Japanese cities during
the Second World War: target the civilian population. Make them pay an
unbearable price. Then they will turn against their own regime."
Peddling a disproven
conspiracy theory
involving the three Israeli teenagers whose kidnapping and murder
preceded the war, Noura
Erekat, a human rights law professor at George Mason University ,
claimed that "Israel knew that these boys had been murdered very
early on," but that it nonetheless, "continued to fan racist
and war-mongering flames." Erekat also disregarded the vulnerability
of Israeli civilians: "Hamas cannot hurt Israel at all militarily. .
. . Israeli citizens enjoy relative security. In contrast, Palestinians
are enduring an all-out massacre."
Abdullah
Al-Arian, a history professor at Georgetown University's School of
Foreign Service in Qatar, claimed preposterously that, "Hamas has
not chosen the option of a military or violent confrontation with
Israel." Yet Al-Arian
hypocritically praised the terrorist group's assault on Israeli civilians
as "exceeding all expectations." Rounding out this trifecta, he
later compared Israel to the terrorist group Islamic State of Iraq and
Levant (ISIL or ISIS).
Ratcheting up the absurdity, Hatem
Bazian, a lecturer in Near Eastern studies and director of the
Islamophobia Research & Documentation Project at the University of
California, Berkeley, equated Israeli policy with slavery and accused
Israel of being behind Latin American death squads: "We need to make
a link between what is taking place today in Palestine and the whole
transnational, anti-colonial, anti-slavery, and anti-oppression struggle.
. . . You need to understand the link of Israel to what's taking place in
Latin America. . . . Israel was helping the death squads and training
them."
Such cheerleading
for Palestinian terrorism and willful disregard of historical facts
discredits the individuals who advance it and the academic culture of
Middle East studies that rewards it. It is politicized rather than
objective, propagandistic rather than principled. American interests at
home and abroad are ill-served by these apologists for terrorists.
Cinnamon Stillwell is the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project
of the Middle East Forum.
She can be reached at stillwell@meforum.org.
This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an
integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its
author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
Related Items
|
No comments:
Post a Comment