Tuesday, September 16, 2014

David Cameron’s Islamic Groundhog Day

David Cameron’s Islamic Groundhog Day

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2014/09/15/david-camerons-islamic-groundhog-day/

By: Paul Wilkinson

Following the unfortunate news that on Saturday, September 13, British aid worker David Haines had been brutally beheaded in Syria, the cycle of denial and inaction after Islamic-inspired violence continues unabated in the former ‘Great’ Britain.

Allah’s willing ‘Islamic State’ executioner was a yet (at least publically anyway) unidentified as a ‘British’ citizen, with a south-eastern English accent, dubbed by the media as ‘Jihadi John’. 

Photo Source: http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/56357/Alan-Henning-Briton-held-by-Isil-is-Manchester-taxi-driver-who-drove-aid-van-to-Syria
Photo Source: http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/56357/Alan-Henning-Briton-held-by-Isil-is-Manchester-taxi-driver-who-drove-aid-van-to-Syria

Jihadi John had already decapitated American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, and now a taxi driver from Salford, Alan Henning, is the next in line to have his head cut off by this pious Muslim. Henning voluntarily teamed up to help with a Muslim charity (pictured above) to deliver aid to Syrian refugees but was kidnapped last Christmas time and will inevitably pay the ultimate price.
However Muslim groups are always quick to disassociate Islam with this glaringly obvious Qur’an-inspired terror and pounce on an opportunity and play the ‘victim role’. They duly forecasted a ‘backlash’, aka a ‘tidal wave of Islamophobia’, that will engulf the nation due to David Haines’ execution. However based on the vastly over-exaggerated events after Drummer Lee Rigby’s murder by ‘Muslim hate-crime’ monitoring – ‘Tell Mama UK’, I confidently predict there will be no more than a ripple this time, if anything at all.

Additionally and probably encouraged by Obama’s speech (click here for ‘The Truth About ISIS & Obama’s War Speech’ video) about ‘tackling the Islamic State’, another “…group of ‘prominent Muslims’ has written to David Cameron to ask that he use a different name for the group (Islamic State), and to lead a national debate on what it should be called. ‘We propose that “Un-Islamic State” (UIS) could be an accurate and fair alternative name to describe this group and its agenda – and we will begin to call it that.‘”

Of course we have heard it all before from Muslim spokesmen like these and their liberal apologists but “until the leading Islamic scholars provide a peaceful theology that clearly contradicts the violent views of the IS, the existence of a ‘moderate Islam’ must be questioned.

Déjà vu!

Britain should never have allowed Muslims to settle in large numbers. It defies all logic, but now decades of political correctness and the sheer weight of Muslim immigration has sealed our fate. Matters are made worse by having an incompetent leader like Cameron, who had already appointed himself as ‘chief swamp-drainer’ after Lee Rigby’s death. Now Cameron’s rhetoric has included that we ‘must drain this poison from our society’ – but this ‘poison’ is pure, undiluted Islam. Cameron refuses to name or acknowledge that Islamic ideology which is at war with us, so how can we fight it?

Most worryingly of all though totally predictable was when ashen-faced Prime Minister David Cameron, delivered a prepared statement (watch here) the day after David Haines was killed, totally exonerating Islam yet again: “They (Islamic State) are killing and slaughtering thousands of people… they boast of their brutality… they claim to do this in the name of Islam, that is nonsense, Islam is a religion of peace. They are not Muslims, they are monsters.

And so on and so on. Totally devoid of any debate, analysis or the quoting of Islamic scripture, dissection of current affairs and/or historical events, Islam is declared ‘A Religion of Peace’, by politicians and Muslim leaders. This unwavering narrative closes the debate and is offensive to anyone who knows any of the basics of Islam, and wants to promote dialogue to promote change and attempt a path ultimately towards a more peaceful future. To name but a basic few things Cameron should be aware are as follows:
  • Islam was spread by the sword, killing many millions, across North Africa, the Middle East and Asia.
  • Europe was relentlessly attacked for centuries by Muslim armies.
  • Shari’a law states that a Muslim apostate should be killed, a thief’s hands are chopped off, and blasphemy against Allah or Prophet Mohammed results in execution.
  • One only needs to follow current affairs to see that thousands of people are killed by devout Muslims every year, and sectarian hatred amongst different sects is rampant.
  • The biggest and most brutal schism is between the Sunni and Shiite sects, and this has been ongoing since Prophet Muhammad’s death.
Apologists may in due course argue that Jihadi John is a disaffected, from a working class background, but here an educated ‘British’ medical student relocates to Syria and poses with a severed head. Source:  http://en.protothema.gr/a-medical-student-pictured-holding-a-severed-head/
Apologists may in due course argue that Jihadi John is a disaffected, from a working class background, but here an educated ‘British’ medical student relocates to Syria and poses with a severed head. Source: http://en.protothema.gr/a-medical-student-pictured-holding-a-severed-head/

Without question, the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Britain are peaceful and non-violent, but to deny that holy warriors like Jihadi John and his Islamic State comrades are inspired by being told that Prophet Muhammad was the ‘perfection of humanity’, to be emulated, and the Qur’an’s call to arms, is ludicrous. The Qur’an’s many open-ended commands to fight the unbelievers in chapter nine and elsewhere, and subsequently that jihadists will receive a greater reward in the afterlife, is a far bigger incentive than the governments ‘Prevent’ program and its message of ‘de-radicalisation’, can ever be. (Notably these hateful and violence-inciting commands in the Qur’an override any earlier peaceful verses that apologists often to refer to.)

Tellingly, Cameron made his latest hand-washing remarks after having to cut short his attendance of a wedding celebration on Saturday evening. Like everyone else Cameron is entitled to time off and a private life, but just like Obama playing golf, there are times when leading a country is somewhat more important. Or at the very least do not get photographed ‘chillaxing’ at a wedding while a British aid worker’s execution is imminent, hundreds of British-born Muslims are waging holy war in the Middle East, Muslim child grooming gangs are running amok and the Scottish vote on Independence is just days away.

No progress in defeating radical Islam will occur until someone says ‘Stop’ (or is allowed to say ‘Stop’) to break this cycle – and Cameron certainly will never say ‘Stop’. Islamic State are ‘monsters’ – that is stating the obvious, but importantly they are Muslims as well, strict Muslims in fact, who follow Prophet Muhammad’s example and the commands of the Qur’an. Who do you think knows Islam better, David Cameron or Islamic State’s Caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who has a Doctorate in Islamic Studies?

Source: Twitter @JohnCaveAusten
Source: Twitter @JohnCaveAusten

If only Britain had a Winston Churchill clone as leader

Tony Blair’s foreign policies made him a warmonger, and he also caused permanent damage at home to British society with Labour’s policies towards immigration, almost doubling the Muslim population in just over a decade, with a total lack of emphasis on integration. Blair was a dangerous man who knew nothing about Islam or the Muslim world, but a weak leader he was certainly not.
Cameron’s ignorance of ‘The Religion of Peace’ also goes hand-in-hand with a total lack of awareness and understanding of Islam and how the Muslim world operates. After Britain provided assistance with the aerial strike force to help remove Gaddafi and subsequently leave Libya as a failed state being fought over by Islamic militias, Cameron then wanted to arm Syrian ‘rebels’ and bomb Assad’s forces. Now it appears that Western powers will eventually need Assad’s assistance in some capacity if they are to combat the Islamic State, especially as the Syrian regime has ‘boots on the ground’.

However whichever way you assess the situation, Cameron despite appearing to talk tough at times, is an appeaser and a very weak leader, who does not appear to understand the basics of what Islam actually is. This is a major problem as Paul Austin Murphy argues:

“Since David Cameron became Prime Minister, he might have spent a few hours maximum independently studying Islam. But he most certainly won’t have chosen his own works to study. What will have happened, again, is that his civil servants, or perhaps certain Muslims within the party, will have supplied him with some Islam-friendly literature. He would have read all that and taken most of it at face value quite simply because he literally hasn’t got the time to study Islam in detail — let alone be critical. Besides which, Cameron will acquire the information he needs in order to be a successful politician. And being a critic of Islam, he may well think, will never pay him political dividends.”

Robert Spencer highlighted on the Jihad Watch blog:

“Western leaders are so anxious to dissociate the Islamic State from Islam because they want to reassure their non-Muslim citizens that the Muslims they have brought to their countries in ever-increasing numbers will never act the way the Islamic State is acting. One problem with this is that while Muslim leaders in the West are denouncing the Islamic State, they still have no organized program to teach Muslims to reject its understanding of Islam.”

It would be interesting viewing if Robert Spencer, being an expert on Islam’s foundational texts, were allowed to debate David Cameron, as to whether Islam is a peaceful religion or not. This will not happen anytime soon because the Foreign Office has banned both Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from visiting our ‘Great’ Britain because they are scared of Muslims becoming violent as a consequence, further indirect evidence that Islam truly is ‘a Religion of Peace’.

Cameron’s government and previous government policies, filtering down to local authorities, demonstrate that there has been an abject failure through paralysis caused by fear generated by decades of unchecked political correctness, to tackle any problem within Muslim communities arising from Islam itself or its associated culture. The recent Rotherham child sex-grooming case where at the last count, at least 1425 English girls were systematically raped by Muslim gangs (one girl was murdered and an estimated one hundred illegitimate children were born) emphasises this point.

Police let these Muslim gangs operate with impunity, even protected them for 16 years, while the victims and their families were ignored and even arrested, all to outwardly appear to the general public that tolerance, social cohesion, diversity and multiculturalism are successful. As the Rotherham Abuse enquiries begin several leading Labour –run council and police figures still refuse to accept responsibility or resign from their posts. Their bunker mentality emulates from years of ‘Diversity’ and ‘Cultural Awareness’ training courses and applying that theory in practice – and their belief is unshakable. Their only public admission being is that they were ‘surprised at the scale of the abuse’.
Source: http://hateandanger.wordpress.com/2012/08/21/be-brave/
Source: http://hateandanger.wordpress.com/2012/08/21/be-brave/

The situation in Britain was all so avoidable but is now a hopeless case as no one in power is prepared to stick their neck out to state what is glaringly obvious. Islam itself can encourage individuals to become violent and lead to a culture where Muslims feel entitled to abuse and rape non-Muslims. This change of attitude and behaviour can happen to any Muslim; even a trainee doctor from Britain was pictured holding a severed head in Syria recently.

If only David Cameron would let Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and many other counter-jihadists to visit the UK, and hopefully meet them, he would learn so much about Islamic doctrine and how best to deal with any threats. We need to try something different instead of the same tired old rhetoric because Britain is totally failing with dealing with the issues and problems arising from Muslim immigration.

Churchill was right about Islam and Nazism. How we could do with him now.

Related Reading:



How the US and Qatar Created ISIS, Monster of 100,000 Assassins
Islamic Caliphate: Europe and America Are Next
Saudi King Warns of Terrorist Threat, but White House Not Worried
The Scapegoating Continues: “ISIS a ‘Zionist’ Conspiracy”
Britons Will Never Be Slaves?
Islamisation: The Cultural Suicide of the West
Dhimmis in the UK: Britain’s Useful Idiots Furthering Islam
Liberalism: Britain’s Descent into the Multicultural Abyss
Muslim ‘Enrichment’ in Britain: One Week Snapshot

No comments:

Post a Comment