In this mailing:
Islam and the "Killing of Innocents"
by Denis MacEoin
• September 17, 2014 at 5:00 am
"No
religion condones the killing of innocents." — U.S. President Barack
Obama, September 10, 2014.
"Islam
is a religion of peace." — U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, September
13, 2014.
"There
is a place for violence in Islam. There is a place for jihad in Islam."
— U.K. Imam Anjem Choudary, CBN News, April 5, 2010.
Regrettably
it is impossible to re-interpret the Qur'an in a "moderate" manner.
The most famous modern interpretation by Sayyid Qutb (d. 1966), the Muslim
Brotherhood ideologue, leads the reader again and again into political
territory, where jihad is at the root of action.
If they
deviated from the true faith -- as we are seeing in the Islamic State today
-- "backsliders," like pagans, were to be fought until they either
accepted Islam or were killed.
In India
alone, between 60 and 80 million Hindus may have been put to death by Muslim
armies between the years 1000-1525.
Last week, before the Islamic State beheaded its third Westerner, U.S.
President Barack Obama announced that, "ISIL is not Islamic. No religion
condones the killing of innocents."
Well, not exactly.
How often -- despite the current spectacle of the Islamic State [IS,
ISIL or ISIS] in Syria and Iraq -- do we hear politicians and church leaders
say that Islam is a religion of peace; that Islamic extremism is a modern
innovation, a profound deviation from some imagined "true" Islam,
and even that its very name, the word "Islam," means peace?
It is not just Muslims who say that Islam is a religion of peace: some
Western politicians and churchmen repeat it too.
Britain's Prime Minister, David Cameron, emphasized it last week on BBC
on Sept 13, in response to the beheading by ISIS of the British aid worker,
David Haines.
Former U.S. President George W. Bush said so more than once, including
in a speech he delivered on September 17, 2001.
What Does Hamas Really Want?
by Yaakov Lappin
• September 17, 2014 at 4:00 am
Hamas's
long-term ambitions are indistinguishable from those of Islamic State and
al-Qaeda.
Hamas will
now focus on its next goal -- trying to strengthen its presence in the West
Bank and eventually toppling the Palestinian Authority from power there, just
as it did in Gaza. If Israel were to withdraw from the West Bank, Hamas would
certainly find such a goal easier to accomplish.
Nothing
keeps the flames of jihad alight, and Hamas's popularity secure, like
frequent wars.
As the dust settles in Gaza and Israel after a relatively long war, the
current truce forms a good opportunity to examine the reason Hamas began
their conflict this summer in the first place.
Many observers have cited Hamas's goal of lifting the Israeli security
blockade around Gaza as the aim of its war. The blockade was put in place to
prevent weapons from being smuggled to Hamas inside the Strip, which is
already saturated with rockets and arms.
Israel's blockade only exists because Hamas has turned Gaza into a
heavily harmed hornet's nest of terrorism. Hence, the idea that Hamas
believed that firing thousands of rockets and attempting to send death squads
into Israel through underground tunnels would somehow force Israel into
easing the blockade to make attacking Israel easier seems unconvincing.
|
||
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Islam and the "Killing of Innocents"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment