Manufacturing Excuses So Iran Can Get Nukes
by Peter Huessy
• September 24, 2014 at 5:00 am
We assume
Iran's leaders will abide by the very international rules they are dedicated
to destroying.
When we
refer to Iranian missiles as a legitimate form of "deterrence," we
just fool ourselves into imagining that Iranian missiles, which support
aggression, are no different from American and allied missiles, which prevent
and deter aggression.
The U.S.
has said it would not address Iran's 30-plus years of sponsorship of terror
nor is extensive ballistic missile program, even though the U.S. officially
designates Iran as the leading state-sponsor of terror in the world.
While security threats have been increasingly serious, the United States
and its allies have not been willing honestly to face the challenges of our
time -- especially from the coalition of oil-rich, rogue state sponsors of
terror and their jihadist affiliates.
Instead they have been content to push for declining defense budgets and
jettisoning their security obligations. This has -- and is -- making it
increasingly difficult to find the leadership necessary to lead a coalition
of nations to defeat the threats we face.
The United States is making three critical mistakes.
First, much of the deterrent effect of U.S. military power is being
squandered. Not only have the U.S. and its NATO allies neglected their
defense needs and cut defense budgets by a collective $2 trillion from the
base budgets of 2009[1], but many leaders have adopted the view that military
power is the problem, not part of the solution.
|
|
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Manufacturing Excuses So Iran Can Get Nukes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment