In this mailing:
Why Many Arabs and Muslims Do Not Trust Obama
by Khaled Abu Toameh
• September 15, 2014 at 5:00 am
Many
Arabs and Muslims identify with the terrorists' anti-Western objectives
ideology; they are afraid of being dubbed traitors and U.S. agents for
joining non-Muslims in a war that would result in the death of many Muslims,
and they are afraid their people would rise up against them.
Many Arab
and Muslim leaders view the Islamic State as a by-product of failed U.S.
policies, especially the current U.S. Administration's weak-kneed support for
Iraq's Nuri al-Maliki. Some of these leaders, such as Egypt's Abdel Fattah
al-Sisi, consider the U.S. to be a major ally of the Muslim Brotherhood. Sisi
and his regime will never forgive Obama for his support for the Muslim
Brotherhood.
Also,
they do not seem to have much confidence in the Obama Administration, which
is perceived as weak and incompetent when it comes to combating Islamists.
"This is not our war and we should not be taking part in it."
That is how many Arabs and Muslims reacted to US President Barack
Obama's plan to form an international coalition to fight the Islamic State
[IS] terrorist organization, which is operating in Iraq and Syria and
threatening to invade more Arab countries.
Islamic State terrorists have killed and wounded tens of thousands of
Arabs and Muslims, mostly over the past few months. By contrast, Islamic
State has targeted only a few Westerners, three of whom were beheaded in
recent weeks.
Islamic State terrorists are also responsible for the displacement of
millions of Iraqis and Syrians, and for the murder of many others.
Still, the atrocities committed by Islamic State against Arabs and
Muslims, in addition to the immediate threat it poses to many of their
countries, do not seem to be sufficient reason for them to declare war on the
group.
Will Scottish Independence Give Putin Pretext to Annex Eastern Ukraine?
by Peter Martino
• September 15, 2014 at 4:00 am
Scottish
independence would be a disaster for NATO, putting the UK nuclear deterrent
in jeopardy. It would also put into question national borders all over
Europe, including Catalonia, Belgium, France's Brittany and Corsica, Italy's
South Tyrol -- and Ukraine.
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned in 2008 that Kosovo's independence
"would be the beginning of the end for Europe."
Crimea's
recent secession from Ukraine was justified with a reference to "the
Kosovo precedent," which Putin pointed out, "our Western partners
created with their own hands."
This Thursday, Scotland will be holding a referendum on independence.
Polls predict that it may go either way; a narrow victory for those who want
Scotland to become an independent nation or for those who want it to remain a
part of the United Kingdom. While in most European capitals, governments are
hoping that the 'No' side will win the day, Russian president Vladimir Putin
in the Kremlin has several reasons to cheer if the Scots decide to go their
own way.
Scottish independence would be a disaster for NATO. The Scottish
nationalists have made it very clear that they want all British nuclear
weapons to be removed from Scottish soil. This will put the UK nuclear
deterrent in jeopardy. But Scottish independence is also likely to bring
national borders into question all over Europe, including the fragile
boundaries of the Ukraine.
|
||
To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php |
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Why Many Arabs and Muslims Do Not Trust Obama
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment