In this mailing:
- Soeren Kern: Britain's War on
Christianity: Part I
- Burak Bekdil: Turkey: Putin's
Ally in NATO?
by Soeren Kern • March 19, 2019
at 5:00 am
- "Christian
street preachers should be free to share the gospel, even
where it means challenging the beliefs of others." — Christian
Concern, in a petition to UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid.
- In recent years,
dozens of Christians — clergy and non-clergy — in Britain have
been arrested or fired from their jobs due to their faith.
Much of the harassment is based on three sections of two
British laws that are vague and open to subjective
interpretations.
- At an appeal hearing
at Bristol Crown Court, attorney Michael Phillips emphasized
the importance of freedom of speech, even in cases where the
speaker does not necessarily hold the views being expressed.
Another attorney, Paul Diamond, argued that there is no right
not to be exposed to contrary ideas. He added that should
passers-by not wish to hear the preaching, they are able to
walk away.
James
McConnell, a 78-year-old Christian pastor in Northern Ireland, was
charged in 2015 with making "grossly offensive remarks"
about Islam during a sermon. Pictured: Pastor McConnell leaves
Belfast Magistrates' Court on December 16, 2016 in Belfast,
Northern Ireland. (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)
The unlawful arrest of a Christian street preacher
in London has drawn attention to the continuing use of hate speech
laws to silence Christians in multicultural Britain — even as
incendiary speech by Muslim extremists is routinely ignored.
On February 23, Oluwole Ilesanmi, a 64-year-old
Nigerian evangelist known as Preacher Olu, was arrested at
Southgate Station in North London after complaints that his message
about Jesus was "Islamophobic." A video of the arrest,
viewed more than two million times, shows how two police officers
ordered the man to stop preaching because "nobody wants to
listen to that," confiscated his Bible and then arrested him
for "a breach of peace."
by Burak Bekdil • March 19, 2019
at 4:00 am
- On March 7, Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said Turkey would never turn
back from the S-400 missile deal with Russia. He even added
that Ankara may subsequently look into buying the more
advanced S-500 systems now under construction in Russia.
- With the S-400 deal,
Turkey is simply telling its theoretical Western allies that
it views "them," and "not Russia," as a
security threat. Given that Russia is widely considered a
security threat to NATO, Turkey's odd-one-out position
inevitably calls for questioning its official NATO identity.
- Turkey has NATO's
second biggest army, and its military love affair with Russia
may be in its infancy now, but it undermines NATO's military
deterrence against Russia.
Turkey has
NATO's second biggest army, and its military love affair with
Russia may be in its infancy now, but it undermines NATO's military
deterrence against Russia. Pictured: Turkish President Recep Tayyip
Erdoğan meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, on
March 10, 2017. (Image source: kremlin.ru)
On September 17, 1950, more than 68 years ago, the
first Turkish brigade left the port of Mersin on the Mediterranean
coast, arriving, 26 days later, at Busan in Korea. Turkey was the
first country, after the United States, to answer the United
Nations' call for military aid to South Korea after the North
attacked that year. Turkey sent four brigades (a total of 21,212
soldiers) to a country that is 7,785 km away. By the end of the
Korean War, Turkey had lost 741 soldiers killed in action. The U.N.
Memorial Cemetery in Busan embraces 462 Turkish soldiers.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment