Weekly Think Piece ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Tale of Two Jihads
India is struggling with its own Islamist factions in the country. Vice-President
Bhairon Singh Shekhawat has expressed
concern over growing militancy in the country and called for an action plan to deal with the problem.
The problem?
He said the problems of militancy and naxalism would not be solved until the political system improves or a coalition government continues to pull in different directions on issues of national importance. Shekhawat made these observations on Monday evening while releasing a book, 'Global Jihad: Current
Patterns and Future Trends', written by Rajeev Sharma, a senior journalist with The Tribune, who has been covering strategic affairs or long.
"If people in Pakistan
read the book, they will at least realise that Jihad is not a religion," said Shekhawat.
"They (some people in Pakistan) have been holding the delusion that if somebody attacks a temple in India or the Indian Parliament, it is jihad," he added. This book will help you understand terrorism and see the cover it has got in the guise of religion.''
OK. So far so good. His solution?
He said the chunk of the population is jobless and this
is very humiliating and frustrating for the youth. He said it is this
joblessness that fires the youth to join Ranbir Sena in Bihar
or some mafia. ``If you call Jihad a clash of civilisation, it will not sort
out the problem.''
The same old liberal line. It's the poor downtrodden youth with no future who
are responsible for the terrorism.
Or is it?
Between 2001 and 2003, a French academic named Farhad Khosrokhavar interviewed terror detainees in French prisons, including 10 suspected members of al Qaeda and 4
other Islamic radicals. His interviews and commentary have now been published
in a French book, Quand Al-Qaida Parle, "When al Qaeda Speaks." Khosrokhavar's research suggests that al Qaeda has something very different to say from what most of us would expect to hear.
1) The terror suspects in French custody are not poor and not unsophisticated. One
of them warns Khosrokhavar against the risks of using invalid sampling
techniques in his research! The most radical are also the most privileged.
2) These French radicals tend almost never to come from religious families. Their
religion is self-taught, and largely self-invented.
3) The pre-eminent target of their hatred is not the United
States or Israel, but France.
In fact, they know almost nothing about the United
States or Israel - and what they do know, comes not from al Jazeera, but from the French media: Almost none of them speak Arabic.
Pretty interesting, huh? Here's more.
Europeans across the political spectrum share a belief
that their comfortable lives have been jeopardized by an American-imposed
"war on terror" that has radicalized their Muslim populations.
Khosrokhavar's research suggests exactly the opposite conclusion: It is the
failure of European societies to assimilate their Muslim migrants that creates
a security threat for America.
Shekhawat & Khosrokhavar seem to be living on two different planets.
| 
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment