| ||||
Homepage Articles Blog | ||||
You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. | ||||
Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area. Should We Believe Rashad Hussain?by Daniel Pipes http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2010/02/believe-rashad-hussain
Rashad Hussain, Barack Obama's special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, has run into a problem: He appears to be an Islamist. The evidence largely concerns a public statement he made six years ago, as Josh Gerstein reports in Politico:
Of course, this not at all the case: Sami Al-Arian was an accessory to terrorism by Palestinian Islamic Jihad and he sits at this moment in a U.S. jail for his actions. At this point, Hussain's views hinge on the reliability of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Its news editor, Delinda Hanley, explained that his
As someone who has experienced first-hand the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs' grossly inaccurate reporting, I should like to voice an opinion here. In July 2001, the magazine reported on a panel I took part in at Lewis and Clark College in Oregon. It ascribed to me the statement that "The Palestinians are a miserable people … and they deserve to be." I had not said this and immediately responded to the article. WRMEA (snidely) published my letter to the editor in its October 2001 in which I denied having made this statement, said it's "not how I think, speak, or write," and quoted from an article of mine published six days after the panel to show my actual views about Palestinians. Now, the WRMEA, an obsessively anti-Zionist publication that believes Israel's Mossad killed Kennedy, overthrew Nixon, and considered assassinating George H. W. Bush, clearly likes Hussain more with than me, so his misquote eventually got pulled while mine, eight-plus years later, yet languishes on its website, and is still used against me. But that should now divert attention from WRMEA's reliance on amateur ideologues to "report" on events for it and the publication's lack of credibility. In an argument between Hussain and WRMEA, therefore, I am inclined to believe the former. (February 17, 2010) Related Topics: Muslims in the United States, Radical Islam This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. | ||||
Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services: |
Thursday, February 18, 2010
#984 Pipes asks "Should We Believe Rashad Hussain?" in NRO
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment