Friday, September 28, 2012

Eye on Iran: Iran Faces New Blow as South Korea Firm Ends Ship Work








For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

Reuters:
"The last big company doing classification work on Iranian ships, key to securing insurance and ports access, said on Friday it is stopping the work, spelling further difficulty for Iran's shipping, including its oil exports. The Korean Register of Shipping (KR) is the last of the world's top 13 classification societies to halt marine work in Iran following a recent exodus, including Britain's Lloyd's Register, triggered by Western sanctions on Tehran. 'In early August, the Korean Register of Shipping took the decision to stop providing classification services to Iranian ships. All relevant authorities and parties concerned were informed at that time,' KR said in a statement on Friday... In July, KR had sidestepped calls by U.S. pressure group United Against Nuclear Iran to halt its verification work saying it was concerned that vessel safety and marine environment protection could be compromised... IACS members such as Germany's Germanischer Lloyd and France's Bureau Veritas pulled out of Iran after being urged to exit by United Against Nuclear Iran, which includes former U.S. ambassadors on its board and is funded by private donations. The pressure group backs tougher sanctions on Iran. 'We applaud KR for this responsible and significant decision,' a spokesman for the group said on Friday. 'KR has joined other shipping services and countries in forcing Iran's business partners to now assume most all of the shipping risks for their business with the regime.'" http://t.uani.com/OtyMiO

WashPost: "Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that a firm ultimatum to Iran is the only peaceful way to stop the regime in Tehran from getting atomic weapons, increasing pressure on President Obama weeks before the U.S. presidential election. Netanyahu's address to the U.N. General Assembly was a highly public argument for a stronger U.S. threat to attack Iran if it does not back off from what the Israeli leader described as the final push toward a nuclear weapon. Israel and the United States say the program is intended to develop a weapon, an accusation that Iran denies. Netanyahu made a case, laced with historical references, for telling Iran explicitly where it must stop to forestall an outside attack. He also warned that time was running out.  'At this late hour there is only one way to peacefully prevent Iran from getting atomic bombs,' Netan¬yahu told the annual gathering. 'And that is by placing a clear red line on Iran's nuclear weapons program.'" http://t.uani.com/PKCwcN

NYT: "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel told the United Nations on Thursday that Iran's capability to enrich uranium must be stopped before next spring or early summer, arguing that by that time the country will be in a position to make a short, perhaps undetectable, sprint to manufacture its first nuclear weapon. In his speech at the annual General Assembly, Mr. Netanyahu dramatically illustrated his intention to shut down Iran's nuclear program by drawing a red line through a cartoonish diagram of a bomb. But the substance of his speech suggested a softening of what had been a difficult dispute with the Obama administration on how to confront Iran over its nuclear program. Only two weeks after that dispute broke into the open, Mr. Netanyahu on Thursday praised the warning Mr. Obama gave Iran in his own General Assembly speech on Tuesday. 'I very much appreciate the president's position, as does everyone in my country,' he said. The Israeli leader's speech also suggested that his deadline for a military strike was well past the American presidential election and into 2013 - perhaps as late as next summer." http://t.uani.com/SUn0JR
Warwick Boycott BannerUN General Assembly

NY Daily News: "While President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad leisurely relishes the Manhattan highlife, his Iranian underlings have been scouring the town for low prices - including cheap shoes. Bargain-hunting members of the huge visiting delegation eagerly visited a Costco, a Payless shoe store, a Walgreens and a Duane Reade in recent days while hunting for discount products in short supply back home: Shampoo. Soap. Vitamins. Tylenol. 'Since they are under sanctions, they can't get this stuff,' a man assigned to work with the Iranians told the Daily News on Wednesday. '. . . (And) their money is weak compared to the dollar.'" http://t.uani.com/Q81dzJ

Reuters: "Iran blamed on Thursday 'a terrorist sect' for accosting a senior Iranian diplomat in New York and condemned the United States for deciding to remove the group, the Mujahadin-e Khalq (MEK), from a U.S. list of foreign terrorist organizations. New York police said Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast was verbally abused, pushed and shoved by 'anti-regime' protesters on the street as he walked a few blocks from the headquarters of the United Nations on Wednesday. He became separated from members of his party traveling by car in a protected motorcade on Wednesday, New York Police Department spokesman Paul Browne said. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressed the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday." http://t.uani.com/Shkey4  

Nuclear Program

Reuters: "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's U.N. speech about Iranian nuclear advances has dampened speculation in Israel that he could order a war this year. Analyzing Thursday's address in which Netanyahu literally drew a 'red line' on a cartoon bomb to show how close Iran was to building nuclear weaponry, commentators saw his deadline for any military action falling in early or mid-2013, well after U.S. elections in November and a possible snap Israeli poll. 'The decisive year of 2012 will pass without decisiveness,' wrote Ofer Shelah of Maariv newspaper on Friday." http://t.uani.com/PdisNG

Reuters: "Iran responded to Israel's 'red line' for Tehran's nuclear program on Thursday by declaring it was strong enough to defend itself and that it reserved the right to retaliate with full force against any attack. In a response to a speech at the U.N. General Assembly by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran's U.N. mission said Israel had made 'baseless and absurd allegations against (its) exclusively peaceful nuclear program.' 'While the use, or threat of use, of force under any pretext is a grave violation of the principles of (the) UN Charter and international law, as well as the norms of international relations, the officials of the Israeli regime are so rude (they) on (a) daily basis threaten countries in the region, particularly my country, (with) military attack,' Iran said. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is strong enough to defend itself and reserves its full right to retaliate with full force against any attack,' the Iranian mission said in the written statement." http://t.uani.com/QKpKdg

AP: "World powers decided Thursday to lay the groundwork for another round of negotiations with Iran over its disputed nuclear program, a senior U.S. official said, but they want a significantly improved offer from the Islamic republic. Neither the U.S. nor any of its international partners was ready to abandon diplomacy in favor of military or other actions, as Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu has advocated. The new hope for negotiated end to Iran's decade-long nuclear standoff came after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton met with the foreign ministers of Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia - powers that have sought, over several rounds of talks, to persuade Iran to halt its production of material that could be used in nuclear weapons. All such efforts have failed so far." http://t.uani.com/RnRNBE

Reuters: "China said on Thursday that the disagreement over Iran's nuclear program had reached 'a new, crucial stage,' calling for Tehran to begin a new round of talks with world powers, something a U.S. official said could happen at some point. Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi made the comment after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a speech drawing a 'red line' for Iran's nuclear program on Thursday, despite a U.S. refusal to set an ultimatum, saying Tehran will be on the brink of a nuclear weapon in less than a year." http://t.uani.com/PKC26p

Sanctions

Reuters:
"Japan, a major buyer of Iranian crude, is set to import about 30 percent less crude oil from Iran for the rest of this year compared with a year earlier, the president of the Petroleum Association of Japan (PAJ) said on Friday. Japan, the world's third-biggest oil consumer, imported 101,035 barrels per day of crude from Iran in August, down 66.8 percent from a year earlier, the trade ministry's data showed. The association's president, Yasushi Kimura, said the steep year-on-year fall in August was caused by certain shipping arrangements and should be considered an exception." http://t.uani.com/QjHZ8I

NYT: "An internal report prepared by Israel's Foreign Ministry calls for an additional round of international sanctions against Iran, an Israeli official confirmed on Thursday, in what appeared to be a rare Israeli acknowledgment that there might still be time to try to stop the Iranian nuclear program by means other than military action... The Foreign Ministry report states that the international sanctions already imposed on Iran are having a deep effect on the country's economy, according to the official, and may, according to some assessments, also be affecting the stability of the Iranian government. But the sanctions have not yet persuaded the government in Tehran to suspend its nuclear drive. Therefore, the report concludes that 'another round of sanctions is needed,' the official said." http://t.uani.com/RnMx10

FT: "Iran has revived a multiple-rate currency system last used in the aftermath of its eight-year war with Iraq, but it has failed to curb a currency crisis caused by international sanctions over its nuclear programme. For more than a decade the Central Bank of Iran has supported the national currency, the rial, through a managed float system that helped it maintain a single exchange rate against hard currencies. But currency volatility over the past year has widened the gap between the official and open market exchange rates, leading to the near-collapse of the single-tier system.  The tightening of US banking sanctions and an EU ban on oil imports since July have caused the the rial to fall more than 50 per cent against the US dollar since the beginning of this year. Sanctions have not only caused Iran's oil revenues to shrink, but have also made it difficult for Tehran to receive payments, which are plagued by long delays and high fees." http://t.uani.com/Q84wH4

NBC News: "Even though threats of war with Israel are almost a daily occurrence, what's really on people's minds in this city is the economy. The United States, the European Union and the U.N. have imposed tough economic sanctions against Iran, blocking access to the international banking system and curbing sales of Iranian crude oil as a way to persuade Tehran to abandon its nuclear program. As a result, Iran's currency, the rial, is in a constant state of flux, but mostly on a downward trajectory. These days, it seems to fall in value against the dollar on an hourly basis. On Tuesday the currency hit an all-time low against the U.S. dollar, trading at 26,500 to the U.S. dollar on the open market, according to Persian-language currency tracking website Mazanex. 'Our money is becoming more and more worthless every day,' said Sarvenas Sadi, an elderly woman doing her daily shopping in Tehran earlier this week." http://t.uani.com/PvTeLX

Terrorism

AP:
"Three people have been convicted of plotting to kill teachers at a Jewish school in Azerbaijan. A court in the capital Baku on Thursday found plot ringleader Rasim Aliyev and two other Azerbaijani citizens guilty of plotting the assassination of public officials and gun-smuggling. Aliyev was given a 14-year sentence while the others received 13 and eight years. Investigators said Aliyev was hired to carry out the killings in Baku by an individual linked to security services in neighboring Iran." http://t.uani.com/QjKZC8

Reuters: "Argentina and Iran will keep talking until they resolve diplomatically sensitive issues stemming from two 1990s attacks on Jewish targets in Buenos Aires that were allegedly sponsored by Tehran, both countries said on Thursday. Dialogue with Tehran is risky for Argentina, even if the focus is on Tehran's possible culpability in a pair of bombings. The opening of a diplomatic channel with Tehran could anger the United States and Israel, which are seeking to isolate Iran as it appears to pursue nuclear weapons. Argentine President Cristina Fernandez surprised the United Nations General Assembly this week by announcing the talks." http://t.uani.com/VU9BFC 

Syrian Uprising


AP:
"Iran should only play a role in international diplomatic efforts to end the violence in Syria if it withdraws support for President Bashar Assad's regime, Britain's Middle East minister said Thursday. Alistair Burt told The Associated Press in an interview that Iran could only have credibility in efforts to press Damascus by withdrawing its backing for Assad. 'Until the Iranians change their position in relation to Syria and stop their active support of a regime that's killing its own people, it's difficult to take them completely seriously,' he said, noting that several nations in the Middle East shared Britain's skepticism." http://t.uani.com/SI7MNh 

Human Rights

CNN: "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insists his government does not know the whereabouts of the American retired FBI agent who disappeared in Iran five and a half years ago, but that Iranian officials continue to assist in the effort to find him and send him home. Robert Levinson vanished during a business trip to Iran's Kish Island on March 8, 2007. His family says he was working as a private investigator looking into cigarette smuggling in Iran when he went missing. The State Department has repeatedly denied he was working for the government and has urged Tehran to find him. Christine Levinson, Robert's wife of 38 years, travelled from her home in Florida, New York, this week in hopes of making a personal plea to Ahmadinejad, who is attending this week's U.N. General Assembly." http://t.uani.com/PvUv5K  

Opinion & Analysis

Stephen Hadley in FP: "The Iranian nuclear program poses one of the most pressing national security challenges confronting the United States today. After years of increasing economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure -- backed by the threat of force -- under both Republican and Democratic administrations, the United States and the international community have still not achieved an acceptable outcome that prevents Iran from using its existing nuclear program for achieving a nuclear weapon. Meanwhile, Iran is dangerously approaching the threshold of a nuclear weapon capability as its centrifuges continue to produce a growing stockpile of enriched uranium that could be converted into material for a nuclear bomb. We have reached the point where all options -- economic, political, diplomatic, and military -- must be carefully examined and substantively debated in the public domain. The purpose of this article is not to advocate a particular course of action, but to contribute to the public debate by setting out the full range of plausible approaches to resolving the confrontation between the international community and the Iranian regime over its nuclear program -- a program that virtually the entire international community believes is a vehicle for achieving an advanced nuclear-weapons capability if not a nuclear bomb itself. Eight options are described below -- from negotiations through use of force to containment -- along with potential benefits and costs in each case. These should be viewed as a set of 'nested' options that could lead sequentially from one to another. They should be seen not in two dimensions, with the task being to pick one of the options from among the list, but in three, as a family of options through which the policy of the United States and the international community could move over time depending on the success or failure of prior options -- and the choices made by the Iranian regime. Why conduct a review of Iran options now? Partly because of the American experience in Iraq. The U.S. military action there was not, as many suggest, either a war of choice or a war of preemption. It was, rather, a war of last resort. After 12 years of diplomacy, 17 U.N. Security Council resolutions, increasingly targeted economic sanctions, multiple international inspection efforts, no-fly zones over both northern and southern Iraq, the selective use of U.S. military force in 1998, and Saddam Hussein's rejection of a final opportunity to leave Iraq and avoid war, the United States and the international community were out of options. The choice was either to capitulate to Saddam Hussein's defiance of the demands of the international community or to make good on the 'serious consequences' promised by the United Nations for such defiance. The United States and its international partners on Iraq chose the latter course. Many people have argued that before making this fateful decision, U.S. policymakers should have stepped back and conducted one last searching examination of possible alternative courses of action. If that is the case, then it is now time -- and perhaps almost past time -- to make such an effort with respect to Iran. For there is a better than even chance that sometime next year the United States and its international partners will find themselves similarly out of options -- and face the choice of either military action against Iran or accepting an Iran with a clear path to a nuclear weapon. So if there are alternatives to these two grim choices, now is the time to find them -- as well as to think through carefully the military options available." http://t.uani.com/QvhKjf

Peter Kohanloo in The Daily Caller: "The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) will be hosting its annual conference next week in our nation's capital. The gathering is billed as an opportunity to discuss the most important issues concerning Iranian-Americans today. But can the pro-Tehran outfit be considered a credible voice of the Iranian-American community? Just last week, U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates ruled against NIAC in its protracted, three-year legal battle to silence an Iranian journalist who had charged the organization with lobbying for the mullah regime. Judge Bates concluded that NIAC president Trita Parsi's activities are consistent 'with the idea that he was first and foremost an advocate for the [Tehran] regime.' He added that 'while Parsi does criticize Iran's human rights record, his criticisms are tepid.' NIAC's critics - who have been bullied and smeared by it for years - were finally vindicated. Fresh on the heels of losing its defamation lawsuit, NIAC received more bad news when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that she would be removing the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), an Iranian opposition group, from the State Department's list of terrorist organizations. Although the MEK lies on the fringe of the Iranian political spectrum, NIAC devoted enormous amounts of time and energy to prevent its delisting. The effort, it now appears, was largely a red herring, distracting the community from the real challenge facing it today: supporting the Iranian people as they confront the clerical dictatorship in Tehran. Despite these back-to-back failures, NIAC continues to display a tin ear to the aspirations of Iranian-Americans. Take their choice of keynote speaker. The organization has invited the ultimate icon of leftist anti-Americanism, Noam Chomsky, as its keynote speaker. That would be the same Noam Chomsky who has denied both the Cambodian genocide and the Serbian massacre of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica - until recently the single largest mass killing of Muslim civilians. In a 2010 interview with a Persian-language outlet, Chomsky declared that 'in the past 55 years there has not been a single day that the U.S. has not tortured the Iranian people.' Such anti-American demagoguery has little appeal for Iranian-Americans who sought refuge here from a tyrannical regime that has repeated the vile slogan 'Death to America!' since its inception. That NIAC has positioned itself far from the mainstream of Iranian-American life is self-evident. Its regime-friendly agenda doesn't reflect the values of the Iranian-American community, the vast majority of which prefers not drawn-out, fruitless negotiations with Tehran's despots and 'gradualism,' but a fundamental democratic transformation in their ancestral homeland." http://t.uani.com/VUdlH6 

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment